-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
算法评价指标 #4
Comments
我其实不清楚,当时只是为了深入理解这个算法,所以用代码实现了一下,并没有做详细对比,不好意思
…---原始邮件---
发件人: ***@***.***>
发送时间: 2022年10月4日(周二) 上午10:57
收件人: ***@***.***>;
抄送: ***@***.***>;
主题: [Shelfcol/gps_imu_fusion] 算法评价指标 (Issue #4)
能否给出eskf和eskf_qk的结果对比或者指标对比,哪个更好一点?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
好的,另外我看对于低精度的imu,config里写了没有调出来,后面有再调吗?相同的数据在eskf上能调出来吗 |
还有个问题,imu在加载数据的时候已经做了坐标转换TransformCoordinate,为何在初始化的时候,设置初始姿态时还要做同样的转换,而不是直接设置成单位矩阵 |
还有个问题,eskf中的UpdateErrorState,W_不需要更新吗 |
后面上班了,暂时就没时间搞了
…---原始邮件---
发件人: ***@***.***>
发送时间: 2022年10月4日(周二) 中午11:20
收件人: ***@***.***>;
抄送: ***@***.******@***.***>;
主题: Re: [Shelfcol/gps_imu_fusion] 算法评价指标 (Issue #4)
我其实不清楚,当时只是为了深入理解这个算法,所以用代码实现了一下,并没有做详细对比,不好意思
…
---原始邮件--- 发件人: @.> 发送时间: 2022年10月4日(周二) 上午10:57 收件人: @.>; 抄送: @.>; 主题: [Shelfcol/gps_imu_fusion] 算法评价指标 (Issue #4) 能否给出eskf和eskf_qk的结果对比或者指标对比,哪个更好一点? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.>
好的,另外我看对于低精度的imu,config里写了没有调出来,后面有再调吗?相同的数据在eskf上能调出来吗
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
能否给出eskf和eskf_qk的结果对比或者指标对比,哪个更好一点?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: