You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I have a question about clean-up section.
realSR "adopt bicubic downsampling on the real image in the source domain to remove noise and make the image sharper".
But bicubic downsampling preserve as much information as possible, including noise and content, but rather than "remove noise".
I tested on DIV2K train image 0048.png, which has severe noise. area / bicubic / bilinear downsampled 720*720 images are compared.
bicubic downsampled [bottom left] same visual quaility as HR;
area downsampled [top right] eliminate most background noise;
bilinear downsampled [bottom right] slightly denoise ;
or bicubic downsampling clean-up is just to fit with KernelGAN setting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
problem solved.
opencv bicubic resize function using alpha = -0.75, whick tend to overshot, keep noise pattern from HR;
while imresize bicubic in matlab using alpha = -0.5, generate denoised images as expected.
Hi, I have a question about clean-up section.
realSR "adopt bicubic downsampling on the real image in the source domain to remove noise and make the image sharper".
But bicubic downsampling preserve as much information as possible, including noise and content, but rather than "remove noise".
I tested on DIV2K train image 0048.png, which has severe noise. area / bicubic / bilinear downsampled 720*720 images are compared.
bicubic downsampled [bottom left] same visual quaility as HR;
area downsampled [top right] eliminate most background noise;
bilinear downsampled [bottom right] slightly denoise ;
or bicubic downsampling clean-up is just to fit with KernelGAN setting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: