Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporation of monolinks #21

Open
enriquead1 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Incorporation of monolinks #21

enriquead1 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@enriquead1
Copy link

I have just read the paper cited at the end, and it convinced me about the potential of monolinks as a source of experimental information regarding surface accessibility. As suggested there, this may be especially powerful on small proteins where cross-links are unlikely. Could this be implemented on Alphalink? What about monolink recovery on XiSearch?

Manalastas-Cantos, K., Adoni, K. R., Pfeifer, M., Märtens, B., Grünewald, K., Thalassinos, K., & Topf, M. (2024). Modeling flexible protein structure with AlphaFold2 and cross-linking mass spectrometry. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100724

@lhatsk
Copy link
Collaborator

lhatsk commented Feb 27, 2024

Thanks for pointing this out! Are there large-ish datasets available? It could be implemented in AlphaLink, but it's not in our plans at the moment. I could see it already working to some degree if you encode monolinks as self-links in the SDA network.

@enriquead1
Copy link
Author

You are welcome! Thank you for this work.
The same datasets with crosslinks contain also monolinks (crosslinks where only one of the reactive groups reacted). I have been checking XiFDR results and it does not seem too hard to extract them from _Linear_PSM_xiFDR files, as there is a "PepSeq1" column that includes the crosslinker when it is present.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants