Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rust unstable features needed for the kernel #2

Open
44 of 90 tasks
ojeda opened this issue Aug 28, 2020 · 52 comments
Open
44 of 90 tasks

Rust unstable features needed for the kernel #2

ojeda opened this issue Aug 28, 2020 · 52 comments
Labels
meta Meta issue. • toolchain Related to `rustc`, `bindgen`, `rustdoc`, LLVM, Clippy...

Comments

@ojeda
Copy link
Member

ojeda commented Aug 28, 2020

Unstable features (including language, library, tools...) we currently use.

See as well:

Required (we almost certainly want them)

Nice to have (not critical, we could workaround if needed, etc.)

Low priority (we will likely not use them in the end)

Done (stabilized, not needed anymore, etc.)

@ojeda ojeda added this to the Rust features milestone Aug 28, 2020
@ojeda ojeda pinned this issue Aug 28, 2020
ojeda added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2020
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
Allocating memory with regulator_list_mutex held makes lockdep unhappy
when memory pressure makes the system do fs_reclaim on eg. eMMC using
a regulator. Push the lock inside regulator_init_coupling() after the
allocation.

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.7.13+ #533 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock:
cca78ca4 (&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __submit_merged_write_cond+0x104/0x154
but task is already holding lock:
c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28
       __kmalloc+0x54/0x218
       regulator_register+0x860/0x1584
       dummy_regulator_probe+0x60/0xa8
[...]
other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem --> regulator_list_mutex --> fs_reclaim

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(regulator_list_mutex);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem);
 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by kswapd0/383:
 #0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50
[...]

Fixes: d8ca7d1 ("regulator: core: Introduce API for regulators coupling customization")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
	 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
	 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
	 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
	 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
	 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
	 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
	 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
	 do_mmap+0x376/0x580
	 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
	 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 __might_fault+0x68/0x90
	 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
	 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
	 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
	 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-fs-00);
				 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
				 lock(btrfs-fs-00);
    lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by compsize/11122:
   #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
   __might_fault+0x68/0x90
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
   copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
   ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
   search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
   btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
   btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
   ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
   ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.

CC: [email protected] # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
I got the following lockdep splat while testing:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630
	 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480
	 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60
	 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
	 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60
	 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140
	 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0
	 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0
	 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60
	 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
	 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60
	 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140
	 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0
	 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0
	 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
	 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0
	 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0
	 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
	 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
	 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
	 do_mmap+0x376/0x580
	 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
	 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __might_fault+0x68/0x90
	 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
	 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0
	 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0
	 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150
	 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b
	 start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c
	 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

  -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150
	 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900
	 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130
	 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0
	 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60
	 smp_init+0x26/0x71
	 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258
	 kernel_init+0xa/0x103
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0
	 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450
	 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200
	 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160
	 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170
	 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630
	 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock);
				 lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
				 lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock);
    lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  2 locks held by btrfs/229626:
   #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630
   #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450
   cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0
   ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450
   alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80
   __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200
   btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160
   scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170
   btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630
   ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0
   btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4
   btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0
   ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250
   ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
   ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
   ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250
   ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the
scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other
dependencies.

Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can
trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns
needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different
problem for which this fix is a solution.

Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the
scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually
assign them to the fs_info.  We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in
a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to
safely free the workqueues.

CC: [email protected] # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
…emory

If the hypervisor doesn't support hugepages, the kernel ends up allocating a large
number of page table pages. The early page table allocation was wrongly
setting the max memblock limit to ppc64_rma_size with radix translation
which resulted in boot failure as shown below.

Kernel panic - not syncing:
early_alloc_pgtable: Failed to allocate 16777216 bytes align=0x1000000 nid=-1 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0xffffffffffffffff
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.8.0-24.9-default+ #2
 Call Trace:
 [c0000000016f3d00] [c0000000007c6470] dump_stack+0xc4/0x114 (unreliable)
 [c0000000016f3d40] [c00000000014c78c] panic+0x164/0x418
 [c0000000016f3dd0] [c000000000098890] early_alloc_pgtable+0xe0/0xec
 [c0000000016f3e60] [c0000000010a5440] radix__early_init_mmu+0x360/0x4b4
 [c0000000016f3ef0] [c000000001099bac] early_init_mmu+0x1c/0x3c
 [c0000000016f3f10] [c00000000109a320] early_setup+0x134/0x170

This was because the kernel was checking for the radix feature before we enable the
feature via mmu_features. This resulted in the kernel using hash restrictions on
radix.

Rework the early init code such that the kernel boot with memblock restrictions
as imposed by hash. At that point, the kernel still hasn't finalized the
translation the kernel will end up using.

We have three different ways of detecting radix.

1. dt_cpu_ftrs_scan -> used only in case of PowerNV
2. ibm,pa-features -> Used when we don't use cpu_dt_ftr_scan
3. CAS -> Where we negotiate with hypervisor about the supported translation.

We look at 1 or 2 early in the boot and after that, we look at the CAS vector to
finalize the translation the kernel will use. We also support a kernel command
line option (disable_radix) to switch to hash.

Update the memblock limit after mmu_early_init_devtree() if the kernel is going
to use radix translation. This forces some of the memblock allocations we do before
mmu_early_init_devtree() to be within the RMA limit.

Fixes: 2bfd65e ("powerpc/mm/radix: Add radix callbacks for early init routines")
Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
…s metrics" test

Linux 5.9 introduced perf test case "Parse and process metrics" and
on s390 this test case always dumps core:

  [root@t35lp67 perf]# ./perf test -vvvv -F 67
  67: Parse and process metrics                             :
  --- start ---
  metric expr inst_retired.any / cpu_clk_unhalted.thread for IPC
  parsing metric: inst_retired.any / cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)
  [root@t35lp67 perf]#

I debugged this core dump and gdb shows this call chain:

  (gdb) where
   #0  0x000003ffabc3192a in __strnlen_c_1 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
   #1  0x000003ffabc293de in strcasestr () from /lib64/libc.so.6
   #2  0x0000000001102ba2 in match_metric(list=0x1e6ea20 "inst_retired.any",
            n=<optimized out>)
       at util/metricgroup.c:368
   #3  find_metric (map=<optimized out>, map=<optimized out>,
           metric=0x1e6ea20 "inst_retired.any")
      at util/metricgroup.c:765
   #4  __resolve_metric (ids=0x0, map=<optimized out>, metric_list=0x0,
           metric_no_group=<optimized out>, m=<optimized out>)
      at util/metricgroup.c:844
   #5  resolve_metric (ids=0x0, map=0x0, metric_list=0x0,
          metric_no_group=<optimized out>)
      at util/metricgroup.c:881
   #6  metricgroup__add_metric (metric=<optimized out>,
        metric_no_group=metric_no_group@entry=false, events=<optimized out>,
        events@entry=0x3ffd84fb878, metric_list=0x0,
        metric_list@entry=0x3ffd84fb868, map=0x0)
      at util/metricgroup.c:943
   #7  0x00000000011034ae in metricgroup__add_metric_list (map=0x13f9828 <map>,
        metric_list=0x3ffd84fb868, events=0x3ffd84fb878,
        metric_no_group=<optimized out>, list=<optimized out>)
      at util/metricgroup.c:988
   #8  parse_groups (perf_evlist=perf_evlist@entry=0x1e70260,
          str=str@entry=0x12f34b2 "IPC", metric_no_group=<optimized out>,
          metric_no_merge=<optimized out>,
          fake_pmu=fake_pmu@entry=0x1462f18 <perf_pmu.fake>,
          metric_events=0x3ffd84fba58, map=0x1)
      at util/metricgroup.c:1040
   #9  0x0000000001103eb2 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test(
  	evlist=evlist@entry=0x1e70260, map=map@entry=0x13f9828 <map>,
  	str=str@entry=0x12f34b2 "IPC",
  	metric_no_group=metric_no_group@entry=false,
  	metric_no_merge=metric_no_merge@entry=false,
  	metric_events=0x3ffd84fba58)
      at util/metricgroup.c:1082
   #10 0x00000000010c84d8 in __compute_metric (ratio2=0x0, name2=0x0,
          ratio1=<synthetic pointer>, name1=0x12f34b2 "IPC",
  	vals=0x3ffd84fbad8, name=0x12f34b2 "IPC")
      at tests/parse-metric.c:159
   #11 compute_metric (ratio=<synthetic pointer>, vals=0x3ffd84fbad8,
  	name=0x12f34b2 "IPC")
      at tests/parse-metric.c:189
   #12 test_ipc () at tests/parse-metric.c:208
.....
..... omitted many more lines

This test case was added with
commit 218ca91 ("perf tests: Add parse metric test for frontend metric").

When I compile with make DEBUG=y it works fine and I do not get a core dump.

It turned out that the above listed function call chain worked on a struct
pmu_event array which requires a trailing element with zeroes which was
missing. The marco map_for_each_event() loops over that array tests for members
metric_expr/metric_name/metric_group being non-NULL. Adding this element fixes
the issue.

Output after:

  [root@t35lp46 perf]# ./perf test 67
  67: Parse and process metrics                             : Ok
  [root@t35lp46 perf]#

Committer notes:

As Ian remarks, this is not s390 specific:

<quote Ian>
  This also shows up with address sanitizer on all architectures
  (perhaps change the patch title) and perhaps add a "Fixes: <commit>"
  tag.

  =================================================================
  ==4718==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address
  0x55c93b4d59e8 at pc 0x55c93a1541e2 bp 0x7ffd24327c60 sp
  0x7ffd24327c58
  READ of size 8 at 0x55c93b4d59e8 thread T0
      #0 0x55c93a1541e1 in find_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:764:2
      #1 0x55c93a153e6c in __resolve_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:844:9
      #2 0x55c93a152f18 in resolve_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:881:9
      #3 0x55c93a1528db in metricgroup__add_metric
  tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:943:9
      #4 0x55c93a151996 in metricgroup__add_metric_list
  tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:988:9
      #5 0x55c93a1511b9 in parse_groups tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:1040:8
      #6 0x55c93a1513e1 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test
  tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:1082:9
      #7 0x55c93a0108ae in __compute_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:159:8
      #8 0x55c93a010744 in compute_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:189:9
      #9 0x55c93a00f5ee in test_ipc tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:208:2
      #10 0x55c93a00f1e8 in test__parse_metric
  tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:345:2
      #11 0x55c939fd7202 in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:410:9
      #12 0x55c939fd6736 in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:440:9
      #13 0x55c939fd58c3 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:661:4
      #14 0x55c939fd4e02 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:807:9
      #15 0x55c939e4763d in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11
      #16 0x55c939e46475 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8
      #17 0x55c939e4737e in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2
      #18 0x55c939e45f7e in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3

  0x55c93b4d59e8 is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable
  'pme_test' defined in 'tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:17:25'
  (0x55c93b4d54a0) of size 1352
  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow
  tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:764:2 in find_metric
  Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
    0x0ab9a7692ae0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x0ab9a7692af0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x0ab9a7692b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x0ab9a7692b10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x0ab9a7692b20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  =>0x0ab9a7692b30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[f9]f9 f9
    0x0ab9a7692b40: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
    0x0ab9a7692b50: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
    0x0ab9a7692b60: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x0ab9a7692b70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x0ab9a7692b80: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
  Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
    Addressable:           00
    Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
    Heap left redzone:	   fa
    Freed heap region:	   fd
    Stack left redzone:	   f1
    Stack mid redzone:	   f2
    Stack right redzone:     f3
    Stack after return:	   f5
    Stack use after scope:   f8
    Global redzone:          f9
    Global init order:	   f6
    Poisoned by user:        f7
    Container overflow:	   fc
    Array cookie:            ac
    Intra object redzone:    bb
    ASan internal:           fe
    Left alloca redzone:     ca
    Right alloca redzone:    cb
    Shadow gap:              cc
</quote>

I'm also adding the missing "Fixes" tag and setting just .name to NULL,
as doing it that way is more compact (the compiler will zero out
everything else) and the table iterators look for .name being NULL as
the sentinel marking the end of the table.

Fixes: 0a507af ("perf tests: Add parse metric test for ipc metric")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
Yonghong Song says:

====================
Currently, the bpf hashmap iterator takes a bucket_lock, a spin_lock,
before visiting each element in the bucket. This will cause a deadlock
if a map update/delete operates on an element with the same
bucket id of the visited map.

To avoid the deadlock, let us just use rcu_read_lock instead of
bucket_lock. This may result in visiting stale elements, missing some elements,
or repeating some elements, if concurrent map delete/update happens for the
same map. I think using rcu_read_lock is a reasonable compromise.
For users caring stale/missing/repeating element issues, bpf map batch
access syscall interface can be used.

Note that another approach is during bpf_iter link stage, we check
whether the iter program might be able to do update/delete to the visited
map. If it is, reject the link_create. Verifier needs to record whether
an update/delete operation happens for each map for this approach.
I just feel this checking is too specialized, hence still prefer
rcu_read_lock approach.

Patch #1 has the kernel implementation and Patch #2 added a selftest
which can trigger deadlock without Patch #1.
====================

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
The dev_iommu_priv_set() must be called after probe_device(). This fixes
a NULL pointer deference bug when booting a system with kernel cmdline
"intel_iommu=on,igfx_off", where the dev_iommu_priv_set() is abused.

The following stacktrace was produced:

 Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/isolinux/bzImage console=tty1 intel_iommu=on,igfx_off
 ...
 DMAR: Host address width 39
 DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x0
 DMAR: dmar0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap 1c0000c40660462 ecap 19e2ff0505e
 DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fed91000 flags: 0x1
 DMAR: dmar1: reg_base_addr fed91000 ver 1:0 cap d2008c40660462 ecap f050da
 DMAR: RMRR base: 0x0000009aa9f000 end: 0x0000009aabefff
 DMAR: RMRR base: 0x0000009d000000 end: 0x0000009f7fffff
 DMAR: No ATSR found
 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000038
 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
 PGD 0 P4D 0
 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI
 CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.9.0-devel+ #2
 Hardware name: LENOVO 20HGS0TW00/20HGS0TW00, BIOS N1WET46S (1.25s ) 03/30/2018
 RIP: 0010:intel_iommu_init+0xed0/0x1136
 Code: fe e9 61 02 00 00 bb f4 ff ff ff e9 57 02 00 00 48 63 d1 48 c1 e2 04 48
       03 50 20 48 8b 12 48 85 d2 74 0b 48 8b 92 d0 02 00 00 48 89 7a 38 ff c1
       e9 15 f5 ff ff 48 c7 c7 60 99 ac a7 49 c7 c7 a0
 RSP: 0000:ffff96d180073dd0 EFLAGS: 00010282
 RAX: ffff8c91037a7d20 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffffffffff
 RBP: ffff96d180073e90 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8c91039fe3c0
 R10: 0000000000000226 R11: 0000000000000226 R12: 000000000000000b
 R13: ffff8c910367c650 R14: ffffffffa8426d60 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c9107480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000000038 CR3: 00000004b100a001 CR4: 00000000003706e0
 Call Trace:
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x30
  ? call_rcu+0x10e/0x320
  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2c/0xd0
  ? rdinit_setup+0x2c/0x2c
  ? e820__memblock_setup+0x8b/0x8b
  pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x3f
  do_one_initcall+0x46/0x1e4
  kernel_init_freeable+0x169/0x1b2
  ? rest_init+0x9f/0x9f
  kernel_init+0xa/0x101
  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
 Modules linked in:
 CR2: 0000000000000038
 ---[ end trace 3653722a6f936f18 ]---

Fixes: 01b9d4e ("iommu/vt-d: Use dev_iommu_priv_get/set()")
Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Wendy Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Torsten Hilbrich <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
Luo bin says:

====================
hinic: BugFixes

The bugs fixed in this patchset have been present since the following
commits:
patch #1: Fixes: 00e57a6 ("net-next/hinic: Add Tx operation")
patch #2: Fixes: 5e126e7 ("hinic: add firmware update support")
====================

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce
with btrfs/187.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G        W
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
	 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
	 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0
	 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210
	 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90
	 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430
	 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0
	 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896
	 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
	 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x434/0xc00
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
	 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240
	 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160
	 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0
	 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
	 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
	 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
	 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
	 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
	 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
	 kthread+0x138/0x160
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
   #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
   #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G        W         5.9.0-rc2+ #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x92/0xc8
   check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
   __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0
   lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0
   ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
   evict+0xcf/0x1f0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
   super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
   do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
   shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
   shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
   balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
   kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60
   ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
   ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
   kthread+0x138/0x160
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call
btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation.  We don't want
to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where
it matters.  So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation
in order to avoid the lockdep splat.

Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected] # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
…arnings

Since commit 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static
key"), cascaded DSA setups (DSA switch port as DSA master for another
DSA switch port) are emitting this lockdep warning:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.8.0-rc1-00133-g923e4b5032dd-dirty #208 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
dhcpcd/323 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff000066dd4268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90

but task is already holding lock:
ffff00006608c268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1);
  lock(&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by dhcpcd/323:
 #0: ffffdbd1381dda18 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x24/0x30
 #1: ffff00006614b268 (_xmit_ETHER){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x28/0x48
 #2: ffff00006608c268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90

stack backtrace:
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0
 show_stack+0x20/0x30
 dump_stack+0xec/0x158
 __lock_acquire+0xca0/0x2398
 lock_acquire+0xe8/0x440
 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x64/0x90
 dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90
 dsa_slave_set_rx_mode+0x34/0x50
 __dev_set_rx_mode+0x60/0xa0
 dev_mc_sync+0x84/0x90
 dsa_slave_set_rx_mode+0x34/0x50
 __dev_set_rx_mode+0x60/0xa0
 dev_set_rx_mode+0x30/0x48
 __dev_open+0x10c/0x180
 __dev_change_flags+0x170/0x1c8
 dev_change_flags+0x2c/0x70
 devinet_ioctl+0x774/0x878
 inet_ioctl+0x348/0x3b0
 sock_do_ioctl+0x50/0x310
 sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x580
 ksys_ioctl+0xb0/0xf0
 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x180
 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x98
 el0_sync_handler+0x9c/0x1b8
 el0_sync+0x158/0x180

Since DSA never made use of the netdev API for describing links between
upper devices and lower devices, the dev->lower_level value of a DSA
switch interface would be 1, which would warn when it is a DSA master.

We can use netdev_upper_dev_link() to describe the relationship between
a DSA slave and a DSA master. To be precise, a DSA "slave" (switch port)
is an "upper" to a DSA "master" (host port). The relationship is "many
uppers to one lower", like in the case of VLAN. So, for that reason, we
use the same function as VLAN uses.

There might be a chance that somebody will try to take hold of this
interface and use it immediately after register_netdev() and before
netdev_upper_dev_link(). To avoid that, we do the registration and
linkage while holding the RTNL, and we use the RTNL-locked cousin of
register_netdev(), which is register_netdevice().

Since this warning was not there when lockdep was using dynamic keys for
addr_list_lock, we are blaming the lockdep patch itself. The network
stack _has_ been using static lockdep keys before, and it _is_ likely
that stacked DSA setups have been triggering these lockdep warnings
since forever, however I can't test very old kernels on this particular
stacked DSA setup, to ensure I'm not in fact introducing regressions.

Fixes: 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key")
Suggested-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
syzbot reported twice a lockdep issue in fib6_del() [1]
which I think is caused by net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry
having a NULL fib6_table pointer.

fib6_del() already checks for fib6_null_entry special
case, we only need to return earlier.

Bug seems to occur very rarely, I have thus chosen
a 'bug origin' that makes backports not too complex.

[1]
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1996 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
4 locks held by syz-executor.5/8095:
 #0: ffffffff8a7ea708 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ppp_release+0x178/0x240 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:401
 #1: ffff88804c422dd8 (&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_trylock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:414 [inline]
 #1: ffff88804c422dd8 (&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: fib6_run_gc+0x21b/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2312
 #2: ffffffff89bd6a40 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __fib6_clean_all+0x0/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2613
 #3: ffff8880a82e6430 (&tb->tb6_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
 #3: ffff8880a82e6430 (&tb->tb6_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __fib6_clean_all+0x107/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2245

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 8095 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
 fib6_del+0x12b4/0x1630 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1996
 fib6_clean_node+0x39b/0x570 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2180
 fib6_walk_continue+0x4aa/0x8e0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2102
 fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2150
 fib6_clean_tree+0xdb/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2230
 __fib6_clean_all+0x120/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2246
 fib6_clean_all net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2257 [inline]
 fib6_run_gc+0x113/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2320
 ndisc_netdev_event+0x217/0x350 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:1805
 notifier_call_chain+0xb5/0x200 kernel/notifier.c:83
 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xb5/0x130 net/core/dev.c:2033
 call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2045 [inline]
 call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2059 [inline]
 dev_close_many+0x30b/0x650 net/core/dev.c:1634
 rollback_registered_many+0x3a8/0x1210 net/core/dev.c:9261
 rollback_registered net/core/dev.c:9329 [inline]
 unregister_netdevice_queue+0x2dd/0x570 net/core/dev.c:10410
 unregister_netdevice include/linux/netdevice.h:2774 [inline]
 ppp_release+0x216/0x240 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:403
 __fput+0x285/0x920 fs/file_table.c:281
 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141
 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Fixes: 421842e ("net/ipv6: Add fib6_null_entry")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
Ido Schimmel says:

====================
net: Fix bridge enslavement failure

Patch #1 fixes an issue in which an upper netdev cannot be enslaved to a
bridge when it has multiple netdevs with different parent identifiers
beneath it.

Patch #2 adds a test case using two netdevsim instances.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
When compiling with DEBUG=1 on Fedora 32 I'm getting crash for 'perf
test signal':

  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function ()
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function ()
  #1  0x00000000004d62e9 in test_function () at tests/bp_signal.c:61
  #2  0x00000000004d689a in test__bp_signal (test=0xa8e280 <generic_ ...
  #3  0x00000000004b7d49 in run_test (test=0xa8e280 <generic_tests+1 ...
  #4  0x00000000004b7e7f in test_and_print (t=0xa8e280 <generic_test ...
  #5  0x00000000004b8927 in __cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdce0, ...
  ...

It's caused by the symbol __test_function being in the ".bss" section:

  $ readelf -a ./perf | less
    [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
         Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
    [28] .bss              NOBITS           0000000000c356a0  008346a0
         00000000000511f8  0000000000000000  WA       0     0     32

  $ nm perf | grep __test_function
  0000000000c68548 B __test_function

I guess most of the time we're just lucky the inline asm ended up in the
".text" section, so making it specific explicit with push and pop
section clauses.

  $ readelf -a ./perf | less
    [Nr] Name              Type             Address           Offset
         Size              EntSize          Flags  Link  Info  Align
    ...
    [13] .text             PROGBITS         0000000000431240  00031240
         0000000000306faa  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     16

  $ nm perf | grep __test_function
  00000000004d62c8 T __test_function

Committer testing:

  $ readelf -wi ~/bin/perf | grep producer -m1
    <c>   DW_AT_producer    : (indirect string, offset: 0x254a): GNU C99 10.2.1 20200723 (Red Hat 10.2.1-1) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -ggdb3 -std=gnu99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fstack-protector-all
                                                                                                                                         ^^^^^
                                                                                                                                         ^^^^^
                                                                                                                                         ^^^^^
  $

Before:

  $ perf test signal
  20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler                    : FAILED!
  $

After:

  $ perf test signal
  20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler                    : Ok
  $

Fixes: 8fd34e1 ("perf test: Improve bp_signal")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Petlan <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
The aliases were never released causing the following leaks:

  Indirect leak of 1224 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7feefb830628 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x107628)
    #1 0x56332c8f1b62 in __perf_pmu__new_alias util/pmu.c:322
    #2 0x56332c8f401f in pmu_add_cpu_aliases_map util/pmu.c:778
    #3 0x56332c792ce9 in __test__pmu_event_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:295
    #4 0x56332c792ce9 in test_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:367
    #5 0x56332c76a09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    #6 0x56332c76a09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    #7 0x56332c76ce69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695
    #8 0x56332c76ce69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #9 0x56332c7d2214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #10 0x56332c6701a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #11 0x56332c6701a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #12 0x56332c6701a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #13 0x7feefb359cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: 956a783 ("perf test: Test pmu-events aliases")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
The evsel->unit borrows a pointer of pmu event or alias instead of
owns a string.  But tool event (duration_time) passes a result of
strdup() caused a leak.

It was found by ASAN during metric test:

  Direct leak of 210 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fe366fca0b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5)
    #1 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:414
    #2 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414
    #3 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439
    #4 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096
    #5 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141
    #6 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406
    #7 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393
    #8 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_cpu tests/pmu-events.c:415
    #9 0x559fbbc28555 in test_parsing tests/pmu-events.c:498
    #10 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    #11 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    #12 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695
    #13 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #14 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #15 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #16 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #17 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #18 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: f0fbb11 ("perf stat: Implement duration_time as a proper event")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
The test_generic_metric() missed to release entries in the pctx.  Asan
reported following leak (and more):

  Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f4c9396980e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
    #1 0x55f7e748cc14 in hashmap_grow (/home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x90cc14)
    #2 0x55f7e748d497 in hashmap__insert (/home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x90d497)
    #3 0x55f7e7341667 in hashmap__set /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h:111
    #4 0x55f7e7341667 in expr__add_ref util/expr.c:120
    #5 0x55f7e7292436 in prepare_metric util/stat-shadow.c:783
    #6 0x55f7e729556d in test_generic_metric util/stat-shadow.c:858
    #7 0x55f7e712390b in compute_single tests/parse-metric.c:128
    #8 0x55f7e712390b in __compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:180
    #9 0x55f7e712446d in compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:196
    #10 0x55f7e712446d in test_dcache_l2 tests/parse-metric.c:295
    #11 0x55f7e712446d in test__parse_metric tests/parse-metric.c:355
    #12 0x55f7e70be09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    #13 0x55f7e70be09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    #14 0x55f7e70c101a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
    #15 0x55f7e70c101a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #16 0x55f7e7126214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #17 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #18 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #19 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #20 0x7f4c93492cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: 6d432c4 ("perf tools: Add test_generic_metric function")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
The metricgroup__add_metric() can find multiple match for a metric group
and it's possible to fail.  Also it can fail in the middle like in
resolve_metric() even for single metric.

In those cases, the intermediate list and ids will be leaked like:

  Direct leak of 3 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f4c938f40b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5)
    #1 0x55f7e71c1bef in __add_metric util/metricgroup.c:683
    #2 0x55f7e71c31d0 in add_metric util/metricgroup.c:906
    #3 0x55f7e71c3844 in metricgroup__add_metric util/metricgroup.c:940
    #4 0x55f7e71c488d in metricgroup__add_metric_list util/metricgroup.c:993
    #5 0x55f7e71c488d in parse_groups util/metricgroup.c:1045
    #6 0x55f7e71c60a4 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test util/metricgroup.c:1087
    #7 0x55f7e71235ae in __compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:164
    #8 0x55f7e7124650 in compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:196
    #9 0x55f7e7124650 in test_recursion_fail tests/parse-metric.c:318
    #10 0x55f7e7124650 in test__parse_metric tests/parse-metric.c:356
    #11 0x55f7e70be09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    #12 0x55f7e70be09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    #13 0x55f7e70c101a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
    #14 0x55f7e70c101a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #15 0x55f7e7126214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #16 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #17 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #18 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #19 0x7f4c93492cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: 83de0b7 ("perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
The following leaks were detected by ASAN:

  Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
    #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333
    #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59
    #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73
    #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155
    #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
    #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into kvm-master

KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.9, take #2

- Fix handling of S1 Page Table Walk permission fault at S2
  on instruction fetch
- Cleanup kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite()
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
syzbot reports a potential lock deadlock between the normal IO path and
->show_fdinfo():

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/19710 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888098ddc450 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880a11b8428 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xe9a/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8348

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
       __io_uring_show_fdinfo fs/io_uring.c:8417 [inline]
       io_uring_show_fdinfo+0x194/0xc70 fs/io_uring.c:8460
       seq_show+0x4a8/0x700 fs/proc/fd.c:65
       seq_read+0x432/0x1070 fs/seq_file.c:208
       do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:734 [inline]
       do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:721 [inline]
       do_iter_read+0x48e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:955
       vfs_readv+0xe5/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1073
       kernel_readv fs/splice.c:355 [inline]
       default_file_splice_read.constprop.0+0x4e6/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:412
       do_splice_to+0x137/0x170 fs/splice.c:871
       splice_direct_to_actor+0x307/0x980 fs/splice.c:950
       do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:1059
       do_sendfile+0x55f/0xd40 fs/read_write.c:1540
       __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1601 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1587 [inline]
       __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1587
       do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #1 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
       seq_read+0x61/0x1070 fs/seq_file.c:155
       pde_read fs/proc/inode.c:306 [inline]
       proc_reg_read+0x221/0x300 fs/proc/inode.c:318
       do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:734 [inline]
       do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:721 [inline]
       do_iter_read+0x48e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:955
       vfs_readv+0xe5/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1073
       kernel_readv fs/splice.c:355 [inline]
       default_file_splice_read.constprop.0+0x4e6/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:412
       do_splice_to+0x137/0x170 fs/splice.c:871
       splice_direct_to_actor+0x307/0x980 fs/splice.c:950
       do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:1059
       do_sendfile+0x55f/0xd40 fs/read_write.c:1540
       __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1601 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1587 [inline]
       __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1587
       do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #0 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441
       lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write+0x228/0x450 fs/super.c:1672
       io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296
       io_issue_sqe+0x18f/0x5c50 fs/io_uring.c:5719
       __io_queue_sqe+0x280/0x1160 fs/io_uring.c:6175
       io_queue_sqe+0x692/0xfa0 fs/io_uring.c:6254
       io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6324 [inline]
       io_submit_sqes+0x1761/0x2400 fs/io_uring.c:6521
       __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xeac/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8349
       do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  sb_writers#4 --> &p->lock --> &ctx->uring_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
                               lock(&p->lock);
                               lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
  lock(sb_writers#4);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.2/19710:
 #0: ffff8880a11b8428 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xe9a/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8348

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 19710 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
 check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441
 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029
 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
 __sb_start_write+0x228/0x450 fs/super.c:1672
 io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296
 io_issue_sqe+0x18f/0x5c50 fs/io_uring.c:5719
 __io_queue_sqe+0x280/0x1160 fs/io_uring.c:6175
 io_queue_sqe+0x692/0xfa0 fs/io_uring.c:6254
 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6324 [inline]
 io_submit_sqes+0x1761/0x2400 fs/io_uring.c:6521
 __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xeac/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8349
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x45e179
Code: 3d b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 0b b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f1194e74c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001aa
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000082c0 RCX: 000000000045e179
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000118cf98 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000118cf4c
R13: 00007ffd1aa5756f R14: 00007f1194e759c0 R15: 000000000118cf4c

Fix this by just not diving into details if we fail to trylock the
io_uring mutex. We know the ctx isn't going away during this operation,
but we cannot safely iterate buffers/files/personalities if we don't
hold the io_uring mutex.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
This patch is to add a new variable 'nested_level' into the net_device
structure.
This variable will be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() of
dev->addr_list_lock.

netif_addr_lock() can be called recursively so spin_lock_nested() is
used instead of spin_lock() and dev->lower_level is used as a parameter
of spin_lock_nested().
But, dev->lower_level value can be updated while it is being used.
So, lockdep would warn a possible deadlock scenario.

When a stacked interface is deleted, netif_{uc | mc}_sync() is
called recursively.
So, spin_lock_nested() is called recursively too.
At this moment, the dev->lower_level variable is used as a parameter of it.
dev->lower_level value is updated when interfaces are being unlinked/linked
immediately.
Thus, After unlinking, dev->lower_level shouldn't be a parameter of
spin_lock_nested().

    A (macvlan)
    |
    B (vlan)
    |
    C (bridge)
    |
    D (macvlan)
    |
    E (vlan)
    |
    F (bridge)

    A->lower_level : 6
    B->lower_level : 5
    C->lower_level : 4
    D->lower_level : 3
    E->lower_level : 2
    F->lower_level : 1

When an interface 'A' is removed, it releases resources.
At this moment, netif_addr_lock() would be called.
Then, netdev_upper_dev_unlink() is called recursively.
Then dev->lower_level is updated.
There is no problem.

But, when the bridge module is removed, 'C' and 'F' interfaces
are removed at once.
If 'F' is removed first, a lower_level value is like below.
    A->lower_level : 5
    B->lower_level : 4
    C->lower_level : 3
    D->lower_level : 2
    E->lower_level : 1
    F->lower_level : 1

Then, 'C' is removed. at this moment, netif_addr_lock() is called
recursively.
The ordering is like this.
C(3)->D(2)->E(1)->F(1)
At this moment, the lower_level value of 'E' and 'F' are the same.
So, lockdep warns a possible deadlock scenario.

In order to avoid this problem, a new variable 'nested_level' is added.
This value is the same as dev->lower_level - 1.
But this value is updated in rtnl_unlock().
So, this variable can be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() safely
in the rtnl context.

Test commands:
   ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
   ip link add vlan1 link br0 type vlan id 10
   ip link add macvlan2 link vlan1 type macvlan
   ip link add br3 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
   ip link set macvlan2 master br3
   ip link add vlan4 link br3 type vlan id 10
   ip link add macvlan5 link vlan4 type macvlan
   ip link add br6 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
   ip link set macvlan5 master br6
   ip link add vlan7 link br6 type vlan id 10
   ip link add macvlan8 link vlan7 type macvlan

   ip link set br0 up
   ip link set vlan1 up
   ip link set macvlan2 up
   ip link set br3 up
   ip link set vlan4 up
   ip link set macvlan5 up
   ip link set br6 up
   ip link set vlan7 up
   ip link set macvlan8 up
   modprobe -rv bridge

Splat looks like:
[   36.057436][  T744] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[   36.058848][  T744] 5.9.0-rc6+ #728 Not tainted
[   36.059959][  T744] --------------------------------------------
[   36.061391][  T744] ip/744 is trying to acquire lock:
[   36.062590][  T744] ffff8c4767509280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[   36.064922][  T744]
[   36.064922][  T744] but task is already holding lock:
[   36.066626][  T744] ffff8c4767769280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_add+0x1e/0x60
[   36.068851][  T744]
[   36.068851][  T744] other info that might help us debug this:
[   36.070731][  T744]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   36.070731][  T744]
[   36.072497][  T744]        CPU0
[   36.073238][  T744]        ----
[   36.074007][  T744]   lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[   36.075290][  T744]   lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[   36.076590][  T744]
[   36.076590][  T744]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   36.076590][  T744]
[   36.078515][  T744]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   36.078515][  T744]
[   36.080491][  T744] 3 locks held by ip/744:
[   36.081471][  T744]  #0: ffffffff98571df0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x236/0x490
[   36.083614][  T744]  #1: ffff8c4767769280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_add+0x1e/0x60
[   36.085942][  T744]  #2: ffff8c476c8da280 (&bridge_netdev_addr_lock_key/4){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_sync+0x39/0x80
[   36.088400][  T744]
[   36.088400][  T744] stack backtrace:
[   36.089772][  T744] CPU: 6 PID: 744 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6+ #728
[   36.091364][  T744] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[   36.093630][  T744] Call Trace:
[   36.094416][  T744]  dump_stack+0x77/0x9b
[   36.095385][  T744]  __lock_acquire+0xbc3/0x1f40
[   36.096522][  T744]  lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[   36.097540][  T744]  ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[   36.098657][  T744]  ? rtmsg_ifinfo+0x1f/0x30
[   36.099711][  T744]  ? __dev_notify_flags+0xa5/0xf0
[   36.100874][  T744]  ? rtnl_is_locked+0x11/0x20
[   36.101967][  T744]  ? __dev_set_promiscuity+0x7b/0x1a0
[   36.103230][  T744]  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x70
[   36.104348][  T744]  ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[   36.105461][  T744]  dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[   36.106532][  T744]  dev_set_promiscuity+0x36/0x50
[   36.107692][  T744]  __dev_set_promiscuity+0x123/0x1a0
[   36.108929][  T744]  dev_set_promiscuity+0x1e/0x50
[   36.110093][  T744]  br_port_set_promisc+0x1f/0x40 [bridge]
[   36.111415][  T744]  br_manage_promisc+0x8b/0xe0 [bridge]
[   36.112728][  T744]  __dev_set_promiscuity+0x123/0x1a0
[   36.113967][  T744]  ? __hw_addr_sync_one+0x23/0x50
[   36.115135][  T744]  __dev_set_rx_mode+0x68/0x90
[   36.116249][  T744]  dev_uc_sync+0x70/0x80
[   36.117244][  T744]  dev_uc_add+0x50/0x60
[   36.118223][  T744]  macvlan_open+0x18e/0x1f0 [macvlan]
[   36.119470][  T744]  __dev_open+0xd6/0x170
[   36.120470][  T744]  __dev_change_flags+0x181/0x1d0
[   36.121644][  T744]  dev_change_flags+0x23/0x60
[   36.122741][  T744]  do_setlink+0x30a/0x11e0
[   36.123778][  T744]  ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[   36.124929][  T744]  ? __nla_validate_parse.part.6+0x45/0x8e0
[   36.126309][  T744]  ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[   36.127457][  T744]  __rtnl_newlink+0x546/0x8e0
[   36.128560][  T744]  ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[   36.129623][  T744]  ? deactivate_slab.isra.85+0x6a1/0x850
[   36.130946][  T744]  ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[   36.132102][  T744]  ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[   36.133176][  T744]  ? is_bpf_text_address+0x5/0xe0
[   36.134364][  T744]  ? rtnl_newlink+0x2e/0x70
[   36.135445][  T744]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x32/0x60
[   36.136771][  T744]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2d8/0x380
[   36.138070][  T744]  ? rtnl_newlink+0x2e/0x70
[   36.139164][  T744]  rtnl_newlink+0x47/0x70
[ ... ]

Fixes: 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2020
When closing and freeing the source device we could end up doing our
final blkdev_put() on the bdev, which will grab the bd_mutex.  As such
we want to be holding as few locks as possible, so move this call
outside of the dev_replace->lock_finishing_cancel_unmount lock.  Since
we're modifying the fs_devices we need to make sure we're holding the
uuid_mutex here, so take that as well.

There's a report from syzbot probably hitting one of the cases where
the bd_mutex and device_list_mutex are taken in the wrong order, however
it's not with device replace, like this patch fixes. As there's no
reproducer available so far, we can't verify the fix.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84a0634dc5d21d488419

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.0/6878 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88804c17d780 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
	 __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
	 btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x281/0xf90 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5255
	 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2f3/0x700 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2109
	 __btrfs_end_transaction+0xf5/0x690 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:916
	 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3807 [inline]
	 find_free_extent+0x23b7/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206
	 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063
	 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838
	 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439
	 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653
	 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249
	 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370
	 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352
	 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461
	 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721
	 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894
	 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline]
	 wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080
	 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
	 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415
	 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

  -> #3 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
	 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
	 __sb_start_write+0x234/0x470 fs/super.c:1672
	 sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1690 [inline]
	 start_transaction+0xbe7/0x1170 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:624
	 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3789 [inline]
	 find_free_extent+0x25e1/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206
	 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063
	 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838
	 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439
	 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653
	 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249
	 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370
	 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352
	 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461
	 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721
	 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894
	 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline]
	 wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080
	 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
	 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415
	 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

  -> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 __flush_work+0x60e/0xac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3041
	 wb_shutdown+0x180/0x220 mm/backing-dev.c:355
	 bdi_unregister+0x174/0x590 mm/backing-dev.c:872
	 del_gendisk+0x820/0xa10 block/genhd.c:933
	 loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2192 [inline]
	 loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline]
	 loop_control_ioctl+0x3b1/0x480 drivers/block/loop.c:2257
	 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
	 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
	 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
	 __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
	 lo_open+0x19/0xd0 drivers/block/loop.c:1893
	 __blkdev_get+0x759/0x1aa0 fs/block_dev.c:1507
	 blkdev_get fs/block_dev.c:1639 [inline]
	 blkdev_open+0x227/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1753
	 do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:817
	 do_open fs/namei.c:3251 [inline]
	 path_openat+0x1b9a/0x2730 fs/namei.c:3368
	 do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3395
	 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1168
	 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1184 [inline]
	 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1192 [inline]
	 __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1188 [inline]
	 __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1188
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
	 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
	 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
	 __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426
	 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006
	 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
	 __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
	 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804
	 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline]
	 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline]
	 btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline]
	 close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161
	 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline]
	 btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179
	 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464
	 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335
	 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366
	 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118
	 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141
	 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
	 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline]
	 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190
	 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &bdev->bd_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
				 lock(sb_internal#2);
				 lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
    lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by syz-executor.0/6878:
   #0: ffff88809070c0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#70){++++}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xa5/0xd0 fs/super.c:365
   #1: ffffffff8a5b37a8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_close_devices+0x23/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1178
   #2: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 6878 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
   dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
   check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426
   lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006
   __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
   __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
   blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804
   btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline]
   btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline]
   btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline]
   close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161
   close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline]
   btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179
   close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149
   generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464
   kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108
   btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265
   deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335
   deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366
   cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118
   task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141
   tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
   exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline]
   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190
   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x460027
  RSP: 002b:00007fff59216328 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000076035 RCX: 0000000000460027
  RDX: 0000000000403188 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fff592163d0
  RBP: 0000000000000333 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000b
  R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff59217460
  R13: 0000000002df2a60 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff59217460

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
[ add syzbot reference ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
@ojeda ojeda removed this from the Rust features milestone Nov 28, 2020
@ojeda ojeda added the required label Nov 28, 2020
@ojeda ojeda unpinned this issue Nov 28, 2020
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2020
Ido Schimmel says:

====================
mlxsw: Couple of fixes

Patch #1 fixes firmware flashing when CONFIG_MLXSW_CORE=y and
CONFIG_MLXFW=m.

Patch #2 prevents EMAD transactions from needlessly failing when the
system is under heavy load by using exponential backoff.

Please consider patch #2 for stable.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2020
When running test case btrfs/017 from fstests, lockdep reported the
following splat:

  [ 1297.067385] ======================================================
  [ 1297.067708] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  [ 1297.068022] 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 Not tainted
  [ 1297.068322] ------------------------------------------------------
  [ 1297.068629] btrfs/189080 is trying to acquire lock:
  [ 1297.068929] ffff9f2725731690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.069274]
		 but task is already holding lock:
  [ 1297.069868] ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.070219]
		 which lock already depends on the new lock.

  [ 1297.071131]
		 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  [ 1297.071721]
		 -> #1 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
  [ 1297.072375]        lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
  [ 1297.072710]        __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xb30
  [ 1297.073061]        btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x59/0x6a0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.073421]        create_subvol+0x194/0x990 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.073780]        btrfs_mksubvol+0x3fb/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.074133]        __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x119/0x1a0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.074498]        btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x58/0x80 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.074872]        btrfs_ioctl+0x1a90/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.075245]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [ 1297.075617]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [ 1297.075993]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [ 1297.076380]
		 -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
  [ 1297.077166]        check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
  [ 1297.077572]        __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110
  [ 1297.077984]        lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
  [ 1297.078411]        start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.078853]        btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.079323]        btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.079789]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [ 1297.080232]        do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [ 1297.080680]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [ 1297.081139]
		 other info that might help us debug this:

  [ 1297.082536]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

  [ 1297.083510]        CPU0                    CPU1
  [ 1297.084005]        ----                    ----
  [ 1297.084500]   lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
  [ 1297.084994]                                lock(sb_internal#2);
  [ 1297.085485]                                lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
  [ 1297.085974]   lock(sb_internal#2);
  [ 1297.086454]
		  *** DEADLOCK ***
  [ 1297.087880] 3 locks held by btrfs/189080:
  [ 1297.088324]  #0: ffff9f2725731470 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0xa73/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.088799]  #1: ffff9f2702b60cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.089284]  #2: ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.089771]
		 stack backtrace:
  [ 1297.090662] CPU: 5 PID: 189080 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1
  [ 1297.091132] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [ 1297.092123] Call Trace:
  [ 1297.092629]  dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5
  [ 1297.093115]  check_noncircular+0xff/0x110
  [ 1297.093596]  check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60
  [ 1297.094076]  ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
  [ 1297.094553]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
  [ 1297.095029]  __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110
  [ 1297.095510]  lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490
  [ 1297.095993]  ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.096476]  start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.096962]  ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.097451]  btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.097941]  ? btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.098429]  btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [ 1297.098904]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x20c/0x430
  [ 1297.099382]  ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
  [ 1297.099854]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10
  [ 1297.100328]  ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
  [ 1297.100801]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x12/0x180
  [ 1297.101272]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [ 1297.101739]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [ 1297.102207]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [ 1297.102673]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [ 1297.103148] RIP: 0033:0x7f773ff65d87

This is because during the quota enable ioctl we lock first the mutex
qgroup_ioctl_lock and then start a transaction, and starting a transaction
acquires a fs freeze semaphore (at the VFS level). However, every other
code path, except for the quota disable ioctl path, we do the opposite:
we start a transaction and then lock the mutex.

So fix this by making the quota enable and disable paths to start the
transaction without having the mutex locked, and then, after starting the
transaction, lock the mutex and check if some other task already enabled
or disabled the quotas, bailing with success if that was the case.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.12, take Rust-for-Linux#2

- Fix the guest view of the ID registers, making the relevant fields
  writable from userspace (affecting ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)

- Correcly expose S1PIE to guests, fixing a regression introduced
  in 6.12-rc1 with the S1POE support

- Fix the recycling of stage-2 shadow MMUs by tracking the context
  (are we allowed to block or not) as well as the recycling state

- Address a couple of issues with the vgic when userspace misconfigures
  the emulation, resulting in various splats. Headaches courtesy
  of our Syzkaller friends
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
Fix possible use-after-free in 'taprio_dump()' by adding RCU
read-side critical section there. Never seen on x86 but
found on a KASAN-enabled arm64 system when investigating
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa:

[T15862] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in taprio_dump+0xa0c/0xbb0
[T15862] Read of size 4 at addr ffff0000d4bb88f8 by task repro/15862
[T15862]
[T15862] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15862 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1-00293-gdefaf1a2113a-dirty Rust-for-Linux#2
[T15862] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-5.fc40 05/24/2024
[T15862] Call trace:
[T15862]  dump_backtrace+0x20c/0x220
[T15862]  show_stack+0x2c/0x40
[T15862]  dump_stack_lvl+0xf8/0x174
[T15862]  print_report+0x170/0x4d8
[T15862]  kasan_report+0xb8/0x1d4
[T15862]  __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x20/0x2c
[T15862]  taprio_dump+0xa0c/0xbb0
[T15862]  tc_fill_qdisc+0x540/0x1020
[T15862]  qdisc_notify.isra.0+0x330/0x3a0
[T15862]  tc_modify_qdisc+0x7b8/0x1838
[T15862]  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3c8/0xc20
[T15862]  netlink_rcv_skb+0x1f8/0x3d4
[T15862]  rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x40
[T15862]  netlink_unicast+0x51c/0x790
[T15862]  netlink_sendmsg+0x79c/0xc20
[T15862]  __sock_sendmsg+0xe0/0x1a0
[T15862]  ____sys_sendmsg+0x6c0/0x840
[T15862]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x1f0
[T15862]  __sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1d0
[T15862]  __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x74/0xb0
[T15862]  invoke_syscall+0x88/0x2e0
[T15862]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xe4/0x2a0
[T15862]  do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60
[T15862]  el0_svc+0x50/0x184
[T15862]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c
[T15862]  el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
[T15862]
[T15862] Allocated by task 15857:
[T15862]  kasan_save_stack+0x3c/0x70
[T15862]  kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c
[T15862]  kasan_save_alloc_info+0x40/0x60
[T15862]  __kasan_kmalloc+0xd4/0xe0
[T15862]  __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x194/0x334
[T15862]  taprio_change+0x45c/0x2fe0
[T15862]  tc_modify_qdisc+0x6a8/0x1838
[T15862]  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3c8/0xc20
[T15862]  netlink_rcv_skb+0x1f8/0x3d4
[T15862]  rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x40
[T15862]  netlink_unicast+0x51c/0x790
[T15862]  netlink_sendmsg+0x79c/0xc20
[T15862]  __sock_sendmsg+0xe0/0x1a0
[T15862]  ____sys_sendmsg+0x6c0/0x840
[T15862]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x1f0
[T15862]  __sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1d0
[T15862]  __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x74/0xb0
[T15862]  invoke_syscall+0x88/0x2e0
[T15862]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xe4/0x2a0
[T15862]  do_el0_svc+0x44/0x60
[T15862]  el0_svc+0x50/0x184
[T15862]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c
[T15862]  el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
[T15862]
[T15862] Freed by task 6192:
[T15862]  kasan_save_stack+0x3c/0x70
[T15862]  kasan_save_track+0x20/0x3c
[T15862]  kasan_save_free_info+0x4c/0x80
[T15862]  poison_slab_object+0x110/0x160
[T15862]  __kasan_slab_free+0x3c/0x74
[T15862]  kfree+0x134/0x3c0
[T15862]  taprio_free_sched_cb+0x18c/0x220
[T15862]  rcu_core+0x920/0x1b7c
[T15862]  rcu_core_si+0x10/0x1c
[T15862]  handle_softirqs+0x2e8/0xd64
[T15862]  __do_softirq+0x14/0x20

Fixes: 18cdd2f ("net/sched: taprio: taprio_dump and taprio_change are protected by rtnl_mutex")
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2024
Hou Tao says:

====================
Add the missing BPF_LINK_TYPE invocation for sockmap

From: Hou Tao <[email protected]>

Hi,

The tiny patch set fixes the out-of-bound read problem when reading the
fdinfo of sock map link fd. And in order to spot such omission early for
the newly-added link type in the future, it also checks the validity of
the link->type and adds a WARN_ONCE() for missed invocation.

Please see individual patches for more details. And comments are always
welcome.

v3:
  * patch Rust-for-Linux#2: check and warn the validity of link->type instead of
    adding a static assertion for bpf_link_type_strs array.

v2: http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Fraxoor pushed a commit to Fraxoor/ubuntu_ava that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2024
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.74.1 to 1.75.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].

See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").

# Unstable features

The `const_maybe_uninit_zeroed` unstable feature [3] was stabilized in
Rust 1.75.0, which we were using in the PHYLIB abstractions.

The only unstable features allowed to be used outside the `kernel` crate
are still `new_uninit,offset_of`, though other code to be upstreamed
may increase the list.

Please see [4] for details.

# Other improvements

Rust 1.75.0 stabilized `pointer_byte_offsets` [5] which we could
potentially use as an alternative for `ptr_metadata` in the future.

# Required changes

For this upgrade, no changes were required (i.e. on our side).

# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing

The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded
at once.

There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from
upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates
needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer
infallible APIs coming from upstream.

Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative
approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and
the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only,
especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match
the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream.

Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in
the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot
potentially unintended changes to our additions.

To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following
to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream
Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after
applying this patch:

    # Get the difference with respect to the old version.
    git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
    git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
        cut -d/ -f3- |
        grep -Fv README.md |
        xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
    git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch
    git -C linux restore rust/alloc

    # Apply this patch.
    git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch

    # Get the difference with respect to the new version.
    git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
    git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
        cut -d/ -f3- |
        grep -Fv README.md |
        xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
    git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch
    git -C linux restore rust/alloc

Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first
approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second
approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended.

Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1750-2023-12-28 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: rust-lang/rust#91850 [3]
Link: Rust-for-Linux/linux#2 [4]
Link: rust-lang/rust#96283 [5]
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c5fed8c)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Pisati <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
…tified'

Petr Machata says:

====================
net: ndo_fdb_add/del: Have drivers report whether they notified

Currently when FDB entries are added to or deleted from a VXLAN netdevice,
the VXLAN driver emits one notification, including the VXLAN-specific
attributes. The core however always sends a notification as well, a generic
one. Thus two notifications are unnecessarily sent for these operations. A
similar situation comes up with bridge driver, which also emits
notifications on its own.

 # ip link add name vx type vxlan id 1000 dstport 4789
 # bridge monitor fdb &
 [1] 1981693
 # bridge fdb add de:ad:be:ef:13:37 dev vx self dst 192.0.2.1
 de:ad:be:ef:13:37 dev vx dst 192.0.2.1 self permanent
 de:ad:be:ef:13:37 dev vx self permanent

In order to prevent this duplicity, add a parameter, bool *notified, to
ndo_fdb_add and ndo_fdb_del. The flag is primed to false, and if the callee
sends a notification on its own, it sets the flag to true, thus informing
the core that it should not generate another notification.

Patches #1 to #2 are concerned with the above.

In the remaining patches, #3 to #7, add a selftest. This takes place across
several patches. Many of the helpers we would like to use for the test are
in forwarding/lib.sh, whereas net/ is a more suitable place for the test,
so the libraries need to be massaged a bit first.
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2024
Commit bab1c29 ("LoongArch: Fix sleeping in atomic context in
setup_tlb_handler()") changes the gfp flag from GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC
for alloc_pages_node(). However, for PREEMPT_RT kernels we can still get
a "sleeping in atomic context" error:

[    0.372259] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[    0.372266] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
[    0.372268] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[    0.372270] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
[    0.372272] 3 locks held by swapper/1/0:
[    0.372274]  #0: 900000000c9f5e60 (&pcp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: get_page_from_freelist+0x524/0x1c60
[    0.372294]  Rust-for-Linux#1: 90000000087013b8 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rt_spin_trylock+0x50/0x140
[    0.372305]  Rust-for-Linux#2: 900000047fffd388 (&zone->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __rmqueue_pcplist+0x30c/0xea0
[    0.372314] irq event stamp: 0
[    0.372316] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[    0.372322] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<9000000005947320>] copy_process+0x9c0/0x26e0
[    0.372329] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<9000000005947320>] copy_process+0x9c0/0x26e0
[    0.372335] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[    0.372341] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7+ #1891
[    0.372346] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB/Loongson-LS3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB, BIOS vUDK2018-LoongArch-V2.0.0-prebeta9 10/21/2022
[    0.372349] Stack : 0000000000000089 9000000005a0db9c 90000000071519c8 9000000100388000
[    0.372486]         900000010038b890 0000000000000000 900000010038b898 9000000007e53788
[    0.372492]         900000000815bcc8 900000000815bcc0 900000010038b700 0000000000000001
[    0.372498]         0000000000000001 4b031894b9d6b725 00000000055ec000 9000000100338fc0
[    0.372503]         00000000000000c4 0000000000000001 000000000000002d 0000000000000003
[    0.372509]         0000000000000030 0000000000000003 00000000055ec000 0000000000000003
[    0.372515]         900000000806d000 9000000007e53788 00000000000000b0 0000000000000004
[    0.372521]         0000000000000000 0000000000000000 900000000c9f5f10 0000000000000000
[    0.372526]         90000000076f12d8 9000000007e53788 9000000005924778 0000000000000000
[    0.372532]         00000000000000b0 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000070000
[    0.372537]         ...
[    0.372540] Call Trace:
[    0.372542] [<9000000005924778>] show_stack+0x38/0x180
[    0.372548] [<90000000071519c4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x94/0xe4
[    0.372555] [<900000000599b880>] __might_resched+0x1a0/0x260
[    0.372561] [<90000000071675cc>] rt_spin_lock+0x4c/0x140
[    0.372565] [<9000000005cbb768>] __rmqueue_pcplist+0x308/0xea0
[    0.372570] [<9000000005cbed84>] get_page_from_freelist+0x564/0x1c60
[    0.372575] [<9000000005cc0d98>] __alloc_pages_noprof+0x218/0x1820
[    0.372580] [<900000000593b36c>] tlb_init+0x1ac/0x298
[    0.372585] [<9000000005924b74>] per_cpu_trap_init+0x114/0x140
[    0.372589] [<9000000005921964>] cpu_probe+0x4e4/0xa60
[    0.372592] [<9000000005934874>] start_secondary+0x34/0xc0
[    0.372599] [<900000000715615c>] smpboot_entry+0x64/0x6c

This is because in PREEMPT_RT kernels normal spinlocks are replaced by
rt spinlocks and rt_spin_lock() will cause sleeping. Fix it by disabling
NUMA optimization completely for PREEMPT_RT kernels.

Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2024
…ux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 changes for 6.13, part Rust-for-Linux#2

 - Constrain invalidations from GICR_INVLPIR to only affect the LPI
   INTID space

 - Set of robustness improvements to the management of vgic irqs and GIC
   ITS table entries

 - Fix compilation issue w/ CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y where
   set_sysreg_masks() wasn't getting inlined, breaking check for a
   constant sysreg index

 - Correct KVM's vPMU overflow condition to match the architecture for
   hyp and non-hyp counters
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2024
…ndex

Intel SoundWire machine driver always uses Pin number 2 and above.
Currently, the pin number is used as the FW DAI index directly. As a
result, FW DAI 0 and 1 are never used. That worked fine because we use
up to 2 DAIs in a SDW link. Convert the topology pin index to ALH dai
index, the mapping is using 2-off indexing, iow, pin Rust-for-Linux#2 is ALH dai #0.

The issue exists since beginning. And the Fixes tag is the first commit
that this commit can be applied.

Fixes: b66bfc3 ("ASoC: SOF: sof-audio: Fix broken early bclk feature for SSP")
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Darksonn pushed a commit to Darksonn/linux that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2024
…to HEAD

KVM/riscv changes for 6.13 part Rust-for-Linux#2

- Svade and Svadu extension support for Host and Guest/VM
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
Kernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such
as following calltrace:

PID: 23644    TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "nvme"
 #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15
 #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014
 #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1
 #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a
 #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006
 #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce
 #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced
 #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b
 #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362
 #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25
    RIP: 00007fda7891d574  RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958  RFLAGS: 00000202
    RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 000055e8122a4d90  RCX: 00007fda7891d574
    RDX: 000000000000012b  RSI: 000055e8122a4d90  RDI: 0000000000000004
    RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0   R8: 000000000000012b   R9: 000055e8122a4d90
    R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000202  R12: 0000000000000004
    R13: 000055e8122923c0  R14: 000000000000012b  R15: 00007fda78a54500
    ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001  CS: 0033  SS: 002b

This due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot
to unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the
pending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here
try to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and
simplify the code.

Fixes: 958dc1d ("nvme-rdma: add clean action for failed reconnection")
Reported-by: Yingfu.zhou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunguang.xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yue.zhao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
Konstantin Shkolnyy says:

====================
vsock/test: fix wrong setsockopt() parameters

Parameters were created using wrong C types, which caused them to be of
wrong size on some architectures, causing problems.

The problem with SO_RCVLOWAT was found on s390 (big endian), while x86-64
didn't show it. After the fix, all tests pass on s390.
Then Stefano Garzarella pointed out that SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls might have
a similar problem, which turned out to be true, hence, the second patch.

Changes for v8:
- Fix whitespace warnings from "checkpatch.pl --strict"
- Add maintainers to Cc:
Changes for v7:
- Rebase on top of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
- Add the "net" tags to the subjects
Changes for v6:
- rework the patch #3 to avoid creating a new file for new functions,
and exclude vsock_perf from calling the new functions.
- add "Reviewed-by:" to the patch #2.
Changes for v5:
- in the patch #2 replace the introduced uint64_t with unsigned long long
to match documentation
- add a patch #3 that verifies every setsockopt() call.
Changes for v4:
- add "Reviewed-by:" to the first patch, and add a second patch fixing
SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls, which depends on the first one (hence, it's now
a patch series.)
Changes for v3:
- fix the same problem in vsock_perf and update commit message
Changes for v2:
- add "Fixes:" lines to the commit message
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
Add more test cases for LPM trie in test_maps:

1) test_lpm_trie_update_flags
It constructs various use cases for BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST and check
whether the return value of update operation is expected.

2) test_lpm_trie_update_full_maps
It tests the update operations on a full LPM trie map. Adding new node
will fail and overwriting the value of existed node will succeed.

3) test_lpm_trie_iterate_strs and test_lpm_trie_iterate_ints
There two test cases test whether the iteration through get_next_key is
sorted and expected. These two test cases delete the minimal key after
each iteration and check whether next iteration returns the second
minimal key. The only difference between these two test cases is the
former one saves strings in the LPM trie and the latter saves integers.
Without the fix of get_next_key, these two cases will fail as shown
below:
  test_lpm_trie_iterate_strs(1091):FAIL:iterate #2 got abc exp abS
  test_lpm_trie_iterate_ints(1142):FAIL:iterate #1 got 0x2 exp 0x1

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
Hou Tao says:

====================
This patch set fixes several issues for LPM trie. These issues were
found during adding new test cases or were reported by syzbot.

The patch set is structured as follows:

Patch #1~#2 are clean-ups for lpm_trie_update_elem().
Patch #3 handles BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST correctly for LPM trie.
Patch #4 fixes the accounting of n_entries when doing in-place update.
Patch #5 fixes the exact match condition in trie_get_next_key() and it
may skip keys when the passed key is not found in the map.
Patch #6~#7 switch from kmalloc() to bpf memory allocator for LPM trie
to fix several lock order warnings reported by syzbot. It also enables
raw_spinlock_t for LPM trie again. After these changes, the LPM trie will
be closer to being usable in any context (though the reentrance check of
trie->lock is still missing, but it is on my todo list).
Patch #8: move test_lpm_map to map_tests to make it run regularly.
Patch #9: add test cases for the issues fixed by patch #3~#5.

Please see individual patches for more details. Comments are always
welcome.

Change Log:
v3:
  * patch #2: remove the unnecessary NULL-init for im_node
  * patch #6: alloc the leaf node before disabling IRQ to low
    the possibility of -ENOMEM when leaf_size is large; Free
    these nodes outside the trie lock (Suggested by Alexei)
  * collect review and ack tags (Thanks for Toke & Daniel)

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
  * collect review tags (Thanks for Toke)
  * drop "Add bpf_mem_cache_is_mergeable() helper" patch
  * patch #3~#4: add fix tag
  * patch #4: rename the helper to trie_check_add_elem() and increase
    n_entries in it.
  * patch #6: use one bpf mem allocator and update commit message to
    clarify that using bpf mem allocator is more appropriate.
  * patch #7: update commit message to add the possible max running time
    for update operation.
  * patch #9: update commit message to specify the purpose of these test
    cases.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
Since the netlink attribute range validation provides inclusive
checking, the *max* of attribute NL80211_ATTR_MLO_LINK_ID should be
IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS - 1 otherwise causing an off-by-one.

One crash stack for demonstration:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in ieee80211_tx_control_port+0x3b6/0xca0 net/mac80211/tx.c:5939
Read of size 6 at addr 001102080000000c by task fuzzer.386/9508

CPU: 1 PID: 9508 Comm: syz.1.386 Not tainted 6.1.70 #2
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x177/0x231 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 print_report+0xe0/0x750 mm/kasan/report.c:398
 kasan_report+0x139/0x170 mm/kasan/report.c:495
 kasan_check_range+0x287/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189
 memcpy+0x25/0x60 mm/kasan/shadow.c:65
 ieee80211_tx_control_port+0x3b6/0xca0 net/mac80211/tx.c:5939
 rdev_tx_control_port net/wireless/rdev-ops.h:761 [inline]
 nl80211_tx_control_port+0x7b3/0xc40 net/wireless/nl80211.c:15453
 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x22e/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:756
 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline]
 genl_rcv_msg+0x539/0x740 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x1de/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2508
 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1326 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x74b/0x8c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1352
 netlink_sendmsg+0x882/0xb90 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1874
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:716 [inline]
 __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:728 [inline]
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5cc/0x8f0 net/socket.c:2499
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x21c/0x290 net/socket.c:2553
 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2582 [inline]
 __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2591 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendmsg+0x19e/0x270 net/socket.c:2589
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Update the policy to ensure correct validation.

Fixes: 7b0a0e3 ("wifi: cfg80211: do some rework towards MLO link APIs")
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Cengiz Can <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
Its used from trace__run(), for the 'perf trace' live mode, i.e. its
strace-like, non-perf.data file processing mode, the most common one.

The trace__run() function will set trace->host using machine__new_host()
that is supposed to give a machine instance representing the running
machine, and since we'll use perf_env__arch_strerrno() to get the right
errno -> string table, we need to use machine->env, so initialize it in
machine__new_host().

Before the patch:

  (gdb) run trace --errno-summary -a sleep 1
  <SNIP>
   Summary of events:

   gvfs-afc-volume (3187), 2 events, 0.0%

     syscall            calls  errors  total       min       avg       max       stddev
                                       (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
     --------------- --------  ------ -------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
     pselect6               1      0     0.000     0.000     0.000     0.000      0.00%

   GUsbEventThread (3519), 2 events, 0.0%

     syscall            calls  errors  total       min       avg       max       stddev
                                       (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
     --------------- --------  ------ -------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
     poll                   1      0     0.000     0.000     0.000     0.000      0.00%
  <SNIP>
  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x00000000005caba0 in perf_env__arch_strerrno (env=0x0, err=110) at util/env.c:478
  478		if (env->arch_strerrno == NULL)
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x00000000005caba0 in perf_env__arch_strerrno (env=0x0, err=110) at util/env.c:478
  #1  0x00000000004b75d2 in thread__dump_stats (ttrace=0x14f58f0, trace=0x7fffffffa5b0, fp=0x7ffff6ff74e0 <_IO_2_1_stderr_>) at builtin-trace.c:4673
  #2  0x00000000004b78bf in trace__fprintf_thread (fp=0x7ffff6ff74e0 <_IO_2_1_stderr_>, thread=0x10fa0b0, trace=0x7fffffffa5b0) at builtin-trace.c:4708
  #3  0x00000000004b7ad9 in trace__fprintf_thread_summary (trace=0x7fffffffa5b0, fp=0x7ffff6ff74e0 <_IO_2_1_stderr_>) at builtin-trace.c:4747
  #4  0x00000000004b656e in trace__run (trace=0x7fffffffa5b0, argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at builtin-trace.c:4456
  #5  0x00000000004ba43e in cmd_trace (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at builtin-trace.c:5487
  #6  0x00000000004c0414 in run_builtin (p=0xec3068 <commands+648>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:351
  #7  0x00000000004c06bb in handle_internal_command (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:404
  #8  0x00000000004c0814 in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffdc4c, argv=0x7fffffffdc40) at perf.c:448
  #9  0x00000000004c0b5d in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:560
  (gdb)

After:

  root@number:~# perf trace -a --errno-summary sleep 1
  <SNIP>
     pw-data-loop (2685), 1410 events, 16.0%

     syscall            calls  errors  total       min       avg       max       stddev
                                       (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
     --------------- --------  ------ -------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
     epoll_wait           188      0   983.428     0.000     5.231    15.595      8.68%
     ioctl                 94      0     0.811     0.004     0.009     0.016      2.82%
     read                 188      0     0.322     0.001     0.002     0.006      5.15%
     write                141      0     0.280     0.001     0.002     0.018      8.39%
     timerfd_settime       94      0     0.138     0.001     0.001     0.007      6.47%

   gnome-control-c (179406), 1848 events, 20.9%

     syscall            calls  errors  total       min       avg       max       stddev
                                       (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
     --------------- --------  ------ -------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
     poll                 222      0   959.577     0.000     4.322    21.414     11.40%
     recvmsg              150      0     0.539     0.001     0.004     0.013      5.12%
     write                300      0     0.442     0.001     0.001     0.007      3.29%
     read                 150      0     0.183     0.001     0.001     0.009      5.53%
     getpid               102      0     0.101     0.000     0.001     0.008      7.82%

  root@number:~#

Fixes: 54373b5 ("perf env: Introduce perf_env__arch_strerrno()")
Reported-by: Veronika Molnarova <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Veronika Molnarova <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Petlan <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Michael Petlan <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z0XffUgNSv_9OjOi@x1
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
When virtnet_close is followed by virtnet_open, some TX completions can
possibly remain unconsumed, until they are finally processed during the
first NAPI poll after the netdev_tx_reset_queue(), resulting in a crash
[1]. Commit b96ed2c ("virtio_net: move netdev_tx_reset_queue() call
before RX napi enable") was not sufficient to eliminate all BQL crash
cases for virtio-net.

This issue can be reproduced with the latest net-next master by running:
`while :; do ip l set DEV down; ip l set DEV up; done` under heavy network
TX load from inside the machine.

netdev_tx_reset_queue() can actually be dropped from virtnet_open path;
the device is not stopped in any case. For BQL core part, it's just like
traffic nearly ceases to exist for some period. For stall detector added
to BQL, even if virtnet_close could somehow lead to some TX completions
delayed for long, followed by virtnet_open, we can just take it as stall
as mentioned in commit 6025b91 ("net: dqs: add NIC stall detector
based on BQL"). Note also that users can still reset stall_max via sysfs.

So, drop netdev_tx_reset_queue() from virtnet_enable_queue_pair(). This
eliminates the BQL crashes. As a result, netdev_tx_reset_queue() is now
explicitly required in freeze/restore path. This patch adds it to
immediately after free_unused_bufs(), following the rule of thumb:
netdev_tx_reset_queue() should follow any SKB freeing not followed by
netdev_tx_completed_queue(). This seems the most consistent and
streamlined approach, and now netdev_tx_reset_queue() runs whenever
free_unused_bufs() is done.

[1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c:99!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1598 Comm: ip Tainted: G    N 6.12.0net-next_main+ #2
Tainted: [N]=TEST
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), \
BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
Code: b7 c2 49 89 e9 44 89 da 89 c6 4c 89 d7 e8 ed 17 47 00 58 65 ff 0d
4d 27 90 7e 0f 85 fd fe ff ff e8 ea 53 8d ff e9 f3 fe ff ff <0f> 0b 01
d2 44 89 d1 29 d1 ba 00 00 00 00 0f 48 ca e9 28 ff ff ff
RSP: 0018:ffffc900002b0d08 EFLAGS: 00010297
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888102398c80 RCX: 0000000080190009
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000006a RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff888102398c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000000000ca R11: 0000000000015681 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffffc900002b0d68 R14: ffff88811115e000 R15: ffff8881107aca40
FS:  00007f41ded69500(0000) GS:ffff888667dc0000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000556ccc2dc1a0 CR3: 0000000104fd8003 CR4: 0000000000772ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 ? die+0x32/0x80
 ? do_trap+0xd9/0x100
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? do_error_trap+0x6d/0xb0
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x4c/0x60
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 __free_old_xmit+0xff/0x170 [virtio_net]
 free_old_xmit+0x54/0xc0 [virtio_net]
 virtnet_poll+0xf4/0xe30 [virtio_net]
 ? __update_load_avg_cfs_rq+0x264/0x2d0
 ? update_curr+0x35/0x260
 ? reweight_entity+0x1be/0x260
 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x28/0x1c0
 net_rx_action+0x329/0x420
 ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x35/0x90
 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1d/0x80
 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20
 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30
 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20
 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30
 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x1a0
 handle_softirqs+0x138/0x3e0
 do_softirq.part.0+0x89/0xc0
 </IRQ>
 <TASK>
 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa7/0xb0
 virtnet_open+0xc8/0x310 [virtio_net]
 __dev_open+0xfa/0x1b0
 __dev_change_flags+0x1de/0x250
 dev_change_flags+0x22/0x60
 do_setlink.isra.0+0x2df/0x10b0
 ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x34f/0x3f0
 ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
 ? netlink_unicast+0x23e/0x390
 ? netlink_sendmsg+0x21e/0x490
 ? ____sys_sendmsg+0x31b/0x350
 ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x67/0xf0
 ? cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x75/0x110
 ? __nla_validate_parse+0x5f/0xee0
 ? __pfx___probestub_irq_enable+0x3/0x10
 ? __create_object+0x5e/0x90
 ? security_capable+0x3b/0x70
 rtnl_newlink+0x784/0xaf0
 ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x67/0xf0
 ? cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x75/0x110
 ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x24/0x6d0
 ? __pfx_rtnl_newlink+0x10/0x10
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x34f/0x3f0
 ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x180
 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
 netlink_unicast+0x23e/0x390
 netlink_sendmsg+0x21e/0x490
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x31b/0x350
 ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x6d/0xa0
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x86/0xd0
 ? __pte_offset_map+0x17/0x160
 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0
 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x147/0x610
 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0
 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0
 ? _raw_spin_trylock+0x13/0x60
 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1d/0x80
 __sys_sendmsg+0x66/0xc0
 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x180
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f41defe5b34
Code: 15 e1 12 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bf 0f 1f 44 00 00
f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 35 95 0f 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00
f0 ff ff 77 4c c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 89 55
RSP: 002b:00007ffe5336ecc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f41defe5b34
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe5336ed30 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007ffe5336eda0 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 00007ffe5336f6f9 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000067452259 R14: 0000556ccc28b040 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>
[...]

Fixes: c8bd1f7 ("virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits")
Cc: <[email protected]> # v6.11+
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]>
[ pabeni: trimmed possibly troublesome separator ]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
…nts'

Koichiro Den says:

====================
virtio_net: correct netdev_tx_reset_queue() invocation points

When virtnet_close is followed by virtnet_open, some TX completions can
possibly remain unconsumed, until they are finally processed during the
first NAPI poll after the netdev_tx_reset_queue(), resulting in a crash
[1]. Commit b96ed2c ("virtio_net: move netdev_tx_reset_queue() call
before RX napi enable") was not sufficient to eliminate all BQL crash
scenarios for virtio-net.

This issue can be reproduced with the latest net-next master by running:
`while :; do ip l set DEV down; ip l set DEV up; done` under heavy network
TX load from inside the machine.

This patch series resolves the issue and also addresses similar existing
problems:

(a). Drop netdev_tx_reset_queue() from open/close path. This eliminates the
     BQL crashes due to the problematic open/close path.

(b). As a result of (a), netdev_tx_reset_queue() is now explicitly required
     in freeze/restore path. Add netdev_tx_reset_queue() immediately after
     free_unused_bufs() invocation.

(c). Fix missing resetting in virtnet_tx_resize().
     virtnet_tx_resize() has lacked proper resetting since commit
     c8bd1f7 ("virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits").

(d). Fix missing resetting in the XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL path.
     Similar to (c), this path lacked proper resetting. Call
     netdev_tx_reset_queue() when virtqueue_reset() has actually recycled
     unused buffers.

This patch series consists of six commits:
  [1/6]: Resolves (a) and (b).                      # also -stable 6.11.y
  [2/6]: Minor fix to make [4/6] streamlined.
  [3/6]: Prerequisite for (c).                      # also -stable 6.11.y
  [4/6]: Resolves (c) (incl. Prerequisite for (d))  # also -stable 6.11.y
  [5/6]: Preresuisite for (d).
  [6/6]: Resolves (d).

Changes for v4:
  - move netdev_tx_reset_queue() out of free_unused_bufs()
  - submit to net, not net-next
Changes for v3:
  - replace 'flushed' argument with 'recycle_done'
Changes for v2:
  - add tx queue resetting for (b) to (d) above

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

[1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c:99!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1598 Comm: ip Tainted: G    N 6.12.0net-next_main+ #2
Tainted: [N]=TEST
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), \
BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
Code: b7 c2 49 89 e9 44 89 da 89 c6 4c 89 d7 e8 ed 17 47 00 58 65 ff 0d
4d 27 90 7e 0f 85 fd fe ff ff e8 ea 53 8d ff e9 f3 fe ff ff <0f> 0b 01
d2 44 89 d1 29 d1 ba 00 00 00 00 0f 48 ca e9 28 ff ff ff
RSP: 0018:ffffc900002b0d08 EFLAGS: 00010297
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888102398c80 RCX: 0000000080190009
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000006a RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff888102398c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000000000ca R11: 0000000000015681 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffffc900002b0d68 R14: ffff88811115e000 R15: ffff8881107aca40
FS:  00007f41ded69500(0000) GS:ffff888667dc0000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000556ccc2dc1a0 CR3: 0000000104fd8003 CR4: 0000000000772ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 ? die+0x32/0x80
 ? do_trap+0xd9/0x100
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? do_error_trap+0x6d/0xb0
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x4c/0x60
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290
 __free_old_xmit+0xff/0x170 [virtio_net]
 free_old_xmit+0x54/0xc0 [virtio_net]
 virtnet_poll+0xf4/0xe30 [virtio_net]
 ? __update_load_avg_cfs_rq+0x264/0x2d0
 ? update_curr+0x35/0x260
 ? reweight_entity+0x1be/0x260
 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x28/0x1c0
 net_rx_action+0x329/0x420
 ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x35/0x90
 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1d/0x80
 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20
 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30
 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20
 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30
 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x1a0
 handle_softirqs+0x138/0x3e0
 do_softirq.part.0+0x89/0xc0
 </IRQ>
 <TASK>
 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa7/0xb0
 virtnet_open+0xc8/0x310 [virtio_net]
 __dev_open+0xfa/0x1b0
 __dev_change_flags+0x1de/0x250
 dev_change_flags+0x22/0x60
 do_setlink.isra.0+0x2df/0x10b0
 ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x34f/0x3f0
 ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
 ? netlink_unicast+0x23e/0x390
 ? netlink_sendmsg+0x21e/0x490
 ? ____sys_sendmsg+0x31b/0x350
 ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x67/0xf0
 ? cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x75/0x110
 ? __nla_validate_parse+0x5f/0xee0
 ? __pfx___probestub_irq_enable+0x3/0x10
 ? __create_object+0x5e/0x90
 ? security_capable+0x3b/0x7�[I0
 rtnl_newlink+0x784/0xaf0
 ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x67/0xf0
 ? cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x75/0x110
 ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x24/0x6d0
 ? __pfx_rtnl_newlink+0x10/0x10
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x34f/0x3f0
 ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x180
 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
 netlink_unicast+0x23e/0x390
 netlink_sendmsg+0x21e/0x490
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x31b/0x350
 ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x6d/0xa0
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x86/0xd0
 ? __pte_offset_map+0x17/0x160
 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0
 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x147/0x610
 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0
 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0
 ? _raw_spin_trylock+0x13/0x60
 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1d/0x80
 __sys_sendmsg+0x66/0xc0
 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x180
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f41defe5b34
Code: 15 e1 12 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bf 0f 1f 44 00 00
f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 35 95 0f 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00
f0 ff ff 77 4c c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 89 55
RSP: 002b:00007ffe5336ecc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f41defe5b34
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe5336ed30 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007ffe5336eda0 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 00007ffe5336f6f9 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000067452259 R14: 0000556ccc28b040 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>
[...]
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
…ux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.13, part #2

 - Fix confusion with implicitly-shifted MDCR_EL2 masks breaking
   SPE/TRBE initialization

 - Align nested page table walker with the intended memory attribute
   combining rules of the architecture

 - Prevent userspace from constraining the advertised ASID width,
   avoiding horrors of guest TLBIs not matching the intended context in
   hardware

 - Don't leak references on LPIs when insertion into the translation
   cache fails
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
The vmemmap's, which is used for RV64 with SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, page
tables are populated using pmd (page middle directory) hugetables.
However, the pmd allocation is not using the generic mechanism used by
the VMA code (e.g. pmd_alloc()), or the RISC-V specific
create_pgd_mapping()/alloc_pmd_late(). Instead, the vmemmap page table
code allocates a page, and calls vmemmap_set_pmd(). This results in
that the pmd ctor is *not* called, nor would it make sense to do so.

Now, when tearing down a vmemmap page table pmd, the cleanup code
would unconditionally, and incorrectly call the pmd dtor, which
results in a crash (best case).

This issue was found when running the HMM selftests:

  | tools/testing/selftests/mm# ./test_hmm.sh smoke
  | ... # when unloading the test_hmm.ko module
  | page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10915b
  | flags: 0x1000000000000000(node=0|zone=1)
  | raw: 1000000000000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
  | raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  | page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(ptdesc->pmd_huge_pte)
  | ------------[ cut here ]------------
  | kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:3080!
  | Kernel BUG [#1]
  | Modules linked in: test_hmm(-) sch_fq_codel fuse drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks backlight dm_mod
  | CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 514 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G        W          6.12.0-00982-gf2a4f1682d07 #2
  | Tainted: [W]=WARN
  | Hardware name: riscv-virtio qemu/qemu, BIOS 2024.10 10/01/2024
  | epc : remove_pgd_mapping+0xbec/0x1070
  |  ra : remove_pgd_mapping+0xbec/0x1070
  | epc : ffffffff80010a68 ra : ffffffff80010a68 sp : ff20000000a73940
  |  gp : ffffffff827b2d88 tp : ff6000008785da40 t0 : ffffffff80fbce04
  |  t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 706d756420656761 s0 : ff20000000a73a50
  |  s1 : ff6000008915cff8 a0 : 0000000000000039 a1 : 0000000000000008
  |  a2 : ff600003fff0de20 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000
  |  a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : c0000000ffffefff a7 : ffffffff824469b8
  |  s2 : ff1c0000022456c0 s3 : ff1ffffffdbfffff s4 : ff6000008915c000
  |  s5 : ff6000008915c000 s6 : ff6000008915c000 s7 : ff1ffffffdc00000
  |  s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : ff1ffffffdc00000 s10: ffffffff819a31f0
  |  s11: ffffffffffffffff t3 : ffffffff8000c950 t4 : ff60000080244f00
  |  t5 : ff60000080244000 t6 : ff20000000a73708
  | status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff80010a68 cause: 0000000000000003
  | [<ffffffff80010a68>] remove_pgd_mapping+0xbec/0x1070
  | [<ffffffff80fd238e>] vmemmap_free+0x14/0x1e
  | [<ffffffff8032e698>] section_deactivate+0x220/0x452
  | [<ffffffff8032ef7e>] sparse_remove_section+0x4a/0x58
  | [<ffffffff802f8700>] __remove_pages+0x7e/0xba
  | [<ffffffff803760d8>] memunmap_pages+0x2bc/0x3fe
  | [<ffffffff02a3ca28>] dmirror_device_remove_chunks+0x2ea/0x518 [test_hmm]
  | [<ffffffff02a3e026>] hmm_dmirror_exit+0x3e/0x1018 [test_hmm]
  | [<ffffffff80102c14>] __riscv_sys_delete_module+0x15a/0x2a6
  | [<ffffffff80fd020c>] do_trap_ecall_u+0x1f2/0x266
  | [<ffffffff80fde0a2>] _new_vmalloc_restore_context_a0+0xc6/0xd2
  | Code: bf51 7597 0184 8593 76a5 854a 4097 0029 80e7 2c00 (9002) 7597
  | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
  | Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt

Add a check to avoid calling the pmd dtor, if the calling context is
vmemmap_free().

Fixes: c75a74f ("riscv: mm: Add memory hotplugging support")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
This reworks hci_cb_list to not use mutex hci_cb_list_lock to avoid bugs
like the bellow:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:585
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 5070, name: kworker/u9:2
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
4 locks held by kworker/u9:2/5070:
 #0: ffff888015be3948 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
 #0: ffff888015be3948 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8e0/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
 #1: ffffc90003b6fd00 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3230 [inline]
 #1: ffffc90003b6fd00 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x91b/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
 #2: ffff8880665d0078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0xcf/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6914
 #3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
 #3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
 #3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0xdb/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6915
CPU: 0 PID: 5070 Comm: kworker/u9:2 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08073-g480e035fc4c7 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 __might_resched+0x5d4/0x780 kernel/sched/core.c:10187
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0xc1/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 hci_connect_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:2004 [inline]
 hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0x3d9/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6939
 hci_event_func net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7514 [inline]
 hci_event_packet+0xa53/0x1540 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7569
 hci_rx_work+0x3e8/0xca0 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4171
 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
 process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
 </TASK>

Reported-by: [email protected]
Tested-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2fb0835e0c9cefc34614
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
This fixes the circular locking dependency warning below, by
releasing the socket lock before enterning iso_listen_bis, to
avoid any potential deadlock with hdev lock.

[   75.307983] ======================================================
[   75.307984] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   75.307985] 6.12.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted
[   75.307987] ------------------------------------------------------
[   75.307987] kworker/u81:2/2623 is trying to acquire lock:
[   75.307988] ffff8fde1769da58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO)
               at: iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth]
[   75.308021]
               but task is already holding lock:
[   75.308022] ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock)
               at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth]
[   75.308053]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[   75.308054]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   75.308055]
               -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[   75.308057]        __mutex_lock+0xad/0xc50
[   75.308061]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[   75.308063]        iso_sock_listen+0x143/0x5c0 [bluetooth]
[   75.308085]        __sys_listen_socket+0x49/0x60
[   75.308088]        __x64_sys_listen+0x4c/0x90
[   75.308090]        x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0
[   75.308092]        do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150
[   75.308095]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[   75.308098]
               -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[   75.308100]        __lock_acquire+0x155e/0x25f0
[   75.308103]        lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300
[   75.308105]        lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x90
[   75.308107]        iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth]
[   75.308128]        hci_connect_cfm+0x6c/0x190 [bluetooth]
[   75.308155]        hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x27b/0x2f0 [bluetooth]
[   75.308180]        hci_le_meta_evt+0xe7/0x200 [bluetooth]
[   75.308206]        hci_event_packet+0x21f/0x5c0 [bluetooth]
[   75.308230]        hci_rx_work+0x3ae/0xb10 [bluetooth]
[   75.308254]        process_one_work+0x212/0x740
[   75.308256]        worker_thread+0x1bd/0x3a0
[   75.308258]        kthread+0xe4/0x120
[   75.308259]        ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70
[   75.308261]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[   75.308263]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[   75.308264]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[   75.308264]        CPU0                CPU1
[   75.308265]        ----                ----
[   75.308265]   lock(&hdev->lock);
[   75.308267]                            lock(sk_lock-
                                                AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO);
[   75.308268]                            lock(&hdev->lock);
[   75.308269]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO);
[   75.308270]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[   75.308271] 4 locks held by kworker/u81:2/2623:
[   75.308272]  #0: ffff8fdd66e52148 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0},
                at: process_one_work+0x443/0x740
[   75.308276]  #1: ffffafb488b7fe48 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)),
                at: process_one_work+0x1ce/0x740
[   75.308280]  #2: ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}
                at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth]
[   75.308304]  #3: ffffffffb6ba4900 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2},
                at: hci_connect_cfm+0x29/0x190 [bluetooth]

Fixes: 02171da ("Bluetooth: ISO: Add hcon for listening bis sk")
Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
This fixes the circular locking dependency warning below, by reworking
iso_sock_recvmsg, to ensure that the socket lock is always released
before calling a function that locks hdev.

[  561.670344] ======================================================
[  561.670346] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  561.670349] 6.12.0-rc6+ #26 Not tainted
[  561.670351] ------------------------------------------------------
[  561.670353] iso-tester/3289 is trying to acquire lock:
[  561.670355] ffff88811f600078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
               at: iso_conn_big_sync+0x73/0x260 [bluetooth]
[  561.670405]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  561.670407] ffff88815af58258 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.}-{0:0},
               at: iso_sock_recvmsg+0xbf/0x500 [bluetooth]
[  561.670450]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  561.670452]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  561.670453]
               -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[  561.670458]        lock_acquire+0x7c/0xc0
[  561.670463]        lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0
[  561.670467]        bt_accept_dequeue+0x1a5/0x4d0 [bluetooth]
[  561.670510]        iso_sock_accept+0x271/0x830 [bluetooth]
[  561.670547]        do_accept+0x3dd/0x610
[  561.670550]        __sys_accept4+0xd8/0x170
[  561.670553]        __x64_sys_accept+0x74/0xc0
[  561.670556]        x64_sys_call+0x17d6/0x25f0
[  561.670559]        do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150
[  561.670563]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  561.670567]
               -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[  561.670571]        lock_acquire+0x7c/0xc0
[  561.670574]        lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0
[  561.670577]        iso_sock_listen+0x2de/0xf30 [bluetooth]
[  561.670617]        __sys_listen_socket+0xef/0x130
[  561.670620]        __x64_sys_listen+0xe1/0x190
[  561.670623]        x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0
[  561.670626]        do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150
[  561.670629]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  561.670632]
               -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  561.670636]        __lock_acquire+0x32ad/0x6ab0
[  561.670639]        lock_acquire.part.0+0x118/0x360
[  561.670642]        lock_acquire+0x7c/0xc0
[  561.670644]        __mutex_lock+0x18d/0x12f0
[  561.670647]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  561.670651]        iso_conn_big_sync+0x73/0x260 [bluetooth]
[  561.670687]        iso_sock_recvmsg+0x3e9/0x500 [bluetooth]
[  561.670722]        sock_recvmsg+0x1d5/0x240
[  561.670725]        sock_read_iter+0x27d/0x470
[  561.670727]        vfs_read+0x9a0/0xd30
[  561.670731]        ksys_read+0x1a8/0x250
[  561.670733]        __x64_sys_read+0x72/0xc0
[  561.670736]        x64_sys_call+0x1b12/0x25f0
[  561.670738]        do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150
[  561.670741]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  561.670744]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  561.670745] Chain exists of:
&hdev->lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH

[  561.670751]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  561.670753]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  561.670754]        ----                    ----
[  561.670756]   lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH);
[  561.670758]                                lock(sk_lock
                                              AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO);
[  561.670761]                                lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH);
[  561.670764]   lock(&hdev->lock);
[  561.670767]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

Fixes: 07a9342 ("Bluetooth: ISO: Send BIG Create Sync via hci_sync")
Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
Aishwarya reports that warnings are sometimes seen when running the
ftrace kselftests, e.g.

| WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 2066 at arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:141 arch_stack_walk+0x4a0/0x4c0
| Modules linked in:
| CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2066 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2 #2
| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
| pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
| pc : arch_stack_walk+0x4a0/0x4c0
| lr : arch_stack_walk+0x248/0x4c0
| sp : ffff800083643d20
| x29: ffff800083643dd0 x28: ffff00007b891400 x27: ffff00007b891928
| x26: 0000000000000001 x25: 00000000000000c0 x24: ffff800082f39d80
| x23: ffff80008003ee8c x22: ffff80008004baa8 x21: ffff8000800533e0
| x20: ffff800083643e10 x19: ffff80008003eec8 x18: 0000000000000000
| x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff800083640000 x15: 0000000000000000
| x14: 02a37a802bbb8a92 x13: 00000000000001a9 x12: 0000000000000001
| x11: ffff800082ffad60 x10: ffff800083643d20 x9 : ffff80008003eed0
| x8 : ffff80008004baa8 x7 : ffff800086f2be80 x6 : ffff0000057cf000
| x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff800086f2b690
| x2 : ffff80008004baa8 x1 : ffff80008004baa8 x0 : ffff80008004baa8
| Call trace:
|  arch_stack_walk+0x4a0/0x4c0 (P)
|  arch_stack_walk+0x248/0x4c0 (L)
|  profile_pc+0x44/0x80
|  profile_tick+0x50/0x80 (F)
|  tick_nohz_handler+0xcc/0x160 (F)
|  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x2ac/0x340 (F)
|  hrtimer_interrupt+0xf4/0x268 (F)
|  arch_timer_handler_virt+0x34/0x60 (F)
|  handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x88/0x220 (F)
|  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x34/0x60 (F)
|  gic_handle_irq+0x54/0x140 (F)
|  call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x58 (F)
|  do_interrupt_handler+0x88/0x98
|  el1_interrupt+0x34/0x68 (F)
|  el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28
|  el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70
|  queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x78/0x460 (P)

The warning in question is:

  WARN_ON_ONCE(state->common.pc == orig_pc))

... in kunwind_recover_return_address(), which is triggered when
return_to_handler() is encountered in the trace, but
ftrace_graph_ret_addr() cannot find a corresponding original return
address on the fgraph return stack.

This happens because the stacktrace code encounters an exception
boundary where the LR was not live at the time of the exception, but the
LR happens to contain return_to_handler(); either because the task
recently returned there, or due to unfortunate usage of the LR at a
scratch register. In such cases attempts to recover the return address
via ftrace_graph_ret_addr() may fail, triggering the WARN_ON_ONCE()
above and aborting the unwind (hence the stacktrace terminating after
reporting the PC at the time of the exception).

Handling unreliable LR values in these cases is likely to require some
larger rework, so for the moment avoid this problem by restoring the old
behaviour of skipping the LR at exception boundaries, which the
stacktrace code did prior to commit:

  c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries")

This commit is effectively a partial revert, keeping the structures and
logic to explicitly identify exception boundaries while still skipping
reporting of the LR. The logic to explicitly identify exception
boundaries is still useful for general robustness and as a building
block for future support for RELIABLE_STACKTRACE.

Fixes: c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Aishwarya TCV <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
The arm64 stacktrace code has a few error conditions where a
WARN_ON_ONCE() is triggered before the stacktrace is terminated and an
error is returned to the caller. The conditions shouldn't be triggered
when unwinding the current task, but it is possible to trigger these
when unwinding another task which is not blocked, as the stack of that
task is concurrently modified. Kent reports that these warnings can be
triggered while running filesystem tests on bcachefs, which calls the
stacktrace code directly.

To produce a meaningful stacktrace of another task, the task in question
should be blocked, but the stacktrace code is expected to be robust to
cases where it is not blocked. Note that this is purely about not
unuduly scaring the user and/or crashing the kernel; stacktraces in such
cases are meaningless and may leak kernel secrets from the stack of the
task being unwound.

Ideally we'd pin the task in a blocked state during the unwind, as we do
for /proc/${PID}/wchan since commit:

  42a20f8 ("sched: Add wrapper for get_wchan() to keep task blocked")

... but a bunch of places don't do that, notably /proc/${PID}/stack,
where we don't pin the task in a blocked state, but do restrict the
output to privileged users since commit:

  f8a00ce ("proc: restrict kernel stack dumps to root")

... and so it's possible to trigger these warnings accidentally, e.g. by
reading /proc/*/stack (as root):

| for n in $(seq 1 10); do
|     while true; do cat /proc/*/stack > /dev/null 2>&1; done &
| done
| ------------[ cut here ]------------
| WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 166 at arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:207 arch_stack_walk+0x1c8/0x370
| Modules linked in:
| CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 166 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00003-g3dafa7a7925d #2
| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
| pstate: 81400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
| pc : arch_stack_walk+0x1c8/0x370
| lr : arch_stack_walk+0x1b0/0x370
| sp : ffff800080773890
| x29: ffff800080773930 x28: fff0000005c44500 x27: fff00000058fa038
| x26: 000000007ffff000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
| x23: ffffa35a8d9600ec x22: 0000000000000000 x21: fff00000043a33c0
| x20: ffff800080773970 x19: ffffa35a8d960168 x18: 0000000000000000
| x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
| x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
| x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
| x8 : ffff8000807738e0 x7 : ffff8000806e3800 x6 : ffff8000806e3818
| x5 : ffff800080773920 x4 : ffff8000806e4000 x3 : ffff8000807738e0
| x2 : 0000000000000018 x1 : ffff8000806e3800 x0 : 0000000000000000
| Call trace:
|  arch_stack_walk+0x1c8/0x370 (P)
|  stack_trace_save_tsk+0x8c/0x108
|  proc_pid_stack+0xb0/0x134
|  proc_single_show+0x60/0x120
|  seq_read_iter+0x104/0x438
|  seq_read+0xf8/0x140
|  vfs_read+0xc4/0x31c
|  ksys_read+0x70/0x108
|  __arm64_sys_read+0x1c/0x28
|  invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104
|  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
|  do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
|  el0_svc+0x30/0xcc
|  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
|  el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
| ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fix this by only warning when unwinding the current task. When unwinding
another task the error conditions will be handled by returning an error
without producing a warning.

The two warnings in kunwind_next_frame_record_meta() were added recently
as part of commit:

  c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries")

The warning when recovering the fgraph return address has changed form
many times, but was originally introduced back in commit:

  9f41631 ("arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracing")

Fixes: c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries")
Fixes: 9f41631 ("arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracing")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
The current implementation removes cache tags after disabling ATS,
leading to potential memory leaks and kernel crashes. Specifically,
CACHE_TAG_DEVTLB type cache tags may still remain in the list even
after the domain is freed, causing a use-after-free condition.

This issue really shows up when multiple VFs from different PFs
passed through to a single user-space process via vfio-pci. In such
cases, the kernel may crash with kernel messages like:

 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014
 PGD 19036a067 P4D 1940a3067 PUD 136c9b067 PMD 0
 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
 CPU: 74 UID: 0 PID: 3183 Comm: testCli Not tainted 6.11.9 #2
 RIP: 0010:cache_tag_flush_range+0x9b/0x250
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? __die+0x1f/0x60
  ? page_fault_oops+0x163/0x590
  ? exc_page_fault+0x72/0x190
  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
  ? cache_tag_flush_range+0x9b/0x250
  ? cache_tag_flush_range+0x5d/0x250
  intel_iommu_tlb_sync+0x29/0x40
  intel_iommu_unmap_pages+0xfe/0x160
  __iommu_unmap+0xd8/0x1a0
  vfio_unmap_unpin+0x182/0x340 [vfio_iommu_type1]
  vfio_remove_dma+0x2a/0xb0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
  vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xafa/0x18e0 [vfio_iommu_type1]

Move cache_tag_unassign_domain() before iommu_disable_pci_caps() to fix
it.

Fixes: 3b1d9e2 ("iommu/vt-d: Add cache tag assignment interface")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
ojeda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
…s_lock

For storing a value to a queue attribute, the queue_attr_store function
first freezes the queue (->q_usage_counter(io)) and then acquire
->sysfs_lock. This seems not correct as the usual ordering should be to
acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue. This incorrect ordering
causes the following lockdep splat which we are able to reproduce always
simply by accessing /sys/kernel/debug file using ls command:

[   57.597146] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   57.597154] 6.12.0-10553-gb86545e02e8c #20 Tainted: G        W
[   57.597162] ------------------------------------------------------
[   57.597168] ls/4605 is trying to acquire lock:
[   57.597176] c00000003eb56710 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: __might_fault+0x58/0xc0
[   57.597200]
               but task is already holding lock:
[   57.597207] c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4
[   57.597226]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[   57.597233]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   57.597241]
               -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}:
[   57.597255]        down_write+0x6c/0x18c
[   57.597264]        start_creating+0xb4/0x24c
[   57.597274]        debugfs_create_dir+0x2c/0x1e8
[   57.597283]        blk_register_queue+0xec/0x294
[   57.597292]        add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548
[   57.597302]        brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338
[   57.597309]        brd_init+0x100/0x178
[   57.597317]        do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4
[   57.597326]        kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0
[   57.597334]        kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc
[   57.597342]        ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
[   57.597350]
               -> #4 (&q->debugfs_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
[   57.597362]        __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0
[   57.597370]        blk_register_queue+0xd4/0x294
[   57.597379]        add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548
[   57.597388]        brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338
[   57.597395]        brd_init+0x100/0x178
[   57.597402]        do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4
[   57.597410]        kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0
[   57.597418]        kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc
[   57.597426]        ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
[   57.597434]
               -> #3 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
[   57.597446]        __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0
[   57.597454]        queue_attr_store+0x9c/0x110
[   57.597462]        sysfs_kf_write+0x70/0xb0
[   57.597471]        kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b0/0x2ac
[   57.597480]        vfs_write+0x3dc/0x6e8
[   57.597488]        ksys_write+0x84/0x140
[   57.597495]        system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[   57.597504]        system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[   57.597516]
               -> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#21){++++}-{0:0}:
[   57.597530]        __submit_bio+0x5ec/0x828
[   57.597538]        submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x1e4/0x4f0
[   57.597547]        iomap_readahead+0x2a0/0x448
[   57.597556]        xfs_vm_readahead+0x28/0x3c
[   57.597564]        read_pages+0x88/0x41c
[   57.597571]        page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ac/0x2d8
[   57.597580]        filemap_get_pages+0x188/0x984
[   57.597588]        filemap_read+0x13c/0x4bc
[   57.597596]        xfs_file_buffered_read+0x88/0x17c
[   57.597605]        xfs_file_read_iter+0xac/0x158
[   57.597614]        vfs_read+0x2d4/0x3b4
[   57.597622]        ksys_read+0x84/0x144
[   57.597629]        system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[   57.597637]        system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[   57.597647]
               -> #1 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}:
[   57.597661]        down_read+0x6c/0x220
[   57.597669]        filemap_fault+0x870/0x100c
[   57.597677]        xfs_filemap_fault+0xc4/0x18c
[   57.597684]        __do_fault+0x64/0x164
[   57.597693]        __handle_mm_fault+0x1274/0x1dac
[   57.597702]        handle_mm_fault+0x248/0x484
[   57.597711]        ___do_page_fault+0x428/0xc0c
[   57.597719]        hash__do_page_fault+0x30/0x68
[   57.597727]        do_hash_fault+0x90/0x35c
[   57.597736]        data_access_common_virt+0x210/0x220
[   57.597745]        _copy_from_user+0xf8/0x19c
[   57.597754]        sel_write_load+0x178/0xd54
[   57.597762]        vfs_write+0x108/0x6e8
[   57.597769]        ksys_write+0x84/0x140
[   57.597777]        system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[   57.597785]        system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[   57.597794]
               -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
[   57.597806]        __lock_acquire+0x17cc/0x2330
[   57.597814]        lock_acquire+0x138/0x400
[   57.597822]        __might_fault+0x7c/0xc0
[   57.597830]        filldir64+0xe8/0x390
[   57.597839]        dcache_readdir+0x80/0x2d4
[   57.597846]        iterate_dir+0xd8/0x1d4
[   57.597855]        sys_getdents64+0x88/0x2d4
[   57.597864]        system_call_exception+0x130/0x360
[   57.597872]        system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
[   57.597881]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[   57.597888] Chain exists of:
                 &mm->mmap_lock --> &q->debugfs_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3

[   57.597905]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[   57.597911]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   57.597917]        ----                    ----
[   57.597922]   rlock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3);
[   57.597932]                                lock(&q->debugfs_mutex);
[   57.597940]                                lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3);
[   57.597950]   rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);
[   57.597958]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[   57.597965] 2 locks held by ls/4605:
[   57.597971]  #0: c0000000137c12f8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: fdget_pos+0xcc/0x154
[   57.597989]  #1: c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4

Prevent the above lockdep warning by acquiring ->sysfs_lock before
freezing the queue while storing a queue attribute in queue_attr_store
function. Later, we also found[1] another function __blk_mq_update_nr_
hw_queues where we first freeze queue and then acquire the ->sysfs_lock.
So we've also updated lock ordering in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
function and ensured that in all code paths we follow the correct lock
ordering i.e. acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAFj5m9Ke8+EHKQBs_Nk6hqd=LGXtk4mUxZUN5==ZcCjnZSBwHw@mail.gmail.com/

Reported-by: [email protected]
Fixes: af28141 ("block: freeze the queue in queue_attr_store")
Tested-by: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
metaspace pushed a commit to metaspace/linux that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 953e549 ]

Lockdep gives a false positive splat as it can't distinguish the lock
which is taken by different IRQ descriptors from different IRQ chips
that are organized in a way of a hierarchy:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.12.0-rc5-next-20241101-00148-g9fabf8160b53 Rust-for-Linux#562 Tainted: G        W
   ------------------------------------------------------
   modprobe/141 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffff899446947868 (intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: regmap_update_bits_base+0x33/0x90

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffff899446947c68 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x682/0x790

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   -> Rust-for-Linux#3 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
   -> Rust-for-Linux#2 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
   -> #1 (ipclock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
   -> #0 (intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:

   Chain exists of:
     intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock --> &desc->request_mutex --> &d->lock

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(&d->lock);
                                  lock(&desc->request_mutex);
                                  lock(&d->lock);
     lock(intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   3 locks held by modprobe/141:
    #0: ffff8994419368f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xf6/0x250
    #1: ffff89944690b250 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x1a2/0x790
    Rust-for-Linux#2: ffff899446947c68 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x682/0x790

Set a lockdep class when we map the IRQ so that it doesn't warn about
a lockdep bug that doesn't exist.

Fixes: 4af8be6 ("regmap: Convert regmap_irq to use irq_domain")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
metaspace pushed a commit to metaspace/linux that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 06dbbb4 ]

copy_from_kernel_nofault() can be called when doing read of /proc/kcore.
/proc/kcore can have some unmapped kfence objects which when read via
copy_from_kernel_nofault() can cause page faults. Since *_nofault()
functions define their own fixup table for handling fault, use that
instead of asking kfence to handle such faults.

Hence we search the exception tables for the nip which generated the
fault. If there is an entry then we let the fixup table handler handle the
page fault by returning an error from within ___do_page_fault().

This can be easily triggered if someone tries to do dd from /proc/kcore.
eg. dd if=/proc/kcore of=/dev/null bs=1M

Some example false negatives:

  ===============================
  BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0
  Invalid read at 0xc0000000fdff0000:
   copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0
   0xc00000000665f950
   read_kcore_iter+0x57c/0xa04
   proc_reg_read_iter+0xe4/0x16c
   vfs_read+0x320/0x3ec
   ksys_read+0x90/0x154
   system_call_exception+0x120/0x310
   system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec

  BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0
  Use-after-free read at 0xc0000000fe050000 (in kfence-Rust-for-Linux#2):
   copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0
   0xc00000000665f950
   read_kcore_iter+0x57c/0xa04
   proc_reg_read_iter+0xe4/0x16c
   vfs_read+0x320/0x3ec
   ksys_read+0x90/0x154
   system_call_exception+0x120/0x310
   system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec

Fixes: 90cbac0 ("powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32")
Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Disha Goel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/a411788081d50e3b136c6270471e35aba3dfafa3.1729271995.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
metaspace pushed a commit to metaspace/linux that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit cadae3a ]

The dtl_access_lock needs to be a rw_sempahore, a sleeping lock, because
the code calls kmalloc() while holding it, which can sleep:

  # echo 1 > /proc/powerpc/vcpudispatch_stats
  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:337
  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 199, name: sh
  preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
  3 locks held by sh/199:
   #0: c00000000a0743f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x324/0x438
   #1: c0000000028c7058 (dtl_enable_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vcpudispatch_stats_write+0xd4/0x5f4
   Rust-for-Linux#2: c0000000028c70b8 (dtl_access_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: vcpudispatch_stats_write+0x220/0x5f4
  CPU: 0 PID: 199 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4 Rust-for-Linux#152
  Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER9 (raw) 0x4e1202 0xf000005 of:SLOF,HEAD hv:linux,kvm pSeries
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x148 (unreliable)
    __might_resched+0x174/0x410
    kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x340/0x3d0
    alloc_dtl_buffers+0x124/0x1ac
    vcpudispatch_stats_write+0x2a8/0x5f4
    proc_reg_write+0xf4/0x150
    vfs_write+0xfc/0x438
    ksys_write+0x88/0x148
    system_call_exception+0x1c4/0x5a0
    system_call_common+0xf4/0x258

Fixes: 06220d7 ("powerpc/pseries: Introduce rwlock to gatekeep DTLB usage")
Tested-by: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nysal Jan K.A <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
metaspace pushed a commit to metaspace/linux that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit f10a890 ]

syzbot reports deadlock issue of f2fs as below:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> Rust-for-Linux#2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline]
       sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899
       f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
       prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
       super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
       do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
       shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
       shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
       balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
       kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline]
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848
       might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
       prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493
       __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722
       alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265
       alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline]
       folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352
       filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010
       do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787
       read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline]
       f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032
       f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079
       f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
       f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785
       write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline]
       __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723
       writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779
       sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849
       f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941
       __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431
       task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228
       resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
       exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
       __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
       syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218
       do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
       f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline]
       f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
       f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174
       f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807
       evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725
       dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline]
       prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963
       super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
       do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435
       shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662
       shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline]
       balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline]
       kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(sb_internal#2);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(sb_internal#2);
  lock(&sbi->sb_lock);

Root cause is there will be potential deadlock in between
below tasks:

Thread A				Kswapd
- f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write
 - mnt_want_write_file -- down_read lock A
					- balance_pgdat
					 - __fs_reclaim_acquire  -- lock B
					  - shrink_node
					   - prune_icache_sb
					    - dispose_list
					     - f2fs_evict_inode
					      - sb_start_intwrite  -- down_read lock A
 - f2fs_do_sync_file
  - f2fs_write_inode
   - f2fs_handle_critical_error
    - f2fs_record_stop_reason
     - f2fs_commit_super
      - read_mapping_folio
       - filemap_alloc_folio_noprof
        - fs_reclaim_acquire  -- lock B

Both threads try to acquire read lock of lock A, then its upcoming write
lock grabber will trigger deadlock.

Let's always create an asynchronous task in f2fs_handle_critical_error()
rather than calling f2fs_record_stop_reason() synchronously to avoid
this potential deadlock issue.

Fixes: b62e71b ("f2fs: support errors=remount-ro|continue|panic mountoption")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daejun Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Meta issue. • toolchain Related to `rustc`, `bindgen`, `rustdoc`, LLVM, Clippy...
Development

No branches or pull requests