-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
predict result issue #15
Comments
Yes it could be. The model wasn't trained for generalization across different datasets. To get better performance in that respect, one could combine all datasets into a single one and train a model based on that. Also see the related discussion here: #14 |
I was testing on cacd-coral.py. I think the cacd dataset has about 160,000 data, which is a relatively large data set and should have good generalization capability. Do you think should do separate training in a specific use case? |
You may have to. I am not sure if |
Well, thank you very much. In addition, I would like to ask why in the paper, only 14-62 age classification. Is it because there are very few samples in other age categories? For data balancing? |
Yes. that's correct. I think there were only 1-10 examples for some classes. |
In fact, if I add edged the categories with a small number of other samples, would it be worse than the results in the article? I think it has almost no effect, or it doesn't have much impact. It's just that the category with a small sample has poor effect. Is that what I think? Will increasing the number of classifications have an impact on the outcome? |
I think you are right and it would have almost 0 impact because there are only so few examples for the edge cases. If you look at the appendix, we have also done experiments with an even narrow range of classes such that the dataset was balanced. The results are almost the same. |
Thank you very much for your patient response. |
I used my own data set. First, the picture work with preprocess-cacd.py, and then using cacd-coral.py to get the age prediction. I tested 5 pictures and it didn't work well. But the results from the test pictures you provided are very good. Is this a problem with the generalization of the model? Or others?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: