Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Investigate Only Soft Compat of an Accessories API #2194

Open
bconlon1 opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Feature: Investigate Only Soft Compat of an Accessories API #2194

bconlon1 opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
priority/medium This issue is of medium priority to fix. type/compatibility The issue regards a compatibility or additional feature request relating to another mod. type/enhancement This issue is associated with improvements to an existing feature. type/refactor This issue is associated with the need to refactor and improve code quality.

Comments

@bconlon1
Copy link
Contributor

We'll be using another API for 1.21, but it may be good to futureproof the mod more by figuring out how to make it into a soft compat while having a default embedded accessories system.

@bconlon1 bconlon1 added priority/medium This issue is of medium priority to fix. type/compatibility The issue regards a compatibility or additional feature request relating to another mod. type/enhancement This issue is associated with improvements to an existing feature. type/refactor This issue is associated with the need to refactor and improve code quality. labels Jun 16, 2024
@bconlon1 bconlon1 added this to the Post-Release Features milestone Jun 16, 2024
@bconlon1 bconlon1 self-assigned this Jun 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority/medium This issue is of medium priority to fix. type/compatibility The issue regards a compatibility or additional feature request relating to another mod. type/enhancement This issue is associated with improvements to an existing feature. type/refactor This issue is associated with the need to refactor and improve code quality.
Projects
Status: Back Log
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant