Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump supported OrdinaryDiffEq version to anything < 6.58.0 #617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

johnzl-777
Copy link
Collaborator

Prior testing shows that for now, any version of OrdinaryDiffEq less than 6.58 works. The choice to restrict to < 6.57 came from some confusion over #615 where it was assumed < 6.57 would fix an (unrelated) issue with BloqadeKrylov.

This is temporary solution while I work on removing our dependence on the internal __init.

The dependency on SimpleNonlinearSolve has also been removed.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (eb75d28) 76.65% compared to head (416f193) 73.67%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #617      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.65%   73.67%   -2.98%     
==========================================
  Files          94       60      -34     
  Lines        4801     3556    -1245     
==========================================
- Hits         3680     2620    -1060     
+ Misses       1121      936     -185     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@johnzl-777 johnzl-777 marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2023 14:46
@johnzl-777 johnzl-777 merged commit 067aa01 into master Nov 15, 2023
24 of 28 checks passed
@johnzl-777 johnzl-777 deleted the john/raise-ordinarydiffeq-compat branch November 15, 2023 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants