Graphs: Minor copy/layout changes

[mariongalley]

• Could we possibly extend the width for the label text as some funders go over 3-4 lines?

• Can we move the 'find funders/Local Authorities' search to the top of the graph rather than the bottom?

• For the "(number of grants)" subtitles, could we put them on the same line and have a dash instead of brackets? i.e. Thing - Number of grants

• The text at the bottom of the charts e.g. "Total Funding organisation type 6" looks messy. Can we:
  • Add a semicolon before all the counts i.e. "Total Funding organisation type: 6"
  • Lowercase words that aren't at the beginning i.e. "Total funding organisation type"
  • Make the "Map" link clearer. I didn't realise this was a clickable link to the map below. Perhaps reword to "View on the map below" or similar?
  • Make them more visually distinct from the graph e.g make them bold or the font size larger?

• On the results page, is it possible to change Organization to Organisation or is that really finnicky because it's in the Standard and Datastore?
  

• Bristol probably shouldn't be 'city of' if Birmingham/Leeds aren't - again, if this is just how the data is then that's fair enough

[michaelwood]

As above checklist:

• Could we possibly extend the width for the label text as some funders go over 3-4 lines?

• Can we move the 'find funders/Local Authorities' search to the top of the graph rather than the bottom?

• For the "(number of grants)" subtitles, could we put them on the same line and have a dash instead of brackets? i.e. Thing - Number of grants

The text at the bottom of the charts e.g. "Total Funding organisation type 6" looks messy. Can we:

• Add a semicolon before all the counts i.e. "Total Funding organisation type: 6"

• Lowercase words that aren't at the beginning i.e. "Total funding organisation type"

• Make the "Map" link clearer. I didn't realise this was a clickable link to the map below. Perhaps reword to "View on the map below" or similar?

• Make them more visually distinct from the graph e.g make them bold or the font size larger?

• On the results page, is it possible to change Organization to Organisation or is that really finnicky because it's in the Standard and Datastore?

• Bristol probably shouldn't be 'city of' if Birmingham/Leeds aren't - again, if this is just how the data is then that's fair enough

[mariongalley]

Adding a couple, not expecting them all to be done before we launch but:

• Can we have commas separating the numbers on the filters themselves e.g.
  
• Can you align the bottom of "(number of grants)" with the graph label as there's a bit of an alignment issue

First of these two is probably most important as it affects readability

[mariongalley]

Comms have mentioned that the map link is really confusing, not sure we'll be able to get to these before launch but if we do, this is also fairly important:

Make the "Map" link clearer. I didn't realise this was a clickable link to the map below. Perhaps reword to "View on the map below" or similar?

[mariongalley]

Adding a couple, not expecting them all to be done before we launch but:

• Can we have commas separating the numbers on the filters themselves e.g.
  
• Can you align the bottom of "(number of grants)" with the graph label as there's a bit of an alignment issue

First of these two is probably most important as it affects readability

This looks resolved in new Insights to me