You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inside your package add-on ({7c7f6dea-3957-4bb9-9eec-2ef2b9e5bcec}.xpi), image files like "bg.jpg", "2x.png", "38.png", "48.png", "logo.png" etc... are responsible for most of the size of the add-on.
You can dramatically reduce that in the future (it is not a priority now) if you use svg files (instead png etc). This simple detail will make UltimaDark the smaller darkening add-on in the market. IMHO, in underlines, this small size will show more simplicity for UltimaDark, indirectly also implying focus on less and less browser performance impact.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Changing to SVG is definitely doable, it may even be something I could port for you at least partially (I've done some work with SVG)- I think focusing on performance makes sense given UltimaDark is currently a massive performance leader compared to every other extension I have tested.
Inside your package add-on ({7c7f6dea-3957-4bb9-9eec-2ef2b9e5bcec}.xpi), image files like "bg.jpg", "2x.png", "38.png", "48.png", "logo.png" etc... are responsible for most of the size of the add-on.
You can dramatically reduce that in the future (it is not a priority now) if you use svg files (instead png etc). This simple detail will make UltimaDark the smaller darkening add-on in the market. IMHO, in underlines, this small size will show more simplicity for UltimaDark, indirectly also implying focus on less and less browser performance impact.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: