Valley Bottom Geomorphic Unit Ratios #562
-
What metric do we want for GNAT and Mississippi reach typing? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
We want active channel, active floodplain and inactive floodplain.
These are fundamentally just proportion of valley bottom area, derived by taking there polygon areas (within the valley bottom sausage segment) and dividing by total valley bottom area.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@lauren-herbine this issue sort of went dormant, but is essentially now part of VBET. @shelbysawyer we are displaying in "Estimated Valley Bottom" Geomorphic Units Active as likelihood 0.99 to 0.8 and inactive 0.8 to 0.68. From what I've seen, this is not a good estimate. I am speculating that 0.9 will be better as a rough-cut of active vs. inactive. As such I have requested @KellyMWhitehead to change this in #415. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is answered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Active Channel to Valley Bottom Ratio
These areas are already calculated in VBET projects. I found them in the attribute tables for the It looks like we are already calculating this metric in (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑦 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡) / ((𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛 + 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 + 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 in𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛)) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Active Channel to Valley Bottom Ratio
These areas are already calculated in VBET projects. I found them in the attribute tables for the
Valley Bottom Geomorphic Units
:It looks like we are already calculating this metric in
prop_valley_bottom_pc
…