Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add line breaks between egXML examples #34

Open
4 of 9 tasks
alexduryee opened this issue Aug 9, 2019 · 0 comments
Open
4 of 9 tasks

add line breaks between egXML examples #34

alexduryee opened this issue Aug 9, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
Review This is being reviewed in order to decide whether it will be implemented Tech improvement This issue describes an enhancement to current processes

Comments

@alexduryee
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, examples in egXML elements run together (e.g. from EAD3's abbr):

<didnote>File also contains materials from the
  <abbr expan="American Civil Liberties
  Union"> ACLU </abbr>
</didnote>
<c02>
  <did>
     <unittitle>
       <abbr expan="United Nations Educational,
       Scientific and Cultural Organization">
       UNESCO </abbr>
     </unittitle>
  [. . .] </did>
</c02>

There should be a line break between these two examples, so that it's clear that they're separate examples of abbr instead of one long one.

Creator of issue

  1. Alexander Duryee
  2. NYPL

The issue relates to

  • EAC-CPF schema issue
  • EAC-CPF Tag Library issue
  • EAD schema issue
  • EAD Tag Library issue
  • Schema issue
  • Tag Library issue
  • Suggestions for all schemas
  • Suggestions for all Tag Libraries
  • Other

Wanted change/feature

  • Text: There should be clear line breaks between egXML examples.
@kerstarno kerstarno added Tech improvement This issue describes an enhancement to current processes Review This is being reviewed in order to decide whether it will be implemented labels Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Review This is being reviewed in order to decide whether it will be implemented Tech improvement This issue describes an enhancement to current processes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants