-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 842
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing star at position 7h 37m 35.s773 -14° 25' 8".11 #2998
Comments
Thanks for adding your first issue to Stellarium. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. |
Many stars are missing, sure. Is the star included in the source catalogs documented in the Appendix of the User Guide? You can always cross-check for and find uncataloged (non-plotted) stars using the DSS layer. |
Thanks for your replay and informations.
… Il giorno 6 mar 2023, alle ore 01:57, Georg Zotti ***@***.***> ha scritto:
However, by coordinates I could identify your star in the DSS layer. Yes, it's not in the star catalog. Just to give you an idea about completeness of sky/catalog coverage or where stars brighter than the nominal catalog limit may be missing.
|
Hello @hrnts2000! Please check the fresh version (development snapshot) of Stellarium: |
Hello @hrnts2000! Please check the latest stable version of Stellarium: |
Expected Behaviour: Star visible
A star is lost?
Steps to reproduce
In the region of the open cluster messier 47 (NGC 2422) in the Puppis constellation, at the following location (red box):
RA 7h 37m 35s.773
Dec -14° 25' 8".11
Through consultation of the SIMBAD catalog I noticed the absence of a star.
A SIMBAD query performed using the above coordinates gives the probable position of a star listed as Cl* NGC 2422 PMS 1052 (magnitude in red 12.262). The star was used to calculate the Messier 47 mass function, described in the article "Luminosity and Mass Function of the Galactic open cluster NGC 2422", Astronomy and Astrophysics, volume 404, 927-937 (2003/6-4).
See atach for further information.
System
Best regards.
Renato Polloni
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: