You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, iv_xy function replaces 0 with 0.9 in order to calculate information value. Would it be more appropriate to replace with a value closer to 0 , let's say 0.01?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This replacement is to make sure the iv can be calculate in case of zero y labels. Replace with 0.1 or 0.9 would not affect the iv, since it might not occur in a real data sample after bining . I didn’t find any reference on this issue, if you have please post it here.
In a case that a binning process results to a bin with a small number of good class and zero of bad class then I suppose that replacing 0 to almost 1 (0.9) is different than replacing 0 to 0.01. What I mean is that in real cases where default rate is very low (2%) the fact that we appear defaults(0.9) in bins where the do not exist ( by converting 0 to 0.9 instead of 0.01) might lead to misconceptions.
Hi, iv_xy function replaces 0 with 0.9 in order to calculate information value. Would it be more appropriate to replace with a value closer to 0 , let's say 0.01?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: