Strange compiler errors mentioning opaque Domain type after Dsl transform

[benhutchison]

Was able to reproduce in a small example, although not very practical:
https://scastie.scala-lang.org/GLQ08KWRSaW2QtlNob8Hxg

type mismatch;
 found   : org.atnos.eff.Eff[R,a3.Foo]
 required: org.atnos.eff.Eff[R,_1.Foo] where val _1: Module.this.Nextie

type mismatch;
 found   : org.atnos.eff.Eff[R,Any]
 required: Domain

[Atry]

I minimized it to https://scastie.scala-lang.org/Atry/65lyloFqTQOZnT9MlyHFEQ/1

import com.thoughtworks.dsl.keywords.Monadic, Monadic.implicitMonadic
import com.thoughtworks.dsl.domains.cats._

import cats.implicits._

import shapeless.tag
import shapeless.tag.@@

import org.atnos.eff._
import org.atnos.eff.all._
import org.atnos.eff.syntax.all._

object Example extends App {



  trait Module {

    abstract class Nextie {
      type Foo 

      def foo[R: _option]: Eff[R, Foo] 
    }

    def foo[R: _option]: Eff[R, Nextie] 

    def tryResolveNext2[R: _option]: Eff[R, Unit] =  {
      val outer = !foo
      
      val f = !outer.foo

      ().pureEff[R]
    }

  } 
}

[Atry]

The cause is scala/bug#8500, resetLocalAttrs does not work with existential types

[Atry]

I don't know if we can workaround it

[Atry]

type mismatch;
 found   : org.atnos.eff.Eff[R,outer.Foo]
 required: org.atnos.eff.Eff[R,outer.Foo]

The error message is horrible, indicating the two outers have different symbols.

[Atry]

An workaround is avoiding the usage of abstract types:

import com.thoughtworks.dsl.keywords.Monadic, Monadic.implicitMonadic
import com.thoughtworks.dsl.domains.cats._

import cats.implicits._

import shapeless.tag
import shapeless.tag.@@

import org.atnos.eff._
import org.atnos.eff.all._
import org.atnos.eff.syntax.all._

object Example extends App {

  trait Module {

    abstract class Nextie {
      type Foo
      
      def foo[R: _option]: Eff[R, Foo] 
    }
    
    object Nextie {
      type Aux[Foo0] = Nextie {
        type Foo = Foo0
      }
    }

    def foo[R: _option, Foo]: Eff[R, Nextie.Aux[Foo]] 

    def tryResolveNext2[R: _option, Foo]: Eff[R, Unit] =  {
      val outer = !foo[R, Foo]
      
      val f = !outer.foo

      ().pureEff[R]
    }

  } 
}

https://scastie.scala-lang.org/Atry/PThXCuU0Qty96YcYL9tVvA

[benhutchison]

Thanks @Atry

…

On Fri, 4 May 2018 at 6:25 pm, 杨博 (Yang Bo) ***@***.***> wrote: An workaround is avoid the usage of existential types: import com.thoughtworks.dsl.keywords.Monadic, Monadic.implicitMonadicimport com.thoughtworks.dsl.domains.cats._ import cats.implicits._ import shapeless.tagimport shapeless.tag.@@ import org.atnos.eff._import org.atnos.eff.all._import org.atnos.eff.syntax.all._ object Example extends App { trait Module { abstract class Nextie { type Foo def foo[R: _option]: Eff[R, Foo ] } object Nextie { type Aux[Foo0] = Nextie { type Foo = Foo0 } } def foo[R: _option, Foo]: Eff[R, Nextie.Aux[Foo]] def tryResolveNext2[R: _option, Foo]: Eff[R, Unit] = { val outer = !foo[R, Foo] val f = !outer.foo ().pureEff[R] } } } https://scastie.scala-lang.org/Atry/PThXCuU0Qty96YcYL9tVvA — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#118 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF05OpXpqgLioKpSVE52vlhnXEFEtpaks5tvBB8gaJpZM4TyQIn> .