You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most likely, infer from something opinionated like 'labels', 'masks', etc., in metadata (likely BioImage.channel_names) that something is a labels layer, and instead add as a layer label. Also, add a default opacity (likely 70%, to match napari default) to these added labels.
Consider also that something like a uint image with a max of 1 represents a binary image, and read as a labels. Not sure if a data-approach can be used for others, since both labels and images share the same dtypes frequently -- maybe u/int32/64 are safe?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Most likely, infer from something opinionated like 'labels', 'masks', etc., in metadata (likely BioImage.channel_names) that something is a labels layer, and instead add as a layer label. Also, add a default opacity (likely 70%, to match napari default) to these added labels.
Consider also that something like a uint image with a max of 1 represents a binary image, and read as a labels. Not sure if a data-approach can be used for others, since both labels and images share the same dtypes frequently -- maybe u/int32/64 are safe?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: