Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clearly marking retracted papers #22

Open
goldturtle opened this issue Jun 18, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Clearly marking retracted papers #22

goldturtle opened this issue Jun 18, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@goldturtle
Copy link
Contributor

@vanaukenk commented on Jul 25, 2016

We should make certain that retracted papers are clearly marked as such in TPC, so curators don't mistakenly try to curate from them.
We do store the paper type 'Retracted publication' in postgres for C. elegans papers, but more generally, this should be available from the PubMed bibliography.
PubMed has also started making these retractions much clearer on their website:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22019085

@goldturtle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vanaukenk commented on Jul 23, 2018

@goldturtle
I think we need to revisit this issue and make it a higher priority. There are papers currently being returned in the TPC searches that are retracted publications, but there's no indication of that in the returned paper display.
PMID:24049119 is an example. We have the information stored in postgres, or it should be readily available from PubMed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant