Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JavaScript Course: Expanding Additional Resources in JS Quick Review to Add jQuery Context #29098

Open
3 tasks done
RonnocNiksab opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
3 tasks done

Comments

@RonnocNiksab
Copy link

Checks

Describe your suggestion

The additional resource section calls out the following, "It looks like this lesson doesn’t have any additional resources yet. Help us expand this section by contributing to our curriculum." It also notes, "A quick web-search on the topic will be more useful than any explanations here..."

I'd like to expand this section by adding high quality resources to help students understand the history of jQuery and possibly to get started with jQuery itself. Understanding how things were done (like DOM manipulation) can help one better understand why things are done how they are today.

Path

Node / JS

Lesson Url

https://www.theodinproject.com/lessons/node-path-javascript-a-quick-review

(Optional) Discord Name

No response

(Optional) Additional Comments

This is my first issue ever and I was inspired by The Odin Project to open it. I just wanted to say thanks upfront.

@JoshDevHub
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for making this issue.

Personally I think we want to avoid sending learners on any deep dive into jQuery. In fact, I almost feel like its mention can be removed here as I feel it's become increasingly irrelevant — to the point where bringing it up is just not very useful.

But I'll also solicit some better and more informed opinions on this from the JavaScript team: @TheOdinProject/javascript

@RonnocNiksab
Copy link
Author

Thank you for making this issue.

Personally I think we want to avoid sending learners on any deep dive into jQuery. In fact, I almost feel like its mention can be removed here as I feel it's become increasingly irrelevant — to the point where bringing it up is just not very useful.

But I'll also solicit some better and more informed opinions on this from the JavaScript team: @TheOdinProject/javascript

Thanks for the thoughtful input. I think you make a fair point and I want to avoid sending learners down a deep dive into jQuery, especially if it's an anachronism.

While we wait to hear from the JavaScript team: I’m happy to help with the next steps on this, either if we opt to remove the reference and change the scope of the issue, or opt to add additional resources.

@RonnocNiksab
Copy link
Author

Hi there @JoshDevHub

I had a quick set of questions while we wait to hear back from the JavaScript team.

  1. Do you mind if I open up a tentative PR for the case where we choose to remove the jQuery content?
  2. Are you able to assign me to work on this issue? (JavaScript: clarification for Async. Code recommendation to read article #29124). I feel like I could wrap that one up pretty quickly.

I want to be especially mindful, hence the added questions. 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants