-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add various restricctions to distinct
#378
Comments
distinct
on one attributedistinct
to one attribute
Once you have it, you can make PR from |
distinct
to one attributedistinct
I have investigated this and is very much possible to implement but not with XSD 1.0. We need to switch to XSD 1.1 and make use xsd:assert/ element to achieve all three requirements. Right now it is not clear how we can switch to XSD 1.1. Just mentioning it <schema version="1.1" does not make the difference, we need to change the XSD processor setting to consider XSD version as 1.1. From validate.sh file it is not clear which XSD processor we are using and whether it supports the XSD 1.1. Do you have any information so that I can move ahead? XSD 1.1 is currently supported by Saxon and by Xerces J. |
Happy to change to XSD 1.1 and I believe we just need to change the schema version because I had the impression |
Yes tried it and it is not working with new XSD 1.1 elements.
ERROR:
$
TOKENSCRIPT_SCHEMA=/cygdrive/h/TokenScript/TokenScript/schema/tokenscript.xsd
./validate.sh erc20/AAVE/aDAI.xml
Element '{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}complexType': The content is not
valid. Expected is (annotation?, (simpleContent | complexContent | ((group
| all | choice | sequence)?, ((attribute | attributeGroup)*,
anyAttribute?)))).
WXS schema /cygdrive/h/TokenScript/TokenScript/schema/tokenscript.xsd
failed to compile
make: *** [../../2020-06.mk:35: aDAI.canonicalized.xml] Error 1
…On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 4:43 PM Weiwu Zhang ***@***.***> wrote:
Happy to change to XSD 1.1 and I believe we just need to change the schema
version because I had the impression ./validate.sh (which actually uses a
Makefile) already use an 1.1 procesor. Try it.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#378 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE47O3KNHC3AFRNBCDX5D3TR72AG3ANCNFSM4PXGBQEA>
.
|
After checking more on it found that we have - TokenScript-Examples/examples/2020-06.mk which decides the tool used for validating XML. I have XMLLINT installed which is used for validating and that does not support XSD version 1.1. Other tools here are XMLSECTOOL and XMLSEC, Need to check if those supports XSD 1.1? And if yes need to install on my machine. 2020-06.mk
|
Item three from the list is completed and pushed to branch. This is the change link - c4ca79f Now about action items 1 and 2 I have implemented simple working Java class to validate the XML using XSD 1.1. This Java code is based on xercesImpl.jar, attached with this update named XSDValidator.txt. I have investigated and tried many versions of the XPath using XSD 1.1 but still did not get the perfect solution due to limited features of XSD 1.1. Will give one more try to find out the solution. |
I'll close this issue when the tool mentioned in #395 is made that can do both validation and canonicalisation following the commandline syntax required there, and when you start a new PR which uncommented the two lines of code that uses schema 1.1 |
For a top-level
<token>
element, there can be many<attribute>
. Current schema (in thedistinct
branch) allows any number of elements to have a boolean attributedistinct
which defaults to false,If it is set to true, we say that the attribute is distinct.
That means potentially developers can create a tokenscript file with multiple distinct attributes, which is not supported (at least not in this year)
Can you
restrain it so that for all
<attribute>
under the<token>
only one can have the attributedistinct
with valuetrue
.for a TokenScript that didn't define
<origins>
under<token>
,, require at least one of the<attribute>
has distinct?distinct attribute is not allowed for attributes in
<card>
, only if it is directly in<token>
(the global element<token>
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: