Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip inaccessible paths for default data dir resolution. #8812

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lhunath
Copy link

@lhunath lhunath commented Nov 28, 2024

Fixes PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/root/.config/sickchill/sickbeard.db' when running as non-root user, despite passing --data-dir to a different path.

Proposed changes in this pull request:

  • When resolving the default data-dir, skip any candidate paths which are inaccessible

  • PR is based on the DEVELOP branch

  • Don't send big changes all at once. Split up big PRs into multiple smaller PRs that are easier to manage and review

  • Read contribution guide

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling for directory access issues, improving the app's stability when encountering permission errors.
    • Improved the ability to verify file accessibility in directories, ensuring smoother operation when files exist but are not readable.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the choose_data_dir function in the sickchill/helper/common.py file. The key update is the replacement of the file existence check using exists() with a permission check using os.access() to verify read access for specific files in the directory paths. This adjustment allows the function to determine if it can read the files instead of merely checking for their existence, maintaining the overall logic and structure of the function.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
sickchill/helper/common.py Replaced file existence check with permission check using os.access() in choose_data_dir function.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant choose_data_dir
    participant FileSystem

    User->>choose_data_dir: Request to choose data directory
    choose_data_dir->>FileSystem: Check read access for files in directory
    alt No read access
        choose_data_dir->>choose_data_dir: Check next directory
    else Read access granted
        choose_data_dir->>User: Return valid directory
    end
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb582c7 and aabad9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • sickchill/helper/common.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • sickchill/helper/common.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sickchill/helper/common.py (1)

443-447: LGTM! The error handling addresses the permission issue effectively.

The added try-except block correctly handles the PermissionError when checking file existence, allowing the function to gracefully skip inaccessible paths and continue searching other locations.

However, consider adding debug logging to help troubleshoot permission issues:

 try:
     if location.joinpath(check).exists():
         return location.resolve()
 except PermissionError:
+    logger.debug(f"Skipping inaccessible path {location}: Permission denied")
     continue
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e508b3 and bb582c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • sickchill/helper/common.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sickchill/helper/common.py (1)

443-447: Verify the impact on non-root installations.

Since this change affects the data directory resolution, we should verify it works correctly for non-root installations.

Consider documenting this behavior in the installation guide or README to help users understand the data directory resolution process, especially for non-root installations.

✅ Verification successful

Data directory resolution works correctly for non-root installations

The code changes are safe for non-root installations based on the following evidence:

  • The choose_data_dir function follows a clear precedence order:
    1. Checks old data directory (program's parent directory)
    2. Checks user's home directory (~/sickchill)
    3. Uses proper XDG config directory (appdirs.user_config_dir)
  • The debian-ubuntu install script explicitly documents the data directory locations:
    • /var/lib/sickchill/.config/sickchill/ when run as sickchill user
    • /home/user/.config/sickchill/ when run as regular user
    • Custom location with --datadir flag
  • The PermissionError handling ensures graceful fallback if a location is inaccessible
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related test cases
rg -l "choose_data_dir|data_dir" tests/
# Search for documentation about installation
fd -g "INSTALL*" -g "README*" -g "docs/*.md"

Length of output: 239


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and documentation with case-insensitive patterns
fd -i "readme|install" .
fd "docs" .

# Search for data directory related code and tests
rg -l "data_dir|choose_data_dir|get_data_dir" .

# Look for permission-related error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'except PermissionError: $$$'

Length of output: 401


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of README for installation instructions
cat README.md

# Check the data directory resolution logic in the main files
rg -A 5 -B 5 "data_dir|choose_data_dir" sickchill/helper/common.py
rg -A 5 -B 5 "data_dir" SickChill.py

# Check the debian installation script for any data directory handling
cat contrib/debian-ubuntu-install.sh

Length of output: 14788

Comment on lines 443 to 447
try:
if location.joinpath(check).exists():
return location.resolve()
except PermissionError:
continue
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the search results, I can generate the final response now:

Consider handling OSError for path operations

The codebase consistently handles OSError for similar filesystem operations, as seen in multiple files. For example:

  • sickchill/tv.py handles OSError for file operations with detailed error logging
  • sickchill/oldbeard/browser.py catches OSError during path operations with appropriate logging
  • sickchill/oldbeard/helpers.py has multiple instances of OSError handling for filesystem operations
try:
    if location.joinpath(check).exists():
        return location.resolve()
-except PermissionError:
+except OSError as error:  # Covers PermissionError and other filesystem errors
+    logger.debug(f"Failed to check path {location}: {error}")
    continue
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify error handling for other potential filesystem exceptions.

While PermissionError is handled, other filesystem-related exceptions might occur during path resolution.

Consider handling other potential filesystem exceptions:

 try:
     if location.joinpath(check).exists():
         return location.resolve()
-except PermissionError:
+except (PermissionError, OSError) as e:
+    logger.debug(f"Skipping path {location}: {str(e)}")
     continue
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar error handling patterns in the codebase
rg -A 2 "except (PermissionError|OSError|IOError)"

# Search for filesystem operations that might need similar error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
  .exists()
  $$$
} except $_ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 9119

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should try to avoid the old EAFP pattern in modern python. I don't like to just discard random exceptions. However, there are other ways.

Maybe check if user has access to the path?

found_location = location.joinpath(check).resolve()
if found_location.exists() and os.access(found_location):
    return location.resolve()

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@miigotu, understood. Avoiding the EAFP pattern here makes sense. Using os.access() to check if the user has access to the path is a better approach. Thank you for the guidance.


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: miigotu
PR: SickChill/sickchill#8812
File: sickchill/helper/common.py:443-447
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T05:51:19.578Z
Learning: In the `choose_data_dir` function in `sickchill/helper/common.py`, avoid using try-except blocks to handle `PermissionError` or `OSError` when checking for path existence or access. Instead, check if the user has access to the path using `os.access()` to determine if the user has the necessary permissions, following the preference to avoid the EAFP pattern in modern Python.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@miigotu Fair point, though I was primarily motivated by consistency with the rest of the file in my approach. I've committed an alternative in 3c6ca47. Note that exists() raises, so the check should happen before it, and os.access takes an argument + already performs the exists check internally (as well as a readable check, now).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants