We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Many extensions include discriminators which clearly tag instructions which are included in the extension:
mapping clause encdec = RISCV_FMINM_S(rs2, rs1, rd) if haveZfa()
(Note that issue #4 suggests a more robust tagging method.)
Not all extensions are well-tagged, however, especially if they are ratified and included in the "base ISA":
/* This file specifies the compressed instructions in the 'C' extension. */ [...] mapping clause encdec_compressed = C_LW(ui6 @ ui53 @ ui2, rs1, rd)
It would be useful to include tags for these instructions as well, hopefully in a robust way as suggested in issue #4.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this can be closed since Sanket seems to have implemented this?
Sorry, something went wrong.
I'd like see an audit performed that shows this is reasonably complete and accurate.
Our upstream PR for this work riscv#506 has been merged! 🎉 Thanks for everyone's efforts on this!
Closing this issue...
No branches or pull requests
Many extensions include discriminators which clearly tag instructions which are included in the extension:
(Note that issue #4 suggests a more robust tagging method.)
Not all extensions are well-tagged, however, especially if they are ratified and included in the "base ISA":
It would be useful to include tags for these instructions as well, hopefully in a robust way as suggested in issue #4.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: