Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PolyBenchC Benchmarks #58

Open
SimonJF opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

PolyBenchC Benchmarks #58

SimonJF opened this issue Jul 19, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
emscripten Needed for Emscripten support performance evaluation Things that need doing so we know how the compiler performs

Comments

@SimonJF
Copy link
Owner

SimonJF commented Jul 19, 2018

The original WASM paper used PolyBenchC as a benchmark suite. It would be interesting to get this working with cmm_of_wasm, so we can get some performance measurements against:

  • The interpreter
  • wasm2c
  • The V8 JIT
  • The SpiderMonkey JIT

My guess is we're not going to match the production-quality JITs, and that we will easily obliterate the performance of the interpreter. But wasm2c is the interesting one, as it's the only other pipeline to getting natively-compiled WASM.
@SimonJF SimonJF added the performance evaluation Things that need doing so we know how the compiler performs label Jul 19, 2018
@SimonJF SimonJF added the emscripten Needed for Emscripten support label Jul 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
emscripten Needed for Emscripten support performance evaluation Things that need doing so we know how the compiler performs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SimonJF