You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have noticed that legal information (access rights, licences, rights) of HVD data services is taken only from the instances of dcat:DataService and not from the instances of dcat:Distribution in Reporting query 6 - service legal information.
This is OK for "standalone" data services or services connected to datasets using dcat:servesDataset, not using distributions.
It is not OK for the data services connected to datasets through distributions. In that case, consistently with bulk download distributions, the legal information is attached to the Distribution, connecting to the data service using dcat:accessService. This service may serve multiple datasets, each with different legal information, distinguished by the distribution.
At least this is my take on it, and it is implemented like this in several data portals including the Czech and Slovak ones.
In the reporting requirements of the HVD IR, the notion terms of use is used. It has been agreed, by the Working Group for DCAT-AP HVD, that providing terms of use information is the same as providing legal information for a Data Service.
However, this is not related to where technically to get that information for a data service, and therefore I still think the case where we have the service connected via a distribution should be supported. I.e.:
:ds a dcat:Dataset ;
dcat:distribution :distro.
:distro a dcat:Distribution ;
dcterms:licence <http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/licence/CC_BY_4_0> ; #or something mapped to the NAL
dcat:accessService :service .
:service a dcat:DataService ;
dcat:endpointURL :api .
We do not want to duplicate the legal information from distribution to data service, as this could create a conflict when the service serves multiple datasets under different conditions.
Of course adding the Distribution legal information to the query would raise the question about what to do when there would be conflicting information on Distribution and Data Service, similarly to when there is conflicting information on Distribution and Dataset. But, as in the case of Dataset, this can be discouraged and left to the publisher to resolve.
This would be the query for taking the legal information of a data service from the distributions:
I have noticed that legal information (access rights, licences, rights) of HVD data services is taken only from the instances of
dcat:DataService
and not from the instances ofdcat:Distribution
in Reporting query 6 - service legal information.This is OK for "standalone" data services or services connected to datasets using
dcat:servesDataset
, not using distributions.It is not OK for the data services connected to datasets through
distributions
. In that case, consistently with bulk download distributions, the legal information is attached to the Distribution, connecting to the data service usingdcat:accessService
. This service may serve multiple datasets, each with different legal information, distinguished by the distribution.At least this is my take on it, and it is implemented like this in several data portals including the Czech and Slovak ones.
In DCAT-AP-HVD Legal information section, under the diagram, it says:
However, this is not related to where technically to get that information for a data service, and therefore I still think the case where we have the service connected via a distribution should be supported. I.e.:
We do not want to duplicate the legal information from distribution to data service, as this could create a conflict when the service serves multiple datasets under different conditions.
Current query 6 not taking this into account:
Of course adding the Distribution legal information to the query would raise the question about what to do when there would be conflicting information on Distribution and Data Service, similarly to when there is conflicting information on Distribution and Dataset. But, as in the case of Dataset, this can be discouraged and left to the publisher to resolve.
This would be the query for taking the legal information of a data service from the distributions:
Or, combined with the original query 6:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: