You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running both with and without TVM_LDE_TRACE="no_cache", I've seen some quite troubling performance numbers for proving when the padded height is $2^{23}$. We should get performance numbers and RAM consumption for these three padded heights and investigate: $2^{21}$ (for reference), $2^{22}$, and $2^{23}$.
Specifically, a user with 2TB RAM and 256 cores reports that proving for a padded height of $2^{23}$ takes two hours where it, by my calculations, should take less than 600 seconds. And I ran out of RAM when attempting to create these proofs, even with TVM_LDE_TRACE="no_cache" and having 768GB RAM, which should be plenty for this configuration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The behavior was observed when running a SingleProof program with many inputs, which translates to the verification of many correct executions of RemovalRecordIntegrity.
Edit: The above-marked function call in the test crashes on our hardware, though: Even with 768GB RAM and TVM_LDE_TRACE="no_cache". A way forward would be to run it with live time reporting activated to see where the problems occur.
Running both with and without$2^{23}$ . We should get performance numbers and RAM consumption for these three padded heights and investigate: $2^{21}$ (for reference), $2^{22}$ , and $2^{23}$ .
TVM_LDE_TRACE="no_cache"
, I've seen some quite troubling performance numbers for proving when the padded height isSpecifically, a user with 2TB RAM and 256 cores reports that proving for a padded height of$2^{23}$ takes two hours where it, by my calculations, should take less than 600 seconds. And I ran out of RAM when attempting to create these proofs, even with
TVM_LDE_TRACE="no_cache"
and having 768GB RAM, which should be plenty for this configuration.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: