You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the sorted data loses the original indexing formation and at first thought it looks hard to keep the indexing information on the fly. Keeping the original indexing information can be essential in any practical usage because each data point typically represents a different object in a N-d space. Examples are atoms in molecules, planets or stars in galaxies, or locations in a map. On the contrary, it might not be important in image vectorization and volumetric data vectorization. An option/way to keep the original indexing information is needed.
Thoughts:
Skip the index column in the numpy array when doing sort. Technically, this enables skipping any columns.
In implementation, should also provide an option to add an index column if not already there but required to keep the information to the original data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the sorted data loses the original indexing formation and at first thought it looks hard to keep the indexing information on the fly. Keeping the original indexing information can be essential in any practical usage because each data point typically represents a different object in a N-d space. Examples are atoms in molecules, planets or stars in galaxies, or locations in a map. On the contrary, it might not be important in image vectorization and volumetric data vectorization. An option/way to keep the original indexing information is needed.
Thoughts:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: