Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Test::HasVersion for 1.5 #63

Open
schwernbot opened this issue Mar 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Fix Test::HasVersion for 1.5 #63

schwernbot opened this issue Mar 16, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@schwernbot
Copy link

From: @schwern
Date: Thursday Aug 02, 2012 at 04:29 GMT
Orig: Test-More/test-more#328

0.012 is broken with 1.5. Has no serious dependents, very low priority.

Testing Test::HasVersion 0.012, Perl 5.014001, /Users/schwern/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.14.1/bin/perl

t/01_use.t ........... ok
t/02_basic.t ......... ok
t/03_all_pm_files.t .. ok
#   Failed test 'good plan'
#   at t/04_all.ok.t line 19.
#                   'TAP version 13
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:^1\.\.3)'

#   Failed test 'A.pm has version'
#   at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
#                   '1..3
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:^ok \d+ - A.pm)'

#   Failed test 'lib/B.pm has version'
#   at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
#                   'ok 1 - A.pm has version
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:^ok \d+ - lib/B.pm)'

#   Failed test 'lib/B/C.pm has no version'
#   at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
#                   'ok 2 - lib/B.pm has version
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:^not ok \d+ - lib/B/C.pm)'
Use of uninitialized value $ans in regexp compilation at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
Use of uninitialized value $f in regexp compilation at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
Use of uninitialized value $ans in string eq at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
Use of uninitialized value $f in concatenation (.) or string at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.

#   Failed test ' has no version'
#   at t/04_all.ok.t line 25.
#                   'not ok 3 - lib/B/C.pm has version
# '
#     doesn't match '(?^:^ \d+ - )'
#7 tests planned, but 8 ran.
#5 tests of 8 failed.
t/04_all.ok.t ........ 
Dubious, test returned 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500)
Failed 4/7 subtests 
t/09_self_test.t ..... ok
t/97_has_version.t ... ok
t/98_pod-coverage.t .. ok
t/99_pod.t ........... ok

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/04_all.ok.t      (Wstat: 1280 Tests: 8 Failed: 5)
  Failed tests:  4-8
  Non-zero exit status: 5
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 7 tests but ran 8.
Files=8, Tests=28,  2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr  0.02 sys +  1.38 cusr  0.10 csys =  1.56 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/8 test programs. 5/28 subtests failed.
@schwernbot
Copy link
Author

From: @schwern
Date: Friday Aug 03, 2012 at 06:09 GMT
Orig: Test-More/test-more#328 (comment)

Fix sent upstream. Just a test issue. https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=78758

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant