Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Module config does not contain version number #9

Open
willprice76 opened this issue Sep 22, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Module config does not contain version number #9

willprice76 opened this issue Sep 22, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@willprice76
Copy link
Contributor

I have a scenario where I want to use the DXA module concept to define resources and configuration for clientside Javascript applications (little or no .NET/Java code). We would like to be able to control from the CMS which version of the module is being used on the site, and this would most easily be done by exposing the module version number to web application(s).
The template code could easily be updated to ensure that the softwareVersion field from the Module Configuration component is added to the configuration JSON for the module

@rpannekoek
Copy link
Contributor

The given scenario is very specific, but exposing the Module version in published configuration is a good idea in general to help with configuration versioning (if the configuration structure is changed, the new version of the Web App/Module may still be able to work with the old configuration structure; this facilitates rolling upgrades.)

@rpannekoek rpannekoek added this to the v2.2 milestone Dec 18, 2018
@rpannekoek
Copy link
Contributor

Internal Issue ID (for tracking purposes): CRQ-12803

@rpannekoek rpannekoek removed this from the v2.2 milestone Jan 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants