Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Find a better IMU #63

Open
cmcgowan27 opened this issue Sep 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Find a better IMU #63

cmcgowan27 opened this issue Sep 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
IGVC IGVC competition issues

Comments

@cmcgowan27
Copy link
Collaborator

cmcgowan27 commented Sep 10, 2019 •
edited
Loading

The IMU we're currently using is this one: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/14001

Software hasn't been happy with the performance. See David if you want more details about what we need.
@cmcgowan27 cmcgowan27 added the IGVC IGVC competition issues label Sep 10, 2019
@daweim0
Copy link
Member

daweim0 commented Sep 12, 2019

Find something as good or better than this https://www.mouser.com/new/bosch/bosch-sensortec-bmi088/
(or we should just decide to use that chip, it looks pretty baller)

@cmcgowan27
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I suspect that vibrations will be a bigger cause of drift than bias stability, so look for modules with that have a low value for linear acceleration sensitivity (usually given in degrees/second/g)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
IGVC IGVC competition issues
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@daweim0 @cmcgowan27