In this guide we'll discuss some best practices for how to structure your project. These recommendations align well with Elixir conventions around file and module naming. These conventions allow for a logical coupling of module and file names, and help keep your project organized and easy to navigate.
None of the things we show you here are requirements, only recommendations. Feel free to plot your own course here. Ash avoids any pattern that requires you to name a file or module in a specific way, or put them in a specific place. This ensures that all connections between one module and another module are explicit rather than implicit.
lib/ # top level lib folder for your whole project
├─ my_app/ # your app's main namespace
│ ├─ accounts/ # The Accounts context
│ │ ├─ user/ # resource w/ additional files
│ │ ├─ user.ex # The resource file
│ │ ├─ token.ex # A resource without additional files
│ │ ├─ password_helper.ex # A non-resource file
│ │ ├─ accounts.ex # The Accounts domain module
│ ├─ helpdesk/ # A Helpdesk context
│ │ ├─ notification.ex # A resource without additional files
│ │ ├─ other_file.ex # A non-resource file
│ │ ├─ ticket/ # A resource with additional files
│ │ │ ├─ preparations/ # Components of the resource, grouped by type
│ │ │ ├─ changes/
│ │ │ ├─ checks/
│ │ ├─ ticket.ex # The resource file
Generally speaking, your Ash application lives in the standard place within your elixir application, i.e lib/my_app
. Within that folder, you create one folder for each context that you have. Each context has an Ash.Domain
module within it, and the resources that live within that context. All resource interaction ultimately goes through a domain module.
Alongside the domain module, you have your resources, as well as any other files used in the context. If a resource has any additional files that are used to implement it, they should be placed in a folder with the same name as the resource, in subfolders grouping the files by type. Feel free to choose another logical grouping, but we've found by-type to be effective.
The purpose of Ash is to be both the model of and the interface to your domain logic (A.K.A business logic). Applying this generally looks like building as much of your domain logic "behind" your resources. This does not mean, however, that everything has to go inside of your resources. For example, if you have a Purchase
resource, and you want to be able to display a list of purchases that were taxable, and also calculate the percentage of the purchase that was taxable. You might have an action called :taxable
and a calculation called :percentage_tax
.
actions do
...
read :taxable do
filter expr(taxable == true)
end
end
calculations do
calculate :percentage_tax, :decimal, expr(
sum(line_items, field: :amount, query: [filter: tax == true]) /
sum(line_items, field: :amount)
)
end
In practice, you may not need the taxable
action, i.e perhaps you simply want a "taxable" checkbox on a list view in your application, in which case you may use the primary read, or some other read like :transaction_report
. You would then, on the consumer, provide the filter for taxable == true
, and load the :percentage_tax
calculation.
Lets say you want the user to fill in a github issue id, and you will fetch information from that github issue to use as part of creating a "ticket" in your system.. You might be tempted to do something like this in a LiveView:
def handle_event("link_ticket", %{"issue_id" => issue_id}, socket) do
issue_info = GithubApi.get_issue(issue_id)
MyApp.Support.update_ticket(socket.assigns.ticket_id, %{issue_info: %{
title: issue_info.title,
body: issue_info.body
}})
end
But this is putting business logic inside of your UI/representation layer. Instead, you should write an action and put this logic inside of it.
defmodule MyApp.Ticket.FetchIssueInfo do
use Ash.Resource.Change
def change(changeset, _, _) do
Ash.Changeset.before_transaction(changeset, fn changeset ->
issue_info = GithubApi.get_issue(changeset.arguments.issue_id)
Ash.Changeset.force_change_attributes(changeset, %{
issue_info: %{
title: issue_info.title,
body: issue_info.body
}
})
end)
end
end
Then you'd have an action like this:
update :link_ticket do
argument :issue_id, :string, allow_nil?: false
change MyApp.Ticket.FetchIssueInfo
end
This cleanly encapsulates the operation behind the resource, even while the code for fetching the github issue still lives in a GitHubApi
module.