You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can you please describe how mean 3D MPJPE was calculated in Table 5 of the paper? For example, row #1 has a mean of mean([89.48 134.38 70.31 123.27 146.67])=112.82, but a reported mean of 115.04. I calculate column #1 mean to be 74.78, but the reported mean is 59.79. There must be some weighting applied, but I cannot figure it out. It is based on sample length? Would it make sense to normalize to the length of the sample? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The reported average values are the averages of all the samples in each category, or essentially weighted averages.
I believe a weighted average might be more informative than the average of averages, but I understand this was not clearly explained and that it is common practice to report arithmetic averages.
Also, note that when evaluating the CNN with the frames from the repository, there are some differences in the averages of single recordings compared to table 5. This is due to changes and fixes done before the release of the code. However, the averages over movements, sessions, subjects, and the global average (all weighted averages) are within a few mm from the averages in table 5
Can you please describe how mean 3D MPJPE was calculated in Table 5 of the paper? For example, row #1 has a mean of mean([89.48 134.38 70.31 123.27 146.67])=112.82, but a reported mean of 115.04. I calculate column #1 mean to be 74.78, but the reported mean is 59.79. There must be some weighting applied, but I cannot figure it out. It is based on sample length? Would it make sense to normalize to the length of the sample? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: