Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add onboarding ai agent #86

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wtfdivyansh
Copy link
Contributor

@wtfdivyansh wtfdivyansh commented Nov 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a chat interface with components for user and bot messages, allowing for interactive communication.
    • Added onboarding layout and page components to enhance user experience during the onboarding process.
  • Enhancements

    • Implemented AI message handling and state management for improved chat functionality.
    • Added a new isOnboarding field to user profiles to track onboarding status.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated routing logic to ensure proper redirection based on user onboarding status.
  • Dependencies

    • Added new dependencies for AI integration to enhance functionality.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 30, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
plura-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 30, 2024 3:31pm
plura-status ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 30, 2024 3:31pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request encompass modifications to several files in the plura project. Key updates include changing the port in the package.json scripts for both the API and app, introducing new components for chat functionality in the onboarding process, and enhancing user authentication with an onboarding status in the database schema. Additionally, new dependencies were added to the app's package.json, and middleware logic was refined to manage user redirection based on onboarding status.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/api/package.json Updated start and preview scripts to change port from 5555 to 3001.
apps/app/actions/action.tsx Added types ServerMessage, ClientMessage, and method sendMessage for message handling.
apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/layout.tsx Introduced OnboardingLayout component to wrap children with AI functionality.
apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/page.tsx Added Onboarding component to render Chatbox.
apps/app/app/(routes)/layout.tsx Introduced RouteLayout component to manage route layout with sidebar state based on cookies.
apps/app/app/layout.tsx Simplified RootLayout by removing sidebar-related logic and components.
apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/chatList.tsx Added ChatList component to render a list of chat messages.
apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/chatbox.tsx Introduced Chatbox component for user input and message management.
apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/message.tsx Added components UserMessage, BotMessage, and BotCard for chat message rendering.
apps/app/lib/ai.tsx Introduced AI module with types AIState, UIState, and constant AI for AI interactions.
apps/app/middleware.ts Updated authMiddleware to manage user redirection based on onboarding status.
apps/app/package.json Added new dependencies: @ai-sdk/google, @ai-sdk/togetherai, and ai.
packages/auth/src/auth.ts Enhanced betterAuth configuration with isOnboarding field in user model.
packages/database/prisma/migrations/20241128154235_onboarding/migration.sql Added isOnboarding column to user table in the database schema.
packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma Added isOnboarding field to User model in Prisma schema.

Possibly related PRs

  • feature/auth #33: Updates to the package.json scripts for the plura-api, specifically changing the port for the start and preview scripts.
  • auth #34: Modifications to API route handling, including the OPTIONS method, which may relate to the updated ports in the main PR.
  • update auth to better-auth v1 #71: Updates the better-auth package version, potentially relevant to the authentication processes affected by the changes in the main PR.

🐰 In a world of code, we hop and play,
With ports now set to 3001 today!
New chats are blooming, messages flow,
Onboarding's a breeze, watch our project grow!
With AI by our side, we leap and bound,
In this code-filled garden, joy is found! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 30, 2024

@wtfdivyansh is attempting to deploy a commit to the BlueFinZ Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/page.tsx (1)

3-6: Consider adding error boundaries and loading states.

The component could benefit from additional robustness:

  1. Add error boundaries to handle potential Chatbox failures
  2. Include loading states for better UX
  3. Add metadata for SEO

Consider updating the component like this:

+import { Suspense } from 'react';
+import { ErrorBoundary } from '@/components/error-boundary';
 import Chatbox from "@/components/custom/onboarding/chatbox";
+import Loading from "@/components/loading";
+
+export const metadata = {
+  title: 'Onboarding - Plura',
+  description: 'Complete your account setup with our AI assistant',
+};

 export default function Onboarding() {
-  return <Chatbox />
+  return (
+    <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Something went wrong</div>}>
+      <Suspense fallback={<Loading />}>
+        <Chatbox />
+      </Suspense>
+    </ErrorBoundary>
+  );
 }
apps/app/app/(routes)/layout.tsx (1)

12-16: Consider adding error boundaries and loading states

The layout should gracefully handle errors in child components and show appropriate loading states.

+import { ErrorBoundary } from '@/components/error-boundary';
+import { Suspense } from 'react';

       <div className="p-2">
         <ProgressBar />
         <Infobar />
-        {children}
+        <ErrorBoundary>
+          <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
+            {children}
+          </Suspense>
+        </ErrorBoundary>
apps/app/actions/action.tsx (2)

38-38: Remove console.log statement

Production code should not contain console.log statements.

-        console.log("done", ...history.get());

46-46: Use a more reliable ID generation method

Using Date.now() for IDs could lead to collisions in high-frequency message scenarios.

Consider using a UUID library:

-    id: Date.now(),
+    id: crypto.randomUUID(),

Note: This would require updating the ClientMessage type to use string IDs.

packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1)

23-29: Fix inconsistent spacing in field configuration.

The spacing after colons is inconsistent in this block.

-      isOnboarding: {
-        type: "boolean",
-        nullable:false,
-        required:true,
-        input:false,
-        defaultValue: false
-      }
+      isOnboarding: {
+        type: "boolean",
+        nullable: false,
+        required: true,
+        input: false,
+        defaultValue: false
+      }
apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/message.tsx (1)

5-16: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.

The message components share similar structure. Consider creating a base MessageBubble component to reduce duplication.

type MessageBubbleProps = {
  children: React.ReactNode;
  icon: React.ReactNode;
  className?: string;
  hideIcon?: boolean;
};

function MessageBubble({ children, icon, className, hideIcon = false }: MessageBubbleProps) {
  return (
    <div className={cn("group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12", className)}>
      <div
        className={cn(
          "flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm",
          !hideIcon && "invisible"
        )}
      >
        {icon}
      </div>
      <div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">{children}</div>
    </div>
  );
}

// Usage:
export function UserMessage({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  return <MessageBubble icon={<UserIcon />}>{children}</MessageBubble>;
}

Also applies to: 18-35, 37-57

apps/app/lib/ai.tsx (2)

7-13: Consider adding type validation for sendMessage response

The sendMessage action's return type should be validated against the ClientMessage type to ensure type safety.

 export const AI = createAI<
   AIState,
   UIState,
   {
-    sendMessage: (message: string) => Promise<ClientMessage>;
+    sendMessage: (message: string) => Promise<ClientMessage & {
+      id: string;
+      content: string;
+      role: 'user' | 'assistant';
+    }>;
   }

14-18: Consider enhancing the AI implementation for onboarding

Given this is an onboarding AI agent (as per PR title), consider adding:

  1. Documentation for the empty initial states
  2. Error handling for the sendMessage action
  3. Additional onboarding-specific actions (e.g., guiding users through specific steps)

Would you like me to help implement these enhancements? I can suggest:

  • Additional onboarding-specific actions
  • Error handling middleware
  • State initialization with onboarding context
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc3e5b5 and cd0fb69.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
  • apps/api/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/actions/action.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/app/(routes)/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/app/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/chatList.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/chatbox.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/message.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/lib/ai.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/app/middleware.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/app/package.json (2 hunks)
  • packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/database/prisma/migrations/20241128154235_onboarding/migration.sql (1 hunks)
  • packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
packages/database/prisma/migrations/20241128154235_onboarding/migration.sql (1)

1-2: LGTM! Verify the migration's impact on existing users.

The migration looks correct with appropriate constraints and default value.

Let's verify if there are any existing users that might be affected:

✅ Verification successful

Migration is safe and properly integrated in the codebase

The migration is well integrated:

  • The schema.prisma already includes the isOnboarding field with matching constraints
  • The field is properly used in middleware for onboarding flow control
  • The auth configuration includes proper type definition for the field
  • Default value of false ensures existing users will be directed to onboarding
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any direct user table references in the codebase that might need updating
rg -l "user.*isOnboarding|isOnboarding.*user" --type ts --type tsx

# Check for any TypeScript interfaces or types that need to be updated
ast-grep --pattern 'interface User {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any direct user table references in the codebase that might need updating
rg -l "user.*isOnboarding|isOnboarding.*user" --type typescript

# Look for User interface/type definitions
rg -A 5 "interface User|type User" --type typescript

# Check Prisma schema for user model definition
fd "schema.prisma" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 1891


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Try with different file extensions for TypeScript files
rg -l "user.*isOnboarding|isOnboarding.*user" -g "*.ts"

# Search for any files that might be using the User model or isOnboarding field
rg -A 3 "isOnboarding" -g "*.ts"

# Look for User type definitions with different extension pattern
rg -A 5 "interface User|type User" -g "*.ts"

Length of output: 801

apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/layout.tsx (1)

1-5: Verify AI component implementation and add error handling.

While the layout looks clean, we should verify the AI component implementation and consider adding error handling.

Let's verify the AI component implementation:

Consider enhancing the layout with error handling:

 import { AI } from "@/lib/ai";
+import { ErrorBoundary } from '@/components/error-boundary';

 export default function OnboardingLayout({children}: {children: React.ReactNode}) {
-  return <AI>{children}</AI>;
+  return (
+    <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>AI service unavailable</div>}>
+      <AI>{children}</AI>
+    </ErrorBoundary>
+  );
 }
apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/chatList.tsx (1)

1-1: Verify the UIState type import

Let's verify the type definition to ensure proper typing of the messages prop.

✅ Verification successful

UIState type import is correctly defined and used

The UIState type is properly defined in lib/ai.tsx as an alias for ClientMessage[], where ClientMessage is a well-defined type in actions/action.tsx containing the expected message properties (id, role, and display). The import and usage in chatList.tsx is correct and consistent with the type definition.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for UIState type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type UIState = {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 47


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find UIState definition
# First, let's find all files that mention UIState
rg "UIState" -l

# Then let's get more context around UIState mentions
rg "UIState" -B 2 -A 5

Length of output: 2685


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the ClientMessage type definition since UIState is defined as ClientMessage[]
rg "type ClientMessage" -B 2 -A 5

# Also search for any interface definition of ClientMessage
rg "interface ClientMessage" -B 2 -A 5

Length of output: 404

apps/app/app/layout.tsx (1)

18-33: LGTM! Verify impact on existing routes

The simplification of the root layout and moving layout-specific components to route layouts is a good architectural decision. However, let's verify the impact on existing routes.

✅ Verification successful

Root layout changes are properly handled by route layout

The route layout (apps/app/(routes)/layout.tsx) correctly implements all the necessary components that were removed from the root layout, including:

  • Sidebar implementation with AppSidebar and SidebarProvider
  • Progress bar and info bar components
  • Proper layout structure for child components

Both existing routes ([slug] and settings) are wrapped by this layout and their page components are structured to work within this layout hierarchy.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for routes that might be affected by the layout change
fd --type f "page.tsx" "apps/app/app/(routes)"

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of route pages to verify their layout dependencies
echo "=== Content of [slug]/page.tsx ==="
cat "apps/app/app/(routes)/[slug]/page.tsx"
echo -e "\n=== Content of settings/page.tsx ==="
cat "apps/app/app/(routes)/settings/page.tsx"

# Check if there are any layout files in the routes
echo -e "\n=== Layout files in routes ==="
fd --type f "layout.tsx" "apps/app/app/(routes)"

Length of output: 6205


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the route layout to verify it handles the sidebar and other layout components
cat "apps/app/app/(routes)/layout.tsx"

Length of output: 755

apps/app/actions/action.tsx (1)

30-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review the system prompt restrictions

The system prompt restricts responses to 10 words, which might be too limiting for meaningful onboarding interactions.

Consider adjusting the system prompt to be more flexible and onboarding-specific:

-    system: "You are a helpful assistant. give answer in only 10 words",
+    system: "You are an onboarding assistant helping new users understand our platform. Keep responses concise but informative.",
✅ Verification successful

Consider increasing response length limit for better user experience

The 10-word response limit is indeed restrictive and unique in the codebase, as verified by searching all system prompts. This constraint could prevent the AI from providing adequate guidance during onboarding interactions.

  • apps/app/actions/action.tsx: Current 10-word limit may hinder:
    • Proper explanation of platform features
    • Meaningful responses to user questions
    • Natural conversation flow

The suggested modification to allow concise but informative responses would improve the user experience while maintaining response brevity.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other system prompts in the codebase for consistency
rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' "system.*:.*\".*\"" 

Length of output: 143

apps/app/middleware.ts (1)

43-43: Review middleware matcher configuration

The current matcher configuration might be too broad. Consider adding specific paths that need authentication.

Consider making the matcher more specific to your needs:

-  matcher: ['/((?!api|_next/static|_next/image|favicon.ico|sitemap.xml|robots.txt).*)']
+  matcher: [
+    '/onboarding/:path*',
+    '/home/:path*',
+    '/dashboard/:path*',
+    '/settings/:path*'
+  ]
✅ Verification successful

Current middleware matcher configuration is appropriate

The current matcher configuration is actually well-suited for this application's needs because:

  1. The middleware implements a global authentication check that should run on all routes except the explicitly excluded ones
  2. The code shows proper handling of authentication states and redirects:
    • Redirects unauthenticated users to the auth page
    • Handles onboarding state appropriately
    • Excludes necessary public assets and API routes

The excluded paths (api, _next/static, _next/image, favicon.ico, sitemap.xml, robots.txt) are the standard Next.js paths that should remain public, making the current configuration secure and maintainable.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for public routes that might need to be excluded
rg -l "export const dynamic = 'force-static'" 

Length of output: 53


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for public routes and authentication patterns in a different way
# First, let's look for route files
fd "page.tsx" "app"

# Then, let's look for authentication checks in middleware
rg -A 5 "auth" middleware.ts

# Also check for any route protection patterns
rg -l "useAuth|getSession|withAuth|isAuthenticated|requireAuth"

Length of output: 398


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's correct the path and check the middleware content
cat apps/app/middleware.ts

# Let's also check the structure of protected routes
fd . apps/www/app/(auth)
fd . apps/app

# Check authentication implementation
rg -A 5 "useAuth|getSession|withAuth|isAuthenticated|requireAuth" apps/www/lib/server.ts apps/www/app/(auth)/dashboard/page.tsx

Length of output: 1646

packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma (1)

20-20: LGTM! Verify database migration impact.

The isOnboarding field addition follows best practices with appropriate type and default value.

Let's verify the migration impact:

✅ Verification successful

Migration and usage verified - implementation is sound

The isOnboarding field is properly implemented with:

  • Clean migration that adds the column with appropriate default value
  • Proper usage in middleware for onboarding flow control
  • Correct type definition in auth package
  • No foreign key constraints or complex dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any foreign key constraints or indexes referencing this field
rg -A 5 "isOnboarding" "packages/database/prisma/migrations"

# Check for any direct field usage in the codebase
rg "isOnboarding" --type typescript

Length of output: 286


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any direct field usage in the codebase with ripgrep
rg "isOnboarding"

# Check migration files to understand the full context
fd "migration.sql" packages/database/prisma/migrations --exec cat {}

Length of output: 4250

packages/auth/src/auth.ts (1)

21-31: LGTM! Security-conscious field configuration.

The isOnboarding field configuration is well-structured with appropriate security constraints:

  • Prevents client-side modification (input: false)
  • Ensures consistent state (nullable: false, required: true)
  • Matches database schema definition
apps/app/package.json (1)

40-40: Verify compatibility with React RC version

The ai package needs to be verified for compatibility with React 19.0.0-rc that's being used in the project.

✅ Verification successful

ai package is compatible with React 19.0.0-rc

The ai package explicitly lists React 19.0.0-rc in its peer dependencies ("react": "^18 || ^19 || ^19.0.0-rc"), and there are no open React-related issues in the repository. The package is fully compatible with the React version being used in the project.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ai package's peer dependencies and React compatibility
echo "Checking ai package details:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/ai | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest, .versions[.["dist-tags"].latest].peerDependencies'

# Look for React-related issues
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "vercel", name: "ai") {
    issues(last: 5, states: OPEN, labels: ["react"]) {
      nodes {
        title
        createdAt
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 499

apps/api/package.json (1)

7-8: Port change looks good, but verify integration points.

The port change from 5555 to 3001 is consistent across start and preview scripts. However, since this API will be serving the new AI agent functionality, we should ensure all integration points are updated.

Let's verify no hardcoded references to the old port exist:

✅ Verification successful

Port change is consistent across the codebase

The port change from 5555 to 3001 appears to be safe as:

  • No references to the old port (5555) were found in the codebase
  • Port 3001 is consistently used across multiple components:
    • Authentication service (packages/auth/src/auth.ts)
    • Web application (apps/www/lib/server.ts)
    • Auth client (apps/app/middleware.ts)

The integration points are properly configured to use the new port in both development and production environments.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to port 5555 in the codebase
rg -g '!package.json' '5555'

# Search for environment files that might need updating
fd -g '.env*'

Length of output: 252


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to port 5555 in the codebase, including hidden files
rg -g '!package.json' --hidden '5555'

# Search for environment files and docker files that might contain port configurations
fd -H -e env -e env.example -e env.local -e env.development -e env.production -e dockerfile -e yml -e yaml

# Search for port 3001 references to understand the integration points
rg -g '!package.json' '3001'

Length of output: 838

apps/app/lib/ai.tsx (3)

4-5: LGTM! Clear and well-defined types

The type definitions are clear, properly exported, and follow TypeScript conventions.


1-2: Verify the imported types and function implementation

The imports look correct, but we should ensure that the imported types and function from @/actions/action are properly implemented and type-safe.

✅ Verification successful

Types and function implementation are properly defined and type-safe

The imported types and function are well-implemented in apps/app/actions/action.tsx:

  • ServerMessage and ClientMessage types are properly defined with appropriate fields and type constraints
  • sendMessage function is correctly typed, accepting a string message and returning a Promise with the expected ClientMessage shape
  • The implementation is being used correctly in the AI configuration and chatbox component
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of imported types and function
# Look for ClientMessage and ServerMessage type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type (ClientMessage|ServerMessage) = {
  $$$
}'

# Look for sendMessage function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const sendMessage = async ($$$) => {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 137


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the type definitions and function
# First, let's locate the action file
fd "action.ts" --type f

# Then, let's examine its contents
rg -A 5 "type (ClientMessage|ServerMessage)" --type ts
rg -A 5 "sendMessage" --type ts

Length of output: 2500


1-19: Verify integration with the onboarding flow

While the AI implementation looks good as a foundation, we should verify its integration with:

  1. The onboarding flow in the UI components
  2. User session management
  3. The database schema changes mentioned in the PR summary
✅ Verification successful

AI implementation is properly integrated with the onboarding flow

The verification shows that the AI implementation is well-integrated with:

  1. User session management through middleware that properly handles onboarding state
  2. Database schema with isOnboarding field in the User model
  3. Complete onboarding UI components (Chatbox, Messages) using the AI context
  4. Proper message handling and display components for both user and bot interactions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify integration with onboarding components and user flow

# Look for onboarding-related components
fd -e tsx -e ts --exec grep -l "onboarding" {}

# Check for user session management integration
ast-grep --pattern 'useSession|getSession|withAuth'

# Look for database schema changes related to onboarding
fd "schema.prisma" --exec grep -A 5 -B 5 "onboarding" {}

Length of output: 262


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the onboarding-related files more closely

# Check the middleware implementation
cat apps/app/middleware.ts

# Examine the onboarding page
cat "apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/page.tsx"

# Look at the actions implementation
cat apps/app/actions/action.tsx

# Search for AI component usage
rg -l "AI" apps/app/app/

Length of output: 3055


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the remaining components

# Check the chatbox component
cat "@/components/custom/onboarding/chatbox"

# Check the onboarding layout
cat "apps/app/app/(onboarding)/onboarding/layout.tsx"

# Look for BotMessage component
cat "@/components/custom/onboarding/message"

# Check for any database schema
fd "schema.prisma"

Length of output: 492


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the components with correct paths and schema

# Check for chatbox component with correct path structure
fd -e tsx -e ts "chatbox" apps/app/components

# Look for message component
fd -e tsx -e ts "message" apps/app/components

# Examine the database schema
cat packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma

Length of output: 1902


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Final check of the chatbox and message components

# Examine the chatbox implementation
cat apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/chatbox.tsx

# Check the message component
cat apps/app/components/custom/onboarding/message.tsx

Length of output: 2684

Comment on lines +8 to +12
{messages.map((message, index) => (
<div key={index} className="pb-4">
{message.display}
</div>
))}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid using array indices as React keys

Using array indices as keys can lead to rendering issues when messages are reordered, deleted, or inserted. Consider using unique message IDs instead.

-      {messages.map((message, index) => (
-        <div key={index} className="pb-4">
+      {messages.map((message) => (
+        <div key={message.id} className="pb-4">

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +6 to +14
return (
<div className="relative mx-auto max-w-2xl px-4">
{messages.map((message, index) => (
<div key={index} className="pb-4">
{message.display}
</div>
))}
</div>
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance accessibility and message differentiation

The chat messages lack semantic structure and visual differentiation between user and AI messages.

   return (
-    <div className="relative mx-auto max-w-2xl px-4">
+    <div 
+      className="relative mx-auto max-w-2xl px-4"
+      role="log"
+      aria-label="Chat messages"
+    >
       {messages.map((message) => (
-        <div key={index} className="pb-4">
+        <article 
+          key={message.id} 
+          className={`pb-4 ${
+            message.role === 'assistant' 
+              ? 'bg-muted/50 p-4 rounded-lg' 
+              : ''
+          }`}
+        >
           {message.display}
-        </div>
+        </article>
       ))}
     </div>
   );

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +7 to +8
const cookieStore = await cookies();
const defaultOpen = cookieStore.get("plura-sidebar:state")?.value === "true";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for cookie access

The cookie access should handle potential errors and provide fallback behavior.

-  const cookieStore = await cookies();
-  const defaultOpen = cookieStore.get("plura-sidebar:state")?.value === "true";
+  const defaultOpen = await (async () => {
+    try {
+      const cookieStore = await cookies();
+      return cookieStore.get("plura-sidebar:state")?.value === "true";
+    } catch (error) {
+      console.error('Failed to access cookies:', error);
+      return false;
+    }
+  })();
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const cookieStore = await cookies();
const defaultOpen = cookieStore.get("plura-sidebar:state")?.value === "true";
const defaultOpen = await (async () => {
try {
const cookieStore = await cookies();
return cookieStore.get("plura-sidebar:state")?.value === "true";
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to access cookies:', error);
return false;
}
})();

Comment on lines +26 to +27
const history = getMutableAIState<typeof AI>();
history.update([...history.get(), { role: "user", content: message }]);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement proper state management for message history

The current implementation might lead to memory issues as the history grows indefinitely.

Consider:

  1. Implementing a maximum history size
  2. Cleaning up old messages
  3. Using a more robust state management solution
+ const MAX_HISTORY_SIZE = 50;
  const history = getMutableAIState<typeof AI>();
- history.update([...history.get(), { role: "user", content: message }]);
+ const currentHistory = history.get();
+ const newHistory = [...currentHistory.slice(-MAX_HISTORY_SIZE), { role: "user", content: message }];
+ history.update(newHistory);

Also applies to: 34-39

Comment on lines +19 to +50
export const sendMessage = async (
message: string
): Promise<{
id: number;
role: "user" | "assistant";
display: ReactNode;
}> => {
const history = getMutableAIState<typeof AI>();
history.update([...history.get(), { role: "user", content: message }]);
const response = await streamUI({
model: togetherai("deepseek-ai/deepseek-llm-67b-chat"),
system: "You are a helpful assistant. give answer in only 10 words",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: message }, ...history.get()],
text: ({ content, done }) => {
if (done) {
history.update([
...history.get(),
{ role: "assistant", content: content },
]);
console.log("done", ...history.get());
}
return <BotMessage>{content}</BotMessage>;
},
});


return {
id: Date.now(),
role: "assistant" as const,
display: response.value,
};
};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling and input validation

The function lacks error handling for API failures and input validation.

Consider implementing:

  1. Input validation for empty messages
  2. Error handling for API calls
  3. Timeout handling for streaming
 export const sendMessage = async (
   message: string
 ): Promise<ClientMessage> => {
+  if (!message?.trim()) {
+    throw new Error('Message cannot be empty');
+  }
+
   const history = getMutableAIState<typeof AI>();
   try {
     // ... existing code ...
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error('Error in AI response:', error);
+    throw new Error('Failed to get AI response');
+  }
 };

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ const redirectUrl =
process.env.NODE_ENV === "production"
? "https://www.plura.pro/auth"
: "http://localhost:3003/auth";
const appDomain = process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "https://app.plura.pro" : "http://localhost:3002";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use environment variables for domain configuration

Hardcoding domains in the code makes it less maintainable and harder to configure.

-const appDomain = process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "https://app.plura.pro" : "http://localhost:3002";
+const appDomain = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_DOMAIN || (
+  process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "https://app.plura.pro" : "http://localhost:3002"
+);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const appDomain = process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "https://app.plura.pro" : "http://localhost:3002";
const appDomain = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_DOMAIN || (
process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "https://app.plura.pro" : "http://localhost:3002"
);

Comment on lines +32 to +37
if (!currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && !session.user.isOnboarding) {
return NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/onboarding`);
}
if (currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && session.user.isOnboarding) {
return NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/home`);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Prevent potential redirect loops

The current implementation might cause redirect loops if the session state is inconsistent.

Add additional checks:

+  const MAX_REDIRECTS = 3;
+  const redirectCount = parseInt(request.headers.get('x-redirect-count') || '0');
+  
+  if (redirectCount >= MAX_REDIRECTS) {
+    return new NextResponse('Too many redirects', { status: 500 });
+  }
+
   if (!currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && !session.user.isOnboarding) {
-    return NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/onboarding`);
+    const response = NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/onboarding`);
+    response.headers.set('x-redirect-count', (redirectCount + 1).toString());
+    return response;
   }
   if (currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && session.user.isOnboarding) {
-    return NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/home`);
+    const response = NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/home`);
+    response.headers.set('x-redirect-count', (redirectCount + 1).toString());
+    return response;
   }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (!currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && !session.user.isOnboarding) {
return NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/onboarding`);
}
if (currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && session.user.isOnboarding) {
return NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/home`);
}
const MAX_REDIRECTS = 3;
const redirectCount = parseInt(request.headers.get('x-redirect-count') || '0');
if (redirectCount >= MAX_REDIRECTS) {
return new NextResponse('Too many redirects', { status: 500 });
}
if (!currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && !session.user.isOnboarding) {
const response = NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/onboarding`);
response.headers.set('x-redirect-count', (redirectCount + 1).toString());
return response;
}
if (currentPath.startsWith("/onboarding") && session.user.isOnboarding) {
const response = NextResponse.redirect(`${appDomain}/home`);
response.headers.set('x-redirect-count', (redirectCount + 1).toString());
return response;
}

Comment on lines +5 to +57
export function UserMessage({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
return (
<div className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
<div className="flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-background">
<UserIcon />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
}

export function BotMessage({
children,
className,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
className?: string;
}) {
return (
<div className={cn("group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12", className)}>
<div className="flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-primary text-primary-foreground">
<Sparkle />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
}

export function BotCard({
children,
showAvatar = true,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
showAvatar?: boolean;
}) {
return (
<div className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
<div
className={cn(
"flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-primary text-primary-foreground",
!showAvatar && "invisible"
)}
>
<Sparkle />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 px-1">{children}</div>
</div>
);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add accessibility attributes to message components.

Enhance accessibility by adding appropriate ARIA roles and labels.

 export function UserMessage({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
   return (
-    <div className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
+    <div 
+      role="log"
+      aria-label="User message"
+      className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
       {/* ... */}
     </div>
   );
 }

 export function BotMessage({
   children,
   className,
 }: {
   children: React.ReactNode;
   className?: string;
 }) {
   return (
-    <div className={cn("group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12", className)}>
+    <div
+      role="log"
+      aria-label="Assistant message"
+      className={cn("group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12", className)}>
       {/* ... */}
     </div>
   );
 }

 export function BotCard({
   children,
   showAvatar = true,
 }: {
   children: React.ReactNode;
   showAvatar?: boolean;
 }) {
   return (
-    <div className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
+    <div
+      role="log"
+      aria-label="Assistant card"
+      className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
       {/* ... */}
     </div>
   );
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export function UserMessage({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
return (
<div className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
<div className="flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-background">
<UserIcon />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
}
export function BotMessage({
children,
className,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
className?: string;
}) {
return (
<div className={cn("group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12", className)}>
<div className="flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-primary text-primary-foreground">
<Sparkle />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
}
export function BotCard({
children,
showAvatar = true,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
showAvatar?: boolean;
}) {
return (
<div className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
<div
className={cn(
"flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-primary text-primary-foreground",
!showAvatar && "invisible"
)}
>
<Sparkle />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 px-1">{children}</div>
</div>
);
}
export function UserMessage({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
return (
<div
role="log"
aria-label="User message"
className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
<div className="flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-background">
<UserIcon />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
}
export function BotMessage({
children,
className,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
className?: string;
}) {
return (
<div
role="log"
aria-label="Assistant message"
className={cn("group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12", className)}>
<div className="flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-primary text-primary-foreground">
<Sparkle />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 space-y-2 overflow-hidden px-1">
{children}
</div>
</div>
);
}
export function BotCard({
children,
showAvatar = true,
}: {
children: React.ReactNode;
showAvatar?: boolean;
}) {
return (
<div
role="log"
aria-label="Assistant card"
className="group relative flex items-start md:-ml-12">
<div
className={cn(
"flex h-8 w-8 shrink-0 select-none items-center justify-center rounded-md border shadow-sm bg-primary text-primary-foreground",
!showAvatar && "invisible"
)}
>
<Sparkle />
</div>
<div className="ml-4 flex-1 px-1">{children}</div>
</div>
);
}

Comment on lines +17 to +18
"@ai-sdk/google": "^1.0.4",
"@ai-sdk/togetherai": "^0.0.3",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Add error handling for AI SDK integration

The implementation in action.tsx lacks error handling for the AI SDK operations. While the packages are at stable versions (@ai-sdk/google at 1.0.4) and early but functional version (@ai-sdk/togetherai at 0.0.3), the following issues need attention:

  • No try-catch blocks around the streamUI and togetherai operations
  • Missing error handling for potential API failures or rate limits
  • No fallback mechanism for failed AI responses
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify stability of AI SDK dependencies

The @ai-sdk/togetherai package is at a very early version (0.0.3), which might not be production-ready. Consider the following:

  • Verify the package's stability and production readiness
  • Check for known issues or limitations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest versions and weekly downloads for stability assessment
echo "Checking @ai-sdk/google package:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@ai-sdk/google | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest, .versions[.["dist-tags"].latest].time'

echo -e "\nChecking @ai-sdk/togetherai package:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@ai-sdk/togetherai | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest, .versions[.["dist-tags"].latest].time'

# Check for recent GitHub issues
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "togetherai", name: "sdk") {
    issues(last: 5, states: OPEN) {
      nodes {
        title
        createdAt
        labels(first: 5) {
          nodes {
            name
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 965


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these AI SDK packages are being used in the codebase
# and how they are implemented to assess the risk

# Search for imports/usage of @ai-sdk/togetherai
echo "Usage of @ai-sdk/togetherai:"
rg "@ai-sdk/togetherai" -A 3

# Search for imports/usage of @ai-sdk/google
echo -e "\nUsage of @ai-sdk/google:"
rg "@ai-sdk/google" -A 3

# Check if there are any error handling or try-catch blocks around these SDKs
echo -e "\nError handling around AI SDKs:"
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
  @ai-sdk
  $$$
} catch'

Length of output: 2360


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation in action.tsx to see how these SDKs are used
# and if there's proper error handling

echo "Checking AI SDK implementation in action.tsx:"
cat apps/app/actions/action.tsx

# Let's also check if there are any try-catch blocks in this file
# using a more general pattern
echo -e "\nChecking error handling in action.tsx:"
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
} catch' apps/app/actions/action.tsx

Length of output: 1625

Comment on lines +7 to +8
"start": "next start -p 3001",
"preview": "next build && next start -p 3001",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Documentation update needed for port 3001

The port change to 3001 in the API service requires documentation updates. Our verification found that:

  • No port references exist in any README files
  • No environment templates are present
  • No port configurations in Docker files or config files
  • No explicit port documentation in any of the existing documentation

Please update the following:

  • Add port information to apps/api/README.md
  • Create an .env.example file in the API service directory
  • Update the main README.md with the development ports for all services
  • Document port configurations in Docker setup if containerization is used
🔗 Analysis chain

Documentation update needed for port change.

Since this is a significant infrastructure change that affects local development and deployment, documentation should be updated to reflect the new port.

Please ensure the following are updated:

  • README files
  • Development setup guides
  • Deployment documentation
  • Environment variable templates

Let's check for documentation files that might need updating:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation files
fd -e md -e mdx

# Look for environment templates
fd -g '.env.example' -g '.env.template'

Length of output: 294


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check README files for port mentions
echo "=== Checking main README.md ==="
rg -i "port|3001|3000" README.md || echo "No port mentions found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking API README ==="
rg -i "port|3001|3000" apps/api/README.md || echo "No port mentions found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking other documentation for port references ==="
rg -i "port|3001|3000" CONTRIBUTING.md || echo "No port mentions found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking for environment files ==="
fd ".env" --hidden --no-ignore

Length of output: 7840


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any docker or docker-compose files that might reference the port
echo "=== Checking Docker files for port references ==="
fd -e dockerfile -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg -i "port.*3001|port.*3000" || echo "No port mentions found in Docker files"

# Check for any configuration files that might contain port references
echo -e "\n=== Checking common config files ==="
fd -e json -e js -e ts -g "config*" | xargs rg -i "port.*3001|port.*3000" || echo "No port mentions found in config files"

# Check specifically for Next.js config files
echo -e "\n=== Checking Next.js config files ==="
fd "next.config" | xargs rg -i "port" || echo "No port mentions found in Next.js config"

Length of output: 1115

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ai agent for onboarding process
2 participants