Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve infrastructure diagrams #42

Open
Tracked by #2
jaimergp opened this issue Jun 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
Tracked by #2

Improve infrastructure diagrams #42

jaimergp opened this issue Jun 1, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor

jaimergp commented Jun 1, 2023

#34 added some preliminary diagrams but these are not final. Diagrams are great to create a visual image of what's out there, which seems handy in conda-forge, given the amount of moving pieces we have.

I started a mindmap diagram with mermaid to provide this mental model of all the infrastructure (without relationships, just the inventory). You can see it here:

Once we have that I guess we can start breaking it down in chunks, with each chunk having the relationships between elements when needed.

@trallard
Copy link
Member

Some work had been done in https://cf-infra-docs.netlify.app/docs/advanced/automation/
Still need to build on and improve the content and structure

@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related PR from 2021: conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io#1245

@jaimergp jaimergp assigned zklaus and unassigned viniciusdc Feb 22, 2024
@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Take advantage of the momentum reviewing cf-infra-docs to see if there are opportunities to complement the docs with figures that make everything a bit easier to understand. No need for them to be self-explanatory.

@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jaimergp jaimergp moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🏗 In progress in czi-conda-forge 📦 Jul 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants