Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (37 loc) · 2.85 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (37 loc) · 2.85 KB
Raw

Task-name

LingOly

Paper

Title: LINGOLY: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource and Extinct Languages

Abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06196

In this paper, we present the LingOly benchmark, a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models. Using challenging Linguistic Olympiad puzzles, we evaluate (i) capabilities for in-context identification and generalisation of linguistic patterns in very low-resource or extinct languages, and (ii) abilities to follow complex task instructions. The LingOly benchmark covers more than 90 mostly low-resource languages, minimising issues of data contamination, and contains 1,133 problems across 6 formats and 5 levels of human difficulty. We assess performance with both direct accuracy and comparison to a no-context baseline to penalise memorisation. Scores from 11 state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate the benchmark to be challenging, and models perform poorly on the higher difficulty problems. On harder problems, even the top model only achieved 38.7% accuracy, 24.7% improvement over the no-context baseline. Large closed models typically outperform open models, and in general, the higher resource the language, the better the scores. These results indicate, in absence of memorisation, true multi-step out-of-domain reasoning remains a challenge for current language models.

Homepage: https://github.com/am-bean/lingOly

Citation

@article{beanLINGOLYBenchmarkOlympiadLevel2024,
  title = {{LINGOLY}: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource and Extinct Languages},
  shorttitle = {{LINGOLY}},
  url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06196},
  author = {Bean, Andrew M. and Hellsten, Simi and Mayne, Harry and Magomere, Jabez and Chi, Ethan A. and Chi, Ryan and Hale, Scott A. and Kirk, Hannah Rose},
  month = jun,
  year = {2024},
  keywords = {Computer Science - Computation and Language}
}

Groups, Tags, and Tasks

Groups

  • group_name: Short description

Tags

  • reasoning: ``
  • linguistics: ``

Tasks

  • exact_match: exact match of generations to reference
  • delta_nc: improvement in score relative to no-context baseline

Checklist

For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:

  • Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
    • Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
    • If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?

If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:

  • Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
  • Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
  • Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?