You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The slider in REDCap by default only allows values of 0-100 with labels of whatever you want, but the values are 0-100. This is an unnecessarily opinionated way of using the slider. It would be good to have sliders with arbitrary values. Suggestion: add the values to the field annotation in REDCap and ignore the values provided in the text
Additionally, the utilities/index.js parser doesn't correctly parse sliders. While aRMT app supports sliders, the definitions for these were manually crafted and not parsed from REDCap.
another refactor (perhaps we should provide the field annotations as JSON rather than text, this would be more flexible and easier to parse?
While we currently support a limited functionality replacement for the slider (i.e. the horizontal radio-button range type) see related: #15 (and #16)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The slider in REDCap by default only allows values of 0-100 with labels of whatever you want, but the values are 0-100. This is an unnecessarily opinionated way of using the slider. It would be good to have sliders with arbitrary values. Suggestion: add the values to the field annotation in REDCap and ignore the values provided in the text
Additionally, the
utilities/index.js
parser doesn't correctly parse sliders. While aRMT app supports sliders, the definitions for these were manually crafted and not parsed from REDCap.another refactor (perhaps we should provide the field annotations as JSON rather than text, this would be more flexible and easier to parse?
While we currently support a limited functionality replacement for the slider (i.e. the horizontal radio-button range type) see related: #15 (and #16)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: