-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[later] pair fwd and bwd operators #84
Comments
If we have a cheap inverse of |
we can create a new type for that and Sherman Morrison formula |
vpuri3
added a commit
to vpuri3/SciMLOperators.jl
that referenced
this issue
May 10, 2023
@gaurav-arya do you wanna create a new issue for #84 (comment) with a design idea? |
Just did: #180 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If you have access to a cheap inverse for an operator,
A
, then it would be very convenient to use that forLinearAlgebra.ldiv!, Base.\
.Trivial example:
ldiv!
with diagonal is ~15x slower thanmul!
.This will also be useful for passing
jac
toSplitFunction
. Maybe this could help CliMA/ClimaCore.jl#41 not sure.I propose extending
InvertibleOperator
as follows:where
F
can be the inverse (SciML)Operator, or any object with 3 arg mul!, * defined.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: