You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by alex-ozdemir September 24, 2024
Hi SMT community,
Thomas Hader and I have been developing SMT solvers that support a theory of finite fields. We've been ensuring compatibility between our solvers by agreeing upon a bespoke SMT-LIB interface for this theory. We think it is time to standardize that interface.
Below, we have attached a PDF with our proposal. We have presented our proposal at the SMT workshop and shared it with the SMT-LIB coordinators. Now, we are seeking broader community feedback.
If this theory interests you, please consider our proposal and let us know what you think. Comments and questions are both welcome. We encourage you to reply with your comments before October 31st.
Cheers,
Alex Ozdemir
Changes since the SMT workshop presentation.
We have removed the `#f` shorthand notation for literals, because it served the same purpose as the indexed literal notation.
Discussed in #29
Originally posted by alex-ozdemir September 24, 2024
Hi SMT community,
Thomas Hader and I have been developing SMT solvers that support a theory of finite fields. We've been ensuring compatibility between our solvers by agreeing upon a bespoke SMT-LIB interface for this theory. We think it is time to standardize that interface.
Below, we have attached a PDF with our proposal. We have presented our proposal at the SMT workshop and shared it with the SMT-LIB coordinators. Now, we are seeking broader community feedback.
If this theory interests you, please consider our proposal and let us know what you think. Comments and questions are both welcome. We encourage you to reply with your comments before October 31st.
Cheers,
Alex Ozdemir
Changes since the SMT workshop presentation.
smtlib-ff-proposal.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: