Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tacking Issue: Proposal: A Standard for the Theory of Finite Fields #30

Open
alex-ozdemir opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 Discussed in #29 · 0 comments
Open

Tacking Issue: Proposal: A Standard for the Theory of Finite Fields #30

alex-ozdemir opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 Discussed in #29 · 0 comments

Comments

@alex-ozdemir
Copy link

Discussed in #29

Originally posted by alex-ozdemir September 24, 2024
Hi SMT community,

Thomas Hader and I have been developing SMT solvers that support a theory of finite fields. We've been ensuring compatibility between our solvers by agreeing upon a bespoke SMT-LIB interface for this theory. We think it is time to standardize that interface.

Below, we have attached a PDF with our proposal. We have presented our proposal at the SMT workshop and shared it with the SMT-LIB coordinators. Now, we are seeking broader community feedback.

If this theory interests you, please consider our proposal and let us know what you think. Comments and questions are both welcome. We encourage you to reply with your comments before October 31st.

Cheers,
Alex Ozdemir

Changes since the SMT workshop presentation.
  • We have removed the `#f` shorthand notation for literals, because it served the same purpose as the indexed literal notation.

smtlib-ff-proposal.pdf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant