You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
DensityModel isn't that useful now that we have LogDensityProblems.jl propagated through the ecosystem.
So should we just remove it?
The only downside I see here is that technically LogDensityProblems.jl requires implementing dimension, but this would mean that we can support models with varying dimensionality.
However, as long as the underlying sampler doesn't explicitly call dimension, we could just ignore this tbh 🤷
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
DensityModel
isn't that useful now that we have LogDensityProblems.jl propagated through the ecosystem.So should we just remove it?
The only downside I see here is that technically LogDensityProblems.jl requires implementing
dimension
, but this would mean that we can support models with varying dimensionality.However, as long as the underlying sampler doesn't explicitly call
dimension
, we could just ignore this tbh 🤷The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: