[REQUEST] Automatic Handling of Nested track calls

[Connor-Bernard]

Have you checked the issues for a similar suggestions?

• Yes

How would you improve Rich?

I am really enjoying using rich and intend to continue using it whenever I am working with large datasets, but I think it would be extremely helpful to natively support the ability to have nested track statements. For example:

for i in track(range(10)):
    for j in track(range(10)):
        sleep(0.2)

The above example would render a live display with the overall progress like in the gif below but with only two progress bars and the second progress bar would reset to 0 with every iteration of i.

What problem does it solve for you?

I am currently using this to track the training of LLMs which is awesome, but it means processing batches of entire datasets. Processing each batch takes a fair amount of time, so it would be really nice to see how quickly processing is occurring for each batch without having to configure detailed statistics or a more complex configuration with a Live Display.

Related Topics

• Simple nested progress bars #2272

[github-actions]

Thank you for your issue. Give us a little time to review it.

PS. You might want to check the FAQ if you haven't done so already.

This is an automated reply, generated by FAQtory