Support for alternative TLS backends #238
dignifiedquire
started this conversation in
Ideas(新功能的建议和讨论)
Replies: 3 comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
-
Adding support for rustls, would likely make supporting windows #44 easier as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Our current design encapsulates the dependency on the TLS library. We did this on purpose so we can easily switch to or add other TLS libraries later on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am currently looking at alternatives for
quinn
, but due to my current usage, I am relying onrustls
for TLS handling (platform support, and custom certificate verification). So I was wondering if you are open to enabling different TLS backends. Either in a fully generic form, or by feature flagging boringssl & rustls.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions