Sure this "would be nice". Just that there is no test for stellar obscuration, we just plot the stars and then overdraw the Moon. It may be possible to hide planet halos by testing ~200 solar system objects, but please understand that testing every single star against obscuration by the Moon before we plot it is simply (almost certainly -- correct me by sending a PR that proves otherwise!) not advisable in an interactive application.

Ah, it is more complicated and demanding than I tought. Maybe it is possible to circumnavigate that in some way,

Hello @Atque! Thank you for this suggestion.

I tried with a simple test. However, the Moon is rendered as tessellated sphere (i.e. its geometry is like a multi-faceted "disco ball") and therefore can be some arcseconds smaller than it should be. (BTW, this also means occultation times cannot be super-accurate!) In this case stars vanish a few arcseconds besides the Moon. This is also bad, although the first such star I observed turned out to be a close double. Yes, the effect is great! But we need a better test. See #1959.

Thinking about it, an other issue here is that the halo of a star very close to the Moon edge should be seen in front of the Moon I think. See the fake screenshot attached. Is that correct?

@guillaumechereau Yes, technically they should be drawn in front of planets etc (at least until its center is covered). The star texture represents its glare, which is not physical but an optical illusion.

Yes, indeed. This would be even better.