soong_ui has tracing built in, so that every build execution's trace can be
viewed. Just open $OUT_DIR/build.trace.gz in Chrome's chrome://tracing, or
with catapult's trace viewer. The last few traces are
stored in build.trace.#.gz (larger numbers are older). The associated logs
are stored in soong.#.log and verbose.#.log.gz.
soong_ui logs the wall time of the longest dependency chain compared to the
elapsed wall time in $OUT_DIR/soong.log. For example:
critical path took 3m10s
elapsed time 5m16s
perfect parallelism ratio 60%
critical path:
0:00 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/FAKE/sepolicy_neverallows_intermediates/policy_2.conf
0:04 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/FAKE/sepolicy_neverallows_intermediates/sepolicy_neverallows
0:13 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/ETC/plat_sepolicy.cil_intermediates/plat_sepolicy.cil
0:01 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/ETC/plat_pub_versioned.cil_intermediates/plat_pub_versioned.cil
0:02 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/ETC/vendor_sepolicy.cil_intermediates/vendor_sepolicy.cil
0:16 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy
0:00 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/ETC/plat_seapp_contexts_intermediates/plat_seapp_contexts
0:00 Install: out/target/product/generic_arm64/system/etc/selinux/plat_seapp_contexts
0:02 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/NOTICE.txt
0:00 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/NOTICE.xml.gz
0:00 build out/target/product/generic_arm64/system/etc/NOTICE.xml.gz
0:01 Installed file list: out/target/product/generic_arm64/installed-files.txt
1:00 Target system fs image: out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/PACKAGING/systemimage_intermediates/system.img
0:01 Install system fs image: out/target/product/generic_arm64/system.img
0:01 Target vbmeta image: out/target/product/generic_arm64/vbmeta.img
1:26 Package target files: out/target/product/generic_arm64/obj/PACKAGING/target_files_intermediates/aosp_arm64-target_files-6663974.zip
0:01 Package: out/target/product/generic_arm64/aosp_arm64-img-6663974.zip
0:01 Dist: /buildbot/dist_dirs/aosp-master-linux-aosp_arm64-userdebug/6663974/aosp_arm64-img-6663974.zip
If the elapsed time is much longer than the critical path then additional parallelism on the build machine will improve total build times. If there are long individual times listed in the critical path then improving build times for those steps or adjusting dependencies so that those steps can run earlier in the build graph will improve total build times.
Soong can be traced and profiled using the standard Go tools. It understands
the -cpuprofile, -trace, and -memprofile command line arguments, but we
don't currently have an easy way to enable them in the context of a full build.
In general, the slow path of reading Android.mk files isn't particularly
performance sensitive, since it doesn't need to happen on every build. It is
important for the fast-path (detecting whether it needs to regenerate the ninja
file) to be fast however. And it shouldn't hit the slow path too often -- so
don't rely on output of a $(shell) command that includes the current timestamp,
or read a file that's going to change on every build.
In most cases, we've found that the fast-path is slow because all of the
$(shell) commands need to be re-executed to determine if their output changed.
The $OUT_DIR/verbose.log.gz contains statistics from the regen check:
verbose: *kati*: regen check time: 0.754030
verbose: *kati*: glob time (regen): 0.545859 / 43840
verbose: *kati*: shell time (regen): 0.278095 / 66 (59 unique)
verbose: *kati*: 0.012 / 1 mkdir -p out/target/product/generic && echo Android/aosp_arm/generic:R/AOSP.MASTER/$(date -d @$(cat out/build_date.txt) +%m%d%H%M):eng/test-keys >out/target/product/generic/build_fingerprint.txt && grep " " out/target/product/generic/build_fingerprint.txt
verbose: *kati*: 0.010 / 1 echo 'com.android.launcher3.config.FlagOverrideSampleTest com.android.launcher3.logging.FileLogTest com.android.launcher3.model.AddWorkspaceItemsTaskTest com.android.launcher3.model.CacheDataUpdatedTaskTest com.android.launcher3.model.DbDowngradeHelperTest com.android.launcher3.model.GridBackupTableTest com.android.launcher3.model.GridSizeMigrationTaskTest com.android.launcher3.model.PackageInstallStateChangedTaskTest com.android.launcher3.popup.PopupPopulatorTest com.android.launcher3.util.GridOccupancyTest com.android.launcher3.util.IntSetTest' | tr ' ' '\n' | cat
verbose: *kati*: 0.010 / 1 cd cts/tests/framework/base/windowmanager ; find -L * -name "Components.java" -and -not -name ".*"
verbose: *kati*: 0.010 / 1 git -C test/framework/build log -s -n 1 --format="%cd" --date=format:"%Y%m%d_%H%M%S" 2>/dev/null
verbose: *kati*: 0.009 / 2 cd development/samples/ShortcutDemo/publisher ; find -L ../common/src -name "*.java" -and -not -name ".*"
verbose: *kati*: 0.009 / 2 cd development/samples/ShortcutDemo/launcher ; find -L ../common/src -name "*.java" -and -not -name ".*"
verbose: *kati*: 0.009 / 1 if ! cmp -s out/target/product/generic/obj/CONFIG/kati_packaging/dist.mk.tmp out/target/product/generic/obj/CONFIG/kati_packaging/dist.mk; then mv out/target/product/generic/obj/CONFIG/kati_packaging/dist.mk.tmp out/target/product/generic/obj/CONFIG/kati_packaging/dist.mk; else rm out/target/product/generic/obj/CONFIG/kati_packaging/dist.mk.tmp; fi
verbose: *kati*: 0.008 / 1 mkdir -p out/target/product/generic && echo R/AOSP.MASTER/$(cat out/build_number.txt):eng/test-keys >out/target/product/generic/build_thumbprint.txt && grep " " out/target/product/generic/build_thumbprint.txt
verbose: *kati*: 0.007 / 1 echo 'com.android.customization.model.clock.BaseClockManagerTest com.android.customization.model.clock.ClockManagerTest com.android.customization.model.grid.GridOptionsManagerTest com.android.customization.model.theme.ThemeManagerTest' | tr ' ' '\n' | cat
verbose: *kati*: 0.007 / 1 uname -sm
verbose: *kati*: stat time (regen): 0.361907 / 1241
In this case, the total time spent checking was 0.75 seconds, even though the
other "(regen)" numbers add up to more than that (some parts are parallelized
where possible). Often times, the biggest contributor is the $(shell) times
-- in this case, 66 calls took 0.27s. The top 10 longest shell functions are
printed.
All the longest commands in this case are all variants of a call to find, but
this is where using pure make functions instead of calling out to the shell can
make a performance impact -- many calls to check if 26 > 20 can add up. We've
added some basic math functions in math.mk to help some common use cases that
used to be rather expensive when they were used too often.
There are some optimizations in place for find commands -- if Kati can
understand the find command, the built-in find emulator can turn some of them
into glob or stat checks (falling back to calling find if one of those imply
that the output may change). Many of the common macros produce find commands
that Kati can understand, but if you're writing your own, you may want to
experiment with other options if they're showing up in this list. For example,
if this was significantly more expensive (either in runtime, or was called
often):
.../kati.go:127: *kati*: 0.015 cd libcore && (find luni/src/test/java -name "*.java" 2> /dev/null) | grep -v -f java_tests_blacklist
It may be more efficient to move the grep into make, so that the find portion
can be rewritten and cached:
$(filter-out $(file <$(LOCAL_PATH)/java_tests_blacklist),$(call all-java-files-under,luni/src/test/java))
Others can be simplified by just switching to an equivalent find command that Kati understands:
.../kati.go:127: *kati*: 0.217 find device vendor -type f -name \*.pk8 -o -name verifiedboot\* -o -name \*.x509.pem -o -name oem\*.prop | sort
By adding the implicit -a and moving the | sort to Make, this can now be
cached by Kati:
$(sort $(shell find device vendor -type -f -a -name \*.pk8 -o -name verifiedboot\* -o -name \*.x509.pem -o -name oem\*.prop))
Kati has now learned about the implicit -a, so this particular change is no
longer necessary, but the basic concept holds.
Kati prints out what triggered the slow path to be taken -- this can be a
changed file, a changed environment variable, or different output from a
$(shell) command:
out/soong/Android-aosp_arm.mk was modified, regenerating...
The state is stored in $OUT_DIR/.kati_stamp* files, and can be (partially)
read with the ckati_stamp_dump tool in prebuilts/build-tools. More debugging
is available when ckati is run with --regen_debug, but that can be a lot of
data to understand.
Kati will now dump out information about which Makefiles took the most time to
execute. This is also in the verbose.log.gz file:
verbose: *kati*: included makefiles: 73.640833 / 232810 (1066 unique)
verbose: *kati*: 18.389 / 1 out/soong/Android-aosp_arm.mk
verbose: *kati*: 13.137 / 20144 build/make/core/soong_cc_prebuilt.mk
verbose: *kati*: 11.743 / 27666 build/make/core/base_rules.mk
verbose: *kati*: 2.289 / 1 art/Android.mk
verbose: *kati*: 2.054 / 1 art/build/Android.cpplint.mk
verbose: *kati*: 1.955 / 28269 build/make/core/clear_vars.mk
verbose: *kati*: 1.795 / 283 build/make/core/package.mk
verbose: *kati*: 1.790 / 283 build/make/core/package_internal.mk
verbose: *kati*: 1.757 / 17382 build/make/core/link_type.mk
verbose: *kati*: 1.078 / 297 build/make/core/aapt2.mk
This shows that soong_cc_prebuilt.mk was included 20144 times, for a total time spent of 13.137 secounds. While Android-aosp_arm.mk was only included once, and took 18.389 seconds. In this case, Android-aosp_arm.mk is the only file that includes soong_cc_prebuilt.mk, so we can safely assume that 13 of the 18 seconds in Android-aosp_arm.mk was actually spent within soong_cc_prebuilt.mk (or something that it included, like base_rules.mk).
By default this only includes the top 10 entries, but you can ask for the stats
for any makefile to be printed with $(KATI_profile_makefile):
$(KATI_profile_makefile build/make/core/product.mk)
With these primitives, it's possible to get the timing information for small
chunks, or even single lines, of a makefile. Just move the lines you want to
measure into a new makefile, and replace their use with an include of the
new makefile. It's possible to analyze where the time is being spent by doing
a binary search using this method, but you do need to be careful not to split
conditionals across two files (the ifeq/else/endif must all be in the same file).
Add NINJA_ARGS="-d explain" to your environment before a build, this will cause
ninja to print out explanations on why actions were taken. Start reading from the
beginning, as this much data can be hard to read:
$ cd art
$ mma
$ touch runtime/jit/profile_compilation_info.h
$ NINJA_ARGS="-d explain" mma
...
ninja explain: output out/soong/.intermediates/art/tools/cpp-define-generator/cpp-define-generator-data/linux_glibc_x86_64/obj/art/tools/cpp-define-generator/main.o older than most recent input art/runtime/jit/profile_compilation_info.h (
1516683538 vs 1516685188)
ninja explain: out/soong/.intermediates/art/tools/cpp-define-generator/cpp-define-generator-data/linux_glibc_x86_64/obj/art/tools/cpp-define-generator/main.o is dirty
ninja explain: out/soong/.intermediates/art/tools/cpp-define-generator/cpp-define-generator-data/linux_glibc_x86_64/cpp-define-generator-data is dirty
ninja explain: out/soong/host/linux-x86/bin/cpp-define-generator-data is dirty
ninja explain: out/soong/.intermediates/art/tools/cpp-define-generator/cpp-define-generator-asm-support/gen/asm_support_gen.h is dirty
ninja explain: out/soong/.intermediates/art/cmdline/art_cmdline_tests/android_arm_armv7-a_core_cmdline_parser_test/obj/art/cmdline/cmdline_parser_test.o is dirty
...
In this case, art/cmdline/cmdline_parser_test.o was rebuilt because it uses asm_support_gen.h, which was generated by cpp-define-generator-data, which uses profile_compilation_info.h.
You'll likely need to cross-reference this data against the build graph in the
various .ninja files. The files are (mostly) human-readable, but a (slow) web
interface can be used by running NINJA_ARGS="-t browse <target>" m.
If the long part in the trace view of a build is a relatively solid block, then the performance is probably more related to how much time the actual build commands are taking than having extra dependencies, or slowdowns in soong/kati/ninja themselves.
Beyond looking at visible outliers in the trace view, we don't have any tooling to help in this area yet. It's possible to aggregate some of the raw data together, but since our builds are heavily parallelized, it's particularly easy for build commands to impact unrelated build commands. This is an area we'd like to improve -- we expect keeping track of user/system time per-action would provide more reliable data, but tracking some full-system data (memory/swap use, disk bandwidth, etc) may also be necessary.
Soong always loads the entire module graph, so as modules convert from Make to
Soong, mm is becoming closer to mma. This produces more correct builds, but
does slow down builds, as we need to verify/produce/load a larger build graph.
As of Android Q, loading large build graphs is fast, and in Android R, mm is
now an alias of mma.
In some cases, a tree would get into a state where Soong would be run twice on
every incremental build, even if there was nothing to do. This was fixed in
master with these changes, but they were too
significant to backport at the time. And while they fix this particular issue,
they appear to cause ninja to spend more time during every build loading the
.ninja_log / .ninja_deps files, especially as they become larger.
A workaround to get out of this state is to remove the build.ninja entry from
$OUT_DIR/.ninja_log:
sed -i "/\/build.ninja/d" $(get_build_var OUT_DIR)/.ninja_log