You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand why we currently have SOLUS objects, to separate things like the raw_requirements from our data set. Unfortunately this has implication on the API. Our current system only allows filtering based on base level fields, which means that we either get ALL of the solus objects, or none of them. I think it would make sense to instead prefix the name of the fields with solus_, getting names like solus_requirements and solus_id.
In addition, it may make more sense for them to be ps_requirements (peoplesoft requirements), as solus is just a queens name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Re-post of Queens-Hacks/qcumber-data#7
from @mystor:
I understand why we currently have SOLUS objects, to separate things like the raw_requirements from our data set. Unfortunately this has implication on the API. Our current system only allows filtering based on base level fields, which means that we either get ALL of the solus objects, or none of them. I think it would make sense to instead prefix the name of the fields with solus_, getting names like solus_requirements and solus_id.
In addition, it may make more sense for them to be ps_requirements (peoplesoft requirements), as solus is just a queens name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: