Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(RAPPORT D'ACTIVITE): Faciliter la compréhension de la lecture du rapport d'activité des structures #3359

Open
1 task
Chirazh opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

feat(RAPPORT D'ACTIVITE): Faciliter la compréhension de la lecture du rapport d'activité des structures #3359

Chirazh opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@pYassine
Labels
Stats Statistiques (public, structure, déploiement)

Comments

@Chirazh
Copy link

Chirazh commented Jun 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Situation Actuelle

Description de la situation actuelle

Comportement souhaité

Description du comportement souhaité

Lien vers l'environnement de test

Par défaut : https://domifa-preprod.dev.fabrique.social.gouv.fr/

Recette PO

  • Vérifier l'accès au tuto via le lien public

aide/documentation tickets github: https://github.com/SocialGouv/domifa/tree/master/_docs/github-issues.md
@Chirazh Chirazh added the Stats Statistiques (public, structure, déploiement) label Jun 12, 2024
@Chirazh Chirazh added this to the Sprint 17/06/24 - 01/07/24 milestone Jun 12, 2024
@Chirazh Chirazh changed the title feat(RAPPORT D'ACTIVITE): Ajouter des phrases explicatives sur le rapport d'activité des structures feat(RAPPORT D'ACTIVITE): Faciliter la compréhension de la lecture du rapport d'activité des structures Jun 12, 2024
@Chirazh Chirazh removed this from the Sprint 17/06/24 - 01/07/24 milestone Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pYassine pYassine

Labels
Stats Statistiques (public, structure, déploiement)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pYassine @Chirazh