Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Too limited parameter type matching #108

Open
tz-lom opened this issue May 21, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Too limited parameter type matching #108

tz-lom opened this issue May 21, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@tz-lom
Copy link

tz-lom commented May 21, 2015

Given "class" matching is too narrow for many operations. If you need to generate reports for complex structures (like list-in-list packed trees) there is no propper class, also there is no way to override class verification or skip it.

@daroczig
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this report/suggestion. Unfortunately, I won't be able to work on new features in the near future, but to suggest a possible workaround for your needs: what about using a character class and passing the list with any number of levels and complexity as JSON, and parse inside of the template? I use this approach in some production templates, and works pretty well.

@liori
Copy link

liori commented Feb 5, 2017

I'd love to be able to simply disable any parameter checking. I would like to pass a function and an object coming from a C extension into the template.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants