You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm encountering very high (e.g., Inf) and very low (e.g., < -2000) values in both scPDSI and conventional PDSI calculations using the scPDSI package.
Below I selected two pixels of my drought-mapping area as examples. One results in abnormal scPDSI value, and the other results in (not self calibrated) PDSI values:
The p vectors are precipitation (mm), and the pe vectors are evapotranspiration (mm). I replaced 0 values as 0.0001. Could you please advise on whether this is expected or if there might be a bug in the package? Any guidance on handling such cases would be greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm encountering very high (e.g., Inf) and very low (e.g., < -2000) values in both scPDSI and conventional PDSI calculations using the scPDSI package.
Below I selected two pixels of my drought-mapping area as examples. One results in abnormal scPDSI value, and the other results in (not self calibrated) PDSI values:
The p vectors are precipitation (mm), and the pe vectors are evapotranspiration (mm). I replaced 0 values as 0.0001. Could you please advise on whether this is expected or if there might be a bug in the package? Any guidance on handling such cases would be greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: