We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
At https://github.com/TNO-MPC/protocols.distributed_keygen/blob/main/src/tno/mpc/protocols/distributed_keygen/distributed_keygen.py#L1231, in Class DistributedPaillier class function compute_modulus . Should it be shares.p = Shares.P(p_additive[i], prime_candidate_p[i].get_shares()) instead? To replace prime_candidate_q[i].get_share()
DistributedPaillier
compute_modulus
shares.p = Shares.P(p_additive[i], prime_candidate_p[i].get_shares())
prime_candidate_q[i].get_share()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well spotted, this is indeed a mistake. It's already been resolved in a new version that is currently in the works :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
@Quitlox, you sure about that? https://github.com/TNO-MPC/protocols.distributed_keygen/blob/main/src/tno/mpc/protocols/distributed_keygen/distributed_keygen.py#L1344C1-L1345C84
Still seems broken in latest.
Well spotted, this is indeed a mistake. It's already been resolved in a new version that is currently in the works :) @Quitlox, you sure about that? https://github.com/TNO-MPC/protocols.distributed_keygen/blob/main/src/tno/mpc/protocols/distributed_keygen/distributed_keygen.py#L1344C1-L1345C84 Still seems broken in latest.
Not that version unfortunately, it's still in the works.
No branches or pull requests
At https://github.com/TNO-MPC/protocols.distributed_keygen/blob/main/src/tno/mpc/protocols/distributed_keygen/distributed_keygen.py#L1231, in Class
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/84704071/382734783-c05f038a-b2d5-402e-b7ad-4d0ff0344756.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.agpUNhVyh_uwnBSMD2ivJw7xl0rL1qoqAhQIwvOtAEk)
DistributedPaillier
class functioncompute_modulus
.Should it be
shares.p = Shares.P(p_additive[i], prime_candidate_p[i].get_shares())
instead? To replaceprime_candidate_q[i].get_share()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: