Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

display holders sorted by amount #670

Open
qizhou opened this issue Aug 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

display holders sorted by amount #670

qizhou opened this issue Aug 1, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@qizhou
Copy link
Contributor

qizhou commented Aug 1, 2019

No description provided.

@ninjaahhh
Copy link
Contributor

something like https://etherscan.io/accounts ?

@qizhou
Copy link
Contributor Author

qizhou commented Aug 6, 2019 via email

@ninjaahhh
Copy link
Contributor

I'm worried more and more extra information will be needed in the future (such as internal transfers inside contracts, miner -> mined blocks indexing, etc), and putting them all into the indexer node's code seems unnecessary.

I think we should at one point fork current pyquarkchain and make code changes separately to fully instrument whatever information we want, without affecting current core business logic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants