You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
This is more of a question than an issue, but since I cannot find a proper place to post this, so any help would be appreciated:)
In vanila simpleITK, we have control over optimization hyperparameters like learning rate. This can be done with something like
Question: is there a similar way to control learning rate in SimleElastix?
I know that we can control certain optimization parameters by setting the parameter map, something like
Adding some more information: The reason why I would like to have direct control over the learning rate is because the problem I've been working with requires extremely accurate approximation of the transformation parameters.
While the default behavior of the multi-resolution optimizer works okay, it is not to the level of accuracy that I'm hoping for (which is fine, since I understand that the default behavior of the optimizer is designed to work on most image registration applications).
So this question could alternatively be, is there a way to use the previously evaluated parameters as the initial condition, and perform a more accurate estimation of the transformation params (e.g. set learning rate or max step size)?
This is more of a question than an issue, but since I cannot find a proper place to post this, so any help would be appreciated:)
In vanila simpleITK, we have control over optimization hyperparameters like learning rate. This can be done with something like
Question: is there a similar way to control learning rate in SimleElastix?
I know that we can control certain optimization parameters by setting the parameter map, something like
But I was not able to find any information regarding the learning rate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: