You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the project, gem and executable each use a different spelling:
The project in GitHub is called erb-lint
The gem is called erb_lint
The executable is called erblint
Fortunately, the configuration file matches the GitHub project and is called .erb-lint.yml.
This situation causes some confusion. For me, the main problem is finding the call to erblint in my zsh history, but it also makes finding the gem on rubygems.org more difficult.
How about standardizing on erb-lint? The other spellings could be kept as a fallback, by:
Having both erblint and erb-lint as executables
Having both erb_lint and erb-lint gems, where one would depend on the other
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the project, gem and executable each use a different spelling:
erb-lint
erb_lint
erblint
Fortunately, the configuration file matches the GitHub project and is called
.erb-lint.yml
.This situation causes some confusion. For me, the main problem is finding the call to
erblint
in my zsh history, but it also makes finding the gem on rubygems.org more difficult.How about standardizing on
erb-lint
? The other spellings could be kept as a fallback, by:erblint
anderb-lint
as executableserb_lint
anderb-lint
gems, where one would depend on the otherThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: