Diving48 Results are inconsistent with those in the paper

[Z1740220020]

Thank you very much for publicizing your excellent work.I am very interested in your work.
I downloaded your base model for the Diving48 dataset and the result given in your table is 90.8.
However, I tested it on my own machine (data downloaded from the Diving48 official website, and the v2 version of the label) and found the results to be as high as 95.3, and I don't understand why this is.

[Sobeney]

Thank you very much for publicizing your excellent work.I am very interested in your work. I downloaded your base model for the Diving48 dataset and the result given in your table is 90.8. However, I tested it on my own machine (data downloaded from the Diving48 official website, and the v2 version of the label) and found the results to be as high as 95.3, and I don't understand why this is.

Hi, I wonder if you've found a solution to this issue. I've encountered a similar inconsistency problem as well, although it resulted in a drop to 89.1.