You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure how widespread this is, but for some PLoS papers I've looked at, the sentences shown in search results is only a subset of the total number of possible matching sentences, or in at least one case, no matching sentences are displayed at all (see search results for 'egl-1' keyword and PMID:30677018).
I don't know if this is because of a formatting issue for gene names in PLoS papers (I seem to recall we have some PDF-to-text conversion issues with PLoS papers for AFP, too).
Thx.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On 4/6/20 2:25 PM, vanaukenk wrote:
I'm not sure how widespread this is, but for some PLoS papers I've
looked at, the sentences shown in search results is only a subset of
the total number of possible matching sentences, or in at least one
case, no matching sentences are displayed at all (see search results
for 'egl-1' keyword and PMID:30677018).
I don't know if this is because of a formatting issue for gene names
in PLoS papers (I seem to recall we have some PDF-to-text conversion
issues with PLoS papers for AFP, too).
Thx.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#32>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACB4CG33H4IJX5R4FQF7XFLRLJCEFANCNFSM4MCTRPCA>.
I'm not sure how widespread this is, but for some PLoS papers I've looked at, the sentences shown in search results is only a subset of the total number of possible matching sentences, or in at least one case, no matching sentences are displayed at all (see search results for 'egl-1' keyword and PMID:30677018).
I don't know if this is because of a formatting issue for gene names in PLoS papers (I seem to recall we have some PDF-to-text conversion issues with PLoS papers for AFP, too).
Thx.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: